infinitive as subject

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:11 am

Another nice pair of examples there, lolwhites, but Lotus' comments make me hesitate a bit (a bit hesitant) to use (a bit hesitant using?!) them.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:08 am

Hmmmm. To me, I hesitate/I'm hesitant to + V sounds like "I'm reluctant to/would rather not..." while I'm hesitant + V-ing means "when I do this, I'm hesitant"

He was hesitant to cross the bridge - "Err, umm, do I really have to cross this bridge?"
He was hesitant crossing the bridge - "Whoops-a-daisy, careful now, slowly does it..."

Maybe it's just me.

scot
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 5:20 am

and in noun clauses?

Post by scot » Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:55 pm

what is the rule for using the infinitive as the subject of a noun clause? can you?

example:

I found out that going to work everyday is important.
I found out that to go to work everyday is important.

both ok but gerund is more natural? im an esl teacher needing to explain this to a confused rule-loving student so any angles on this would help.

thanks
scott

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:15 pm

Hi scot. I think that your example is covered by what Swan says; see the quote higher up the thread. Personally I find the gerund more natural here, but others may not agree.

Your student is probably confused precisely because (s)he is "rule loving"...

Post Reply