Generic "will".
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
Generic "will".
"1. I am a carnivore and a predator though sometimes I will scavenge. I live in the Arctic where I stay by myself most of my life. I am well camouflaged in the snow, though my skin is actually black to absorb the heat of the sun. I will kill and eat seals and walruses, but I will also eat carrion, such as a dead whale. I love water and am such a strong swimmer that I can swim miles at a time. Who am I?"
http://www.rogerwilliamsparkzoo.org/education/hunt.cfm
How would the removal of "will" affect the meaning of the above passage? Would the writer's intended effect still be fully appreciated?
http://www.rogerwilliamsparkzoo.org/education/hunt.cfm
How would the removal of "will" affect the meaning of the above passage? Would the writer's intended effect still be fully appreciated?
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
- Location: Brazil
It wouldn't affect so much, would it?
Sometimes it is just a matter of style, for what I see in the passage, what the author considers undeniable facts, they use the present simple (I am...I live) and what is still factual (the animal's eating habit) but let's say it is something we (from our point of view) can't predict or measure, then they prefer to turn those sentences into non-factual (using that modal that one famous one will paraphrase 'given my perception of the immediate situation, it is inevitably true that..' ), but again, if they used the present simple it wouldn't make much (if any) different to the regular reader.
Guess I could blow mine and my students' heads with this (mainly for the ones that will is the 'future simple'.)
José
Sometimes it is just a matter of style, for what I see in the passage, what the author considers undeniable facts, they use the present simple (I am...I live) and what is still factual (the animal's eating habit) but let's say it is something we (from our point of view) can't predict or measure, then they prefer to turn those sentences into non-factual (using that modal that one famous one will paraphrase 'given my perception of the immediate situation, it is inevitably true that..' ), but again, if they used the present simple it wouldn't make much (if any) different to the regular reader.
Guess I could blow mine and my students' heads with this (mainly for the ones that will is the 'future simple'.)
José
Metamorfose wrote:It wouldn't affect so much, would it?
Sometimes it is just a matter of style, for what I see in the passage, what the author considers undeniable facts, they use the present simple (I am...I live) and what is still factual (the animal's eating habit) but let's say it is something we (from our point of view) can't predict or measure, then they prefer to turn those sentences into non-factual (using that modal that one famous one will paraphrase 'given my perception of the immediate situation, it is inevitably true that..' ), but again, if they used the present simple it wouldn't make much (if any) different to the regular reader.
Guess I could blow mine and my students' heads with this (mainly for the ones that will is the 'future simple'.)
José
I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.
Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!
They reject such wonderful British English items as:
If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.
(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)
When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.
(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)
And other such delights as:
I don't know what other delights you had in mind, but the first one sounds very strange to my ears, and the second one sounds normal. So I scored 50%metal56 wrote:
I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.
Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!
They reject such wonderful British English items as:
If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.
(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)
When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.
(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)
And other such delights as:

--Lorikeet
Lorikeet wrote:I don't know what other delights you had in mind, but the first one sounds very strange to my ears, and the second one sounds normal. So I scored 50%metal56 wrote:
I asked this because I've been a bit stunned these past few days by how many Americans do not know, or cannot see the need for, "will" for persistence, habit and generic qualities.
Those AE speakers keep saying that "will" is future and that's all. Scaryyy!!
They reject such wonderful British English items as:
If you will keep smoking, it's no wonder you feel so bad.
(Persistence/habit. General Time reference and emphatic)
When food is scarce, the biggest chick will kill and eat the smaller ones.
(Generic quality. General Time reference and emphatic)
And other such delights as:
--Lorikeet
What's your variant of English?
I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."
So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
Those who look toward Merriam-Webster, learn.lolwhites wrote:I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."
So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
1 -- used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent, or in negative constructions refusal <no one would take the job> <if we will all do our best> <will you please stop that racket>
2 -- used to express frequent, customary, or habitual action or natural tendency or disposition <will get angry over nothing> <will work one day and loaf the next>
3 -- used to express futurity <tomorrow morning I will wake up in this first-class hotel suite -- Tennessee Williams>
4 -- used to express capability or sufficiency <the back seat will hold three passengers>
5 -- used to express probability and often equivalent to the simple verb <that will be the milkman>
6 a -- used to express determination, insistence, persistence, or willfulness <I have made up my mind to go and go I will> b -- used to express inevitability <accidents will happen>
7 -- used to express a command, exhortation, or injunction <you will do as I say, at once>
intransitive senses : to have a wish or desire <whether we will or no>
-
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
- Location: London
Suddenly? I've always done so.woodcutter wrote:Not a very good start to this thread, since the passage quoted has no need at all for "will", it is only a stylistic matter.
Are you suddenly in favour of Stephen Jonesian (orthodox!) multiple meanings, Metal, quoting the dictionary like that?
What is the stylistic reason (if that is the reason) for using "will" there?
-
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
- Location: London
The "will" in the first passage sounds to me like the present tense version of "would" used for nostalgia "I would play in the woods in those days".
Since it is tagged on to sentences already describing habit, it is not necessary for that, the function of the word is to provide a kind of present tense imaginative whimsy. I cannot think of a use for this outside of tedious British parlour games.
Since it is tagged on to sentences already describing habit, it is not necessary for that, the function of the word is to provide a kind of present tense imaginative whimsy. I cannot think of a use for this outside of tedious British parlour games.
-
- Posts: 1195
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 6:33 pm
- Location: Aguanga, California (near San Diego)
W
I personally would eschew the M-W catalog of uses, at least in the classroom. It tends to leave students (adult students, at least) with the notion that every word in English has a long list of "particular uses" which must be memorized. It reinforces their conviction that English is a very hard (almost impossible to master) language.metal56 wrote:Those who look toward Merriam-Webster, learn.lolwhites wrote:I was once disussing the use if will for present speculation (e.g. "Where's John?" "He'll be in the pub as usual.") with a Canadian colleague, whose response was "In canada we don't say that."
So, I suspect use of will varies across dialects. Those who look for one unifying meaning to cover all uses of modals should take note.
1 -- used to express desire, choice, willingness, consent, or in negative constructions refusal <no one would take the job> <if we will all do our best> <will you please stop that racket>
2 -- used to express frequent, customary, or habitual action or natural tendency or disposition <will get angry over nothing> <will work one day and loaf the next>
3 -- used to express futurity <tomorrow morning I will wake up in this first-class hotel suite -- Tennessee Williams>
4 -- used to express capability or sufficiency <the back seat will hold three passengers>
5 -- used to express probability and often equivalent to the simple verb <that will be the milkman>
6 a -- used to express determination, insistence, persistence, or willfulness <I have made up my mind to go and go I will> b -- used to express inevitability <accidents will happen>
7 -- used to express a command, exhortation, or injunction <you will do as I say, at once>
intransitive senses : to have a wish or desire <whether we will or no>
Instead, I prefer to suggest that will has a single function which never varies, though understanding it and applying it requires rather flexible interpretations in particular uses. It always means that the user is speculating, but there may be different reasons for his speculation.
In the case of the passage in M56's original post above, we are reminded that the passage was written by a human being. That human necessarily is speculating about the activities of a polar bear. Had it been written by the bear herself, I imagine the will would be absent, and the effect would be to simply make true statements with no need for speculation.
Larry Latham
-
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 6:14 am
- Location: London