Why is "get a job WITH the company" correct??

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
citruscinders
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2005 2:57 am

Why is "get a job WITH the company" correct??

Post by citruscinders » Tue May 31, 2005 10:26 pm

A student is arguing that the phrase should be "He sent in his resume and hopes to get a job 'at' the company." It should be 'with' but, I can not find facts to prove my point. I would appreciate any ideas.

Thanks in advance!

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Tue May 31, 2005 10:33 pm

"At" and "with" are both ok, I'd say.

The use of prepositions is always a little arbitrary.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Wed Jun 01, 2005 7:42 am

"At" and "with" are both ok, I'd say.
Or in. It sounds like your student wants there to be one (and only one) correct way of saying something, but language (any language, as far as I know) simply doesn't work like that.

This reminds me of a student who asked me whether it was correct to say in the station or at the station. When I told her both were fine, she got very frustrated and asked "But which is better?". Basically she wanted me to give her one correct way she could say all the time. The better question would have been "Why are they both correct?"; the reason being that you can think of a station as a building which encloses you, so you can be in it, or a point on a map, so you can be at it. I leave it to you to think about why you can work at, with or in a company.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:19 am

By the way, citrus, if the text you are quoting from is authentic, then there is the evidence that proves your point. Just because it's not what your student wants to see doesn't make it wrong. The problem is that your student can't accept that language isn't black and white.

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:42 pm

'for' is also correct.

woodcutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
Location: London

Post by woodcutter » Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:17 am

Is you sure?

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:20 am

Yea, I wasn't paying attention to the exact phrase:
He's hoping to work for/at IBM
He's hoping to get a job at/with IBM

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Thu Jun 02, 2005 9:38 am

If the person in question were touting for business for his company and trying to win a contract, I suppose one could say He's hoping to get a job for the company. It wouldn't mean the same thing as the others though.

Post Reply