Use of 'like'

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Post Reply
john martin
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:12 am

Use of 'like'

Post by john martin » Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:39 am

This usage of 'like' appears in the Oxford Advanced learners dictionary.

Like (adj) having similar qualities or features.

"They're not twins, but they're very like"


I have never seen like used in this way before. I have only ever seen 'alike' used in this context.

What does anyone else think?
Thanks.

john martin
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 11:12 am

Post by john martin » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:12 am

I have just found the online version of the book


http://www.oup.com/oald-bin/web_getald7index1a.pl

Here it states:

adj. [only before noun] (formal) having similar qualities to another person or thing: a chance to meet people of like mind (= with similar interests and opinions) She responded in like manner.


The two examples given here appear in the 1995 version of the printed book, but my example above does not. There is also the addition of the phrase ' only before noun'.

Has a grammar usage changed or did Oxford make a mistake with the 95 printed version?

Stephen Jones
Posts: 1421
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 5:25 pm

Post by Stephen Jones » Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:10 am

Adjectives can be attributive or predicative. Most are both, but 'like' is not used in predicative position. If your dictionary said so it was wrong.

revel
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:21 am

Post by revel » Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:22 am

deleted
Last edited by revel on Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Anuradha Chepur
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: India

Post by Anuradha Chepur » Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:42 am

At the moment, I'm not bothered about the usage of 'like', but I wish to defend Oxford dictionary - the Merriam-Webster online says it too.
Main Entry: 3like
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, alteration of ilich, from Old English gel&#299;c like, alike, from ge-, associative prefix + l&#299;c body; akin to Old High German gil&#299;h like, alike, Lithuanian lygus like — more at co-
Date: 13th century
1 a: the same or nearly the same (as in appearance, character, or quantity) <suits of like design> —formerly used with as, unto, of<it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren — Heb 2:17(Authorized Version)> bchiefly British : closely resembling the subject or original <the portrait is very like>

revel
Posts: 533
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 8:21 am

Post by revel » Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:37 am

deleted
Last edited by revel on Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Wed Sep 12, 2007 8:40 am

Has anyone else come across the use of be like to mean say, as in I was like, "what?" and he was like, "no way!"?

Anuradha Chepur
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: India

Post by Anuradha Chepur » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:22 am

I have and I was irritated.

fluffyhamster
Posts: 3031
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again

Post by fluffyhamster » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:28 am

It functions as one way to report in more than just words. Why be irritated? How about 'went'?

Anuradha Chepur
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 8:33 am
Location: India

Post by Anuradha Chepur » Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:34 am

I mostly heard it used by Bollywood actors, whose English I'm not always impressed with. They must have picked it up in their US/UK shooting trips, and it makes them sound like wannabes.
He went, "....." is absolutely fine for me.

lolwhites
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2003 1:12 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by lolwhites » Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:30 pm

It's often used to convey emotion too, as in I was like (speaker adopts amazed expression) or I was like (speaker places hand over eyes groans). I can see how some people might find it lazy ir inarticulate, but it certainly isn't inexpressive!

Post Reply