frequently used

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
joon
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:27 am
Location: Daejun, South Korea

frequently used

Post by joon » Fri May 09, 2003 9:49 am

(1) The fish which I caught yesterday is still alive.

(2) The fish that I caught yesterday is still alive.


I think both are grammatically correct.
However, I like to know which is more frequently used between (1) and (2) among native speakers ?

Roger
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:58 am

Post by Roger » Sat May 10, 2003 4:38 am

"The fish I caught is still alive"
would be more ocommonly used than any of the other two variants! The relative pronoun "which" or "that" is formal but optional.

joon
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:27 am
Location: Daejun, South Korea

Post by joon » Sun May 11, 2003 1:31 am

I met next question some days ago.

(Q1) Which is correct? (3)

(1) I have a house (which) window is pretty good.

(2) I met a woman (whom) could speak six languages.

(3) The fish which I caught yesterday is still alive.


I was thinking of next question when I met the question

(Q2) which is the most acceptable? (3)

(1) The fish which I caught yesterday is still alive.

(2) The fish that I caught yesterday is still alive.

(3) The fish I caught yesterday is still alive.


I think (Q2) is more educational than (Q1).

Because (Q1) shows two ungrammatical sentences, and one awkard sentence.

That leads students to be familiar with ungrammatical and awkard.

What do you think of my point?


I have another question here.

(1) I have a house whose window is pretty good.
(2) I have a house its window is pretty good.

Which is acceptable between (1) and (2) ?

Roger
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:58 am

Post by Roger » Sun May 11, 2003 1:36 am

A house WHOSE window.... (not 'which' nor 'its window'...)

I met a woman WHO could speak six languages
(not 'WHOM' as "who' is subject and 'whom' would be object).

joon
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2003 10:27 am
Location: Daejun, South Korea

Post by joon » Sun May 11, 2003 9:14 am

Thank you very much, Roger.


What about "of which"?

(example) I have a house of which window is pretty good.

Is this acceptable English?

Roger
Posts: 274
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 1:58 am

Post by Roger » Mon May 12, 2003 2:02 am

No. It's difficult to make head or tail out of this sentence!
'of which' is what I might call a 'partitive', it implies being a part of house. BUt 'window' needs a quantifier such as "one" or 'several" or a plural marker -s:
"a house of which a window is..."
'a house of which several windows..."

But in your previous sentence, you used 'whose', relative pronoun. It means that the window(s) of THIS PARTICULAR house.

Post Reply