Thank you to Fluffy Hamster and Lorri Keet for your previous responses on my grammar stumper.
Okay who dares to take this one on?
Topic: Using Infinitives
Grammatically correct sentence:
My mission IS TO HELP John.
(you need the "to" between "is" and "help" right?)Okay , what about:
What I HAVE TO DO IS HELP John.
(why does the "to" disappear here between "is" and "help", I know the Brits put the "to" but North Americans do not)
Any ideas?
Who Dares Take On This Mother of All Grammar Questions?
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
-
- Posts: 3031
- Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
- Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
Well, if the 'to' can optionally be omitted or included (I myself will certainly accept either version*), then it won't have truly totally disappeared, will it! In which case, where's the "problem" (for syntax)? This would just seem to be a case of possible ellipsis. Find us a puzzle where there is a definite difference (in all varieties of English)!
BTW: My mission is...'Help John' (the ... signify a pause in which a speaker is opening a secret message. In writing, a comma could occur)).
Also: ?My mission is helping John; ??What I have to do is helping John. (?=Ambiguity in meaning).
*As a Brit I'd put a 'can' between 'Brits' and 'put' in your 'I know the Brits put the "to" '.
BTW: My mission is...'Help John' (the ... signify a pause in which a speaker is opening a secret message. In writing, a comma could occur)).
Also: ?My mission is helping John; ??What I have to do is helping John. (?=Ambiguity in meaning).

*As a Brit I'd put a 'can' between 'Brits' and 'put' in your 'I know the Brits put the "to" '.