Little Need to Worry?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Little Need to Worry?

Post by metal56 » Wed Jan 10, 2007 4:36 pm

David Crystal, in an article called Little Need to Worry, said "I've never counted just how many non-standard constructions of the type "we was" and "ain't" there are, but I would be surprised if the figure were more than 100".

How many do you think there are? Is there a really major difference between so called Standard English and so called Non-Standard English?

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:35 am

Could we have a link to the article.

Considering Crystal's ravings about the number of English speakers in India, I suspect Mathematics is not his strongpoint.

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:26 am

Here's the link: http://www.crystalreference.com/DC_arti ... lish63.pdf

The problem is Crystal is referring to another article by Tony Freeman, which we have no link to or inkling of where to find. Oh dear!

I tend to agree with Crystal's main point. However because he is basically repeating truisms, the article is not very enlightening.

metal56
Posts: 3032
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 4:30 am

Post by metal56 » Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:33 am

Stephen Jones wrote:
However because he is basically repeating truisms, the article is not very enlightening.
Again, Stevie, for whom? Plus, note the date of the article.

English Today
Its global readership includes linguists, journalists, broadcasters, writers, publishers, teachers, advanced students of the language and others with a professional or personal interest in communication.

Post Reply