What order is the grammatically correct one?

<b>Forum for the discussion of Applied Linguistics </b>

Moderators: Dimitris, maneki neko2, Lorikeet, Enrico Palazzo, superpeach, cecil2, Mr. Kalgukshi2

Andrew Patterson
Posts: 922
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

Post by Andrew Patterson » Tue Feb 03, 2004 8:52 am

I agree. Guideline may be a better term. I'm also not sure about the best term to describe the process. Abstraction? tangability? The point is that if the speaker is having trouble grading adjectives for abstraction, the listener probably will too, so the order in such cases is less important.

Andrew Patterson.
http://www.geocities.com/endipatterson/catenative.GIF

Norm Ryder
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:10 pm
Location: Canberra, Australia

Post by Norm Ryder » Thu Feb 05, 2004 9:22 am

Hi folks
I can't say whether this will help the discussion; but for what it's worth, the Collins Cobuild English Usage suggests the following order for adjectives:
1. qualitative [opinions, size, quality, age, shape (in that order)], 2. colour, 3. classifying adjective.

It also suggests that an adjective should be placed before a noun modifier in describing the noun (eg, "the French film industry"). Would that therefore suggest "white anglophone male"? or "white male anglophone"? I guess, as Larry suggests, it depends on what you want to stress.

But where to fit 'monolingual'? Is it a 'class' or a 'quality"? I guess it depends on whether your discussion has been contrasting monolinguals and multilinguals, in which case you've been setting up two classes. But maybe in Canada the classes are anglophone and francophone, in which case the class ... or are you contrasting male and female anglophones :?: :twisted:

I guess I'd start with "monolingual white anglophone male", and ask you to justify any change on the basis of a change of emphasis.

But it looks as if no-one's giving the poor guy much of chance, anyway - so who can come up with an 'h' word for the acronym WHAM :!:

User avatar
Lorikeet
Posts: 1374
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 4:14 am
Location: San Francisco, California
Contact:

Post by Lorikeet » Thu Feb 05, 2004 3:55 pm

How about "White homolinguistic anglophone male" :twisted: .

LarryLatham
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 6:33 pm
Location: Aguanga, California (near San Diego)

Post by LarryLatham » Thu Feb 05, 2004 5:53 pm

Perfect! :twisted: :lol:

Larry Latham

Peter
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:07 am
Location: Norway

Post by Peter » Thu Feb 19, 2004 5:45 pm

Is monoglot no longer acceptable?

Post Reply