impacting??

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
Metamorfose
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 2:21 pm
Location: Brazil

impacting??

Post by Metamorfose » Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:21 pm

(1) Her book is shot through with impacting but subtle violence.

I concoted this sentence as an example for 'be shot through with' but the point is whether this impacting is proper English, is it ok?

José

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:00 am

You will find hundreds of irate letters to the editor, blog entries, web pages and corrections to other's writings insisting that 'impact' as a verb is a monstrosity that heralds the end of civilized discourse.

Which, as usual, indicates that the form is both common and correct :)

thethinker
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:49 pm

Post by thethinker » Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:12 pm

It's great to read about the kind of language features people complained about a few hundred years ago, because most of the time they are now considered perfectly acceptable. A nice one is mentioned in David Crystal's book "The Stories of English". The word "balcony" was originally stressed on the second syllable (as it is in many other languages), and there were furious complaints about the "modern fashion" of stressing the first syllable as we do now. There would be similar complaints now if for some reason it started to change back.

People who try to fight against language change and involved in a painful and losing battle.

dullard
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:33 pm

Post by dullard » Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:13 pm

thethinker wrote:People who try to fight against language change and involved in a painful and losing battle.
<soapbox>
You're right of course. However, in an era where English is poised to become the de facto universal second language, I feel the need to make some attempt to control the changes and to try to define what is correct. I would use an analogy of a heavy truck at the summit of a hill. Do we wan't to go downhill with our foot on the accelerator or the brake?
</soapbox>

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Tue Sep 27, 2005 8:52 pm

Do we wan't to go downhill with our foot on the accelerator or the brake?
As neither or them are wired up, it won't make an iota of difference.

Andrew Patterson
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Patterson » Wed Sep 28, 2005 6:10 am

Official reports of aeronautical disasters never talk about an aeroplane crashing, they always state that it "impacted with the ground".

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Thu Sep 29, 2005 8:24 am

thethinker wrote:The word "balcony" was originally stressed on the second syllable (as it is in many other languages), and there were furious complaints about the "modern fashion" of stressing the first syllable as we do now.
Did the stress move to the first syllable to help avoid potential confusion with 'baloney'? :P

Post Reply