With all due respect, it sounds like you're still making it up as you go along, even after what, 2+ decades of teaching at that super high performance tempo of yours. I was imagining you'd have things a bit more sussed by now is all...and if the only context you can "think" of is 'I'm bored of Fluff's nonsense'*, well...metal56 wrote:Anyway, away from manipulation, I would review each situation as it comes up. If I felt there was a need to teach that meaning as part of "be gong to", I would do so.
And as long as I see a use for such statements as, "I've had enough of Fluff's nonsense, I'm off to/going to sleep", I will maybe teach it.
But you just keep on responding, don't you! Can't be such a total drag for you then, can it.As for "windbag"
Quick definitions (windbag)
noun: a boring person who talks a great deal about uninteresting topics
Remember that you are the one who posted a such a trifling issue. You are the one who writes enormous posts about almost nothing.

*I note that you've felt the need to add 'off to' as an alternative, and use 'sleep' rather than 'bed', all versus 'I'm going to sleep/falling asleep here' (rather than ' "now" ') - Oh no! Is 'here' an "intention regarding sleeping place", meant to convey 'HERE as opposed to the bed that I usually sleep in'?! Here's to hoping that some insane teacher doesn't start teaching that, eh: 'I'm going to sleep HERE', with no mention of 'I'm going to/falling asleep here...' as surely being the more usual phrasing/intended meaning/interpretation here (="here", around and about, in the world at large, throughout the entire non-Klingon-speaking universe etc). That's not to say that one couldn't ever actually utter, should one feel the need, 'I'm going to sleep HERE (and not in my bed, tonight)', but this should not be presented as the norm, should it. Knock off that 'here' there (LOL), and consider changing 'going to' to 'falling a-/nodding off etc', and you have what I consider(ed) the crux of the thread (that is, if you want to convey much if any prediction let alone intention you're going to need to add e.g. adjuncts of place or duration to the original sentence. A simple point, to be sure, but I'm not sure that metal ever acknowledged the oddity of that original, decontextualized sentence, nor the likelihood of there being differing phrasingS instead of or beyond "it" (for the very functional reason of avoiding ambiguity, even subconsciously)).