| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nawee
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Posts: 400
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:04 pm Post subject: far more superior |
|
|
Hello,
Is it "far superior" or "far more superior"?
They have far more superior weapons.
"Far more superior" sounds correct to me, but I can't explain why we need "more" if the word "superior" already implies the idea of being "better"?
Thank you,
Nawee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yinglish

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a matter of an increasing degree of emphasis. Like this:
David Beckham is better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is more better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is far more better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yinglish,
Superb!
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Superior" means "better" or "higher," depending on the context. You can say "far superior" just as you can say "far better," but you cannot say "more superior" or "more better."
I can't agree with Yinglish's view. What you can say properly is:
David Beckham is better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is more good-looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is far better looking than Rowan Atkinson.
David Beckham is much better looking than Rowan Atkinson. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nawee
Joined: 29 Apr 2006 Posts: 400
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand your examples with "better looking" and "far better looking", CP. But why is it that we can say both "far superior" and "far more superior"? Do they mean the same thing or is there a difference in the degree of superiority?
Thank you,
Nawee |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Nawee,
Review these sites on degrees of adjectives and the definition of "superior" and you will see that "far more superior" is a very acceptable (also very common) phrase.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/adjectives.htm#premodifiers
http://www.wordsmyth.net/live/home.php?script=search&matchid=41381&returnFields
You'll notice "superior" can be comparative (better) or superlative (best).
Although very few dictionaries will list superior as a superlative, in common speech and everyday usage, this connotation is quite prevalent.
Report card grade: good, very good, excellent (best)
Report card grade: needs improvement, satisfactory, superior (best)
This dog is of a superior breed.
connotation: This dog is of the best breed.
Name of a company: Superior Kitchenware
connotation: Better kitchenware? No, best kitchenware.
This is superior.
This is best.
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nawee wrote: |
I understand your examples with "better looking" and "far better looking", CP. But why is it that we can say both "far superior" and "far more superior"? Do they mean the same thing or is there a difference in the degree of superiority?
Thank you,
Nawee |
You cannot correctly say "far more superior." You can say "far superior" just as you can say "far better." It is a matter of how much better -- a little better or much better. A little higher or much higher. Yinglish's second and third examples were not correct. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sometimes English can be subjective.
Dialogue you might hear:
Hey Dave, did you see that Benz? It looks really cool.
Well, I don't know John, I think the new BMW looks better.
Come on Dave. You must be blind. The interior of the Benz is far more superior than the interior of the BMW.
To what degree the English in the dialogue might be incorrect is questionable. But the dialogue itself is pretty common.
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to play the "Google" game, googling "far superior" gives 1,220,000 hits, and googling "far more superior" gives 92,600 hits. I prefer "far superior" myself.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would expect that result. The second phrase has a higher degree of modification. Hence, it is used less often.
great grandfather - 1,300,000
great great grandfather - 892,000
I'm sure it's been discussed at length. IMHO, Google is a great tool to explore and get initial indications. But, I would never interpret its results as anything close to being definitive. Just too many variables.
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CP
Joined: 12 Jun 2006 Posts: 2875 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Google, Schmoogle. It is still not correct to say "far more superior" or even "more superior."
Shall we start saying "ain't got no" is good English because of Google?
Google results:
"ain't got no" 1,250,000 hits.
"have no" 225,000,000 hits.
Oh, and "ain't got no" has the higher degree of modification. _________________ You live a new life for every new language you speak. -Czech proverb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As I said... too many variables.
Let's start from the beginning.
The BMW looks good.
The Benz looked better.
But, the Jaguar looked even more better.
We finally decided that the Bentley looked the best.
According to a fairly reliable source, there's nothing wrong with these statements.
Both adverbs and adjectives in their comparative and superlative forms can be accompanied by premodifiers, single words and phrases, that intensify the degree.
* We were a lot more careful this time.
* He works a lot less carefully than the other jeweler in town.
* We like his work so much better.
* You'll get your watch back all the faster.
And sometimes a set phrase, usually an informal noun phrase, is used for this purpose:
* He arrived a whole lot sooner than we expected.
* That's a heck of a lot better
Now, I submit that the two phrases below are approximately the same; the difference only in the degree of "better":
even more better
far more better
Now, replace better with "superior."
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lorikeet

Joined: 08 Oct 2005 Posts: 1877 Location: San Francisco
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually Lotus, I can accept all of your examples except "even more better" and "far more better". I really can't use "more" with "better." I'm not saying someone somewhere doesn't use it, but it isn't something I would feel comfortable teaching students.
And I know what Google can and can't do. I was just indicating the obvious preference in my post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lotus

Joined: 25 Jan 2004 Posts: 862
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
What we do here is discuss English in its many forms. There is prescriptive and descriptive, connotative and denotative, structural and conversational.
much better
more better
a lot better
far better
These are all very common phrases. It's true that much more better or far more better are not as common as the list above. But, they are not incorrect as the quoted source indicates. Perhaps these phrases are more in line with the descriptive, connotative and conversational part of English.
This is in answer to Nawee's original question:
Is it "far superior" or "far more superior"
They have far more superior weapons.
"Far more superior" sounds correct to me, but I can't explain why we need "more" if the word "superior" already implies the idea of being "better"?
The use of "more" is to enhance or intensify the degree of the adjective "superior."
Suggested alternative sentences:
They have better weapons.
Their weapons are better.
Their weapons are far more better than ours.
Their weapons are far better than what we have.
Their weapons are superior.
Their weapons are far more superior than ours.
Why did we win the war? It was because our weapons were far more superior than theirs. (snobbishly)
My apologies Lorikeet. My terse statement was only meant to express my personal reservations on the usefulness of Google's numerical search results.
It's a shame that the tone of this thread had gotten away from the very funny initial response from Yinglish! In my opinion, there was nothing wrong with his response. I might have used better-looking in the second and third sentences. But, his use of degree of emphasis progression, along with the pictures, was effective and funny!
--lotus _________________ War does not make one great --Yoda
Last edited by lotus on Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:10 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yinglish

Joined: 30 Jan 2007 Posts: 99
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|