|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scot47

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Posts: 15343
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is it because the USA is morally and ethically going down the tubes ? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
scot47 wrote: |
Is it because the USA is morally and ethically going down the tubes ? |
They've been sayin' this for years!
Warm regards,
fat_chris |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
....and perhaps they're right!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Javelin of Radiance

Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1187 Location: The West
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
The NRA proposal to post armed guards in the hallways is (to put it mildly) interesting. Education officials could hire Blackwater security agents, when they're not deployed in war zones, to patrol the primary school hallways. Sure some of them would be loose cannons and they'd make a few mistakes along the way, Blackwater's been known to waste a few hundred innocents now and then but collateral damage aside the kids would still be safe from the other crazy lunatics with guns. Teachers could even give their classrooms interesting names like "Green Zone," "Little Mogadishu," "North Caucasus," and "Sniper Alley" which, combined with the presence of heavily armed guards could add some authenticity to otherwise boring history lessons. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fat_chris
Joined: 10 Sep 2003 Posts: 3198 Location: Beijing
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
spiral78 wrote: |
....and perhaps they're right!! |
Warm regards,
fat_chris |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The NRA's solution: an armed guard in every school. Wow - wonder why no one has ever thought of that before?
Oh wait - they did.
Columbine April 20, 1999, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold killed 12 students and one teacher at Columbine. On the scene that day was Neil Gardner, an armed sheriff�s deputy who had been policing the school for almost two years.
As a CNN report describes, Gardner was eating lunch when he got a call from a custodian that he was needed in the school�s back parking lot. A few minutes later, he encountered Harris and the two exchanged gunfire. Harris was not hit and ran back inside the school. At that point, �Gardner called for additional units to respond to the south parking lot of Columbine High School. � While he was on the radio calling for assistance, five other Jefferson County deputies already were on their way, arriving only minutes after the first report of a �female down� at Columbine High School.� Later, Gardner saw Harris again, through a broken window. Once again, he fired. Once again, he didn�t hit him.
Though it�s possible Gardner distracted Harris enough to prevent additional carnage, that�s ultimately unknowable. What does seem certain is that a single armed security guard had little chance that day of preventing a pair of heavily armed killers from doing what they set out to do."
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
What does seem certain is that a single armed security guard had little chance that day of preventing a pair of heavily armed killers from doing what they set out to do." |
Dear John:
Amen.
Best regards,
spiral |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Javelin of Radiance

Joined: 01 Jul 2009 Posts: 1187 Location: The West
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My post above was made with a lot of sarcasm and cynicism. The idea that more guns in schools will prevent more shootings and save lives is, in my opinion, preposterous. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tttompatz

Joined: 06 Mar 2010 Posts: 1951 Location: Talibon, Bohol, Philippines
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So is a "constitutional right to bear arms" but the stupidity of that 200 year old amendment (this isn't 1791) in the modern era hasn't even made anyone blink.
Time for a detente between the parties and reduction of arms in the good 'ol US of A. (fat chance) then allow them to join the ranks of the civilized nations.
By simple comparison:
Canada had 554 (1.6/100,000) homicides.
UK had 722 (1.2/100,000).
France had 682 (1.1/100,000).
Japan had 442 (0.3 / 100,000)
And of the less civilized (3rd world) states:
USA - 12,996 (4.2/100,000).
Yemen - 990 (4.2/100,000).
Philippines - 4,947 (5.4/100,000).
Thailand - 3,307 (4.8/100,000).
India 40,752 (3.4/100,000).
Chile - 541 (3.2/100/000).
Argentina - 1360 (3.4/100,000).
Laos - 279 (4.6/100,000).
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yellowrose
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 9 Location: USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You have the right to practice your religion, but not if your religion involves human sacrifice. You have the right to free speech, but you can still be prosecuted for incitement or conspiracy, and you can be sued for libel. Every right is ...subject to limitation when it begins to threaten others, and the Supreme Court has affirmed that even though there is an individual right to gun ownership, the government can put reasonable restrictions on that right.
http://prospect.org/article/ten-arguments-gun-advocates-make-and-why-theyre-wrong#.UNhN7ge473w.facebook[/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
You have the right to practice your religion, but not if your religion involves human sacrifice. You have the right to free speech, but you can still be prosecuted for incitement or conspiracy, and you can be sued for libel. Every right is ...subject to limitation when it begins to threaten others, |
That's well-put. Thanks, yellowrose!
(I guess I'll put off sacrificing that annoying neighbor kid on the altar of the god of Boxing Day. Preparations weren't too far along...). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Yellowrose and spiral78,
Yup, very good examples - especially the first one:
"You have the right to practice your religion, but not if your religion involves human sacrifice."
since the religion of the NRA - The Worship of the Almighty Gun - does involve human sacrifice.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sashadroogie

Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 11061 Location: Moskva, The Workers' Paradise
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spiral78

Joined: 05 Apr 2004 Posts: 11534 Location: On a Short Leash
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bushmaster AR assault rifles: Legal in the US.
Kinder Eggs: Illegal in the US:
"There are two reasons why these delicious treats are illegal in the U.S. One reason is the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) claims that the toys are a choking hazard for small children. All of the toys are relatively small, and some contain even tinier pieces that need to be put together. Kinder Eggs have a warning on the package, in several languages, that they are only suitable for ages three and up, which should be enough to un-ban them.
Aside from children potentially choking on the toys, the real reason Kinder Eggs are banned is the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938. This Act prohibits the embedding of non-food items completely enclosed inside food items, unless the non-edible part has a functioning value. For example a lollipop or popsicle stick is not edible but is a useful handle. This Act was originally put into place to prevent the addition of hazardous items to processed food and has never been changed."
(Kinder Eggs have been related to 7 deaths in 20 years, worldwide)
. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sixthchild
Joined: 18 Apr 2012 Posts: 298 Location: East of Eden
|
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see in a side story related to this thread that a certain British presenter on C.N.N has been told by 40,000 residents of America to go back where he came from because he told the director of N.R.A that he was an "unbelieveably stupid man" in an interview. Apparently your opinion does not count for very much if you don't agree that everyone should be armed especially at schools.
Now we have firemen been shot and killed trying to put out fires! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|