Race, US: class, UK.
Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2
The quote talks about conjugating speech, which talks directly about ebonics. Obama was making a statement about dialect and the need to speak Standard English. I only said that his comment approached that of Cosby. Is that naive? Do you disagree with that, or disagree with Obama's and Cosby's comment? Earlier, I didn't want to talk about race issues divorced from language on a language forum (but then you responded that they were always tied together anyhow).
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm
To equate using particular verb constructions with the practice of reading books is grotesquely ignorant. Barack would do well to read a book on elementary linguistics himself, or at the least a book on how to hire quaified speech writers.
IF 80% if black people use certain verb constructions, and 100% of white people use another kind, then using the white sociolect is speaking white.
IF 80% if black people use certain verb constructions, and 100% of white people use another kind, then using the white sociolect is speaking white.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 5:34 pm
Re: Race, US: class, UK.
I think that's a rather simplistic view and I suspect that Jennie went into considerably more detail than this.metal56 wrote:According to Jennifer Jenkins, in her book World English, the lack of acceptance of non-standard native forms of English seems to have connections with race, in the US, and with class, in the UK.
Would you also say that it seems that way?
Anyway in the States it's just as likely to be based on a form of class prejudice. White trash, blue collar, white collar, deep south, New York, upstate, etc, etc.
How better to simplisticly stereotype someones intelligence than to do the 'non-standard', pronunciation of their accent?