<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
-
metal56
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am
Post
by metal56 » Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:41 am
"The OED faces an increasingly uphill struggle in its attempts to capture World English; almost every Anglophone country has now developed a set of distinctive uses, some more divergent than others."
Roger Blench
Cambridge
Considering that, which of the main dictionary publications can truly be called "a dictionary of English"? And are there distinctions made between the terms "a dictionary of English" and "an English dictionary"?
-
Stephen Jones
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
Post
by Stephen Jones » Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:19 pm
I've just checked through the SOED for contemporary Indian uses, and it is patchy. It will give words like 'lakh' and 'crore', but is patchy on common uses of other English words such as 'bugger' or 'hotel' or 'denting'.
-
metal56
- Posts: 3032
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am
Post
by metal56 » Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:28 am
Stephen Jones wrote:I've just checked through the SOED for contemporary Indian uses, and it is patchy. It will give words like 'lakh' and 'crore', but is patchy on common uses of other English words such as 'bugger' or 'hotel' or 'denting'.
Hence the modifier "shorter".