Site Search:
 
Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

the position of "raw"

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ShoHiro



Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 10:51 am    Post subject: the position of "raw" Reply with quote

Dear teachers,

Which is better, (a) or (b)?

(a) John put the meat raw on top of the melon.

(b) John put the meat on top of the melon raw.

In (b), raw refers to not the melon but the meat.

Sincerely,
ShoHiro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pugachevV



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 2295

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

b. is better I think.
Usually,I would say "John put the raw meat on top of the melon."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pugachevV wrote:
b. is better I think.
Usually,I would say "John put the raw meat on top of the melon."


I agree. There seems to be no reason to try it another way. This way is very clear.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShoHiro



Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear pugachevV,

Thank you very much.

I understand your point. But my interest is how to use "secondary predicates".

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Lorikeet,

Thank you very much.

Do you judge (b) to be more acceptable?


ShoHiro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of the two choices, I prefer b, but I would never say it and doubt I would hear it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ShoHiro



Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear Lorikeet,

Thank you very much. I see.

How about the following sentence, though they are similar questions?

(1) a. John ate the salad dry.
b. John ate the toast dry.
c. John ordered his salad dry.

Are they acceptable?

ShoHiro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShoHiro



Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:01 am    Post subject: a related question Reply with quote

Would you please ask a related question?

Can the sentence (1) be paraphrazed as (2)?

(1) Bill ate a fish whole.

(2) When Bill ate a fish, it was whole.

ShoHiro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ShoHiro



Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:42 am    Post subject: further question Reply with quote

I would like to know about another case.

You can correctly say (1),

(1) Bill bought these stocks over-the-counter.

(Suppose that the sentence (1) is the answer to the question How did Bill buy those stocks?)

How about (2)?

(2) Bill gave Mary these stocks over-the-counter.


ShoHiro
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ShoHiro wrote:
Dear Lorikeet,

Thank you very much. I see.

How about the following sentence, though they are similar questions?

(1) a. John ate the salad dry.
b. John ate the toast dry.
c. John ordered his salad dry.

Are they acceptable?

ShoHiro


Hmm. I think I might say, "John ate the salad plain." That would mean he didn't put any dressing on it. I don't think I'd use "dry" as an adjective for that. "John ordered his salad plain." would be okay too.

"John ate the toast dry." sounds okay, but as I've said before (I know you are practicing this construction) John ate some dry toast would be okay too. He also ordered a plain salad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:04 am    Post subject: Re: a related question Reply with quote

ShoHiro wrote:
Would you please ask a related question?

Can the sentence (1) be paraphrazed as (2)?

(1) Bill ate a fish whole.

(2) When Bill ate a fish, it was whole.

ShoHiro


"Bill ate a fish whole." sounds okay, but it seems like it would be for a sardine. He just popped the whole fish in his mouth--head, tail, fins, whatever, and ate the fish whole.

Oddly enough, that seems to be to would be different from "Bill ate the whole fish." which means he didn't share it with anyone (but maybe it was a big fish and he was very hungry.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lorikeet



Joined: 08 Oct 2005
Posts: 1877
Location: San Francisco

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:08 am    Post subject: Re: further question Reply with quote

ShoHiro wrote:
I would like to know about another case.

You can correctly say (1),

(1) Bill bought these stocks over-the-counter.

(Suppose that the sentence (1) is the answer to the question How did Bill buy those stocks?)

How about (2)?

(2) Bill gave Mary these stocks over-the-counter.


ShoHiro


I had to check what "over-the-counter" meant in talking about stocks. I don't know if sentence 1 is okay, or if you would have to say, "Bill bought these stocks in over-the-counter trading." "Bill bought these over-the-counter stocks." might be okay too.

I don't see how (2) would work. "Bill gave Mary these over-the-counter stocks" might be okay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dave's ESL Cafe's Student Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Help Center All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Dave's ESL Cafe is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Banner Advertising | Bookstore / Alta Books | FAQs | Articles | Interview with Dave
Copyright © 2018 Dave's ESL Cafe | All Rights Reserved | Contact Dave's ESL Cafe | Site Map

Teachers College, Columbia University: Train to Teach English Here or Abroad
SIT
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group