| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
juststeven
Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 117
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Twisting In The Wind,
Surely, you must be joking! I know you only have a 'distance' degree from Indiana, (what was it, Philosophy or Comparative Religious Studies or probably Humanities/Liberal Arts) but you must know the plural of a noun!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carnac
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 310 Location: in my village in Oman ;-)
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Correctly, more than one of the same kind of fish (17guppies), the plural is fish. More than one of different kinds of fish (a shark, a tuna, a carp and a grouper) the plural is fishes.
What's the difference between a lawyer and a carp?
One's a bottom-dwelling scumsucker.
The other's a fish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| "Fishes" is the proper English plural form of "fish" that biologists use when speaking about two or more fish species, as in "There are over 25,000 fishes in the world" (meaning that there are over 25,000 fish species in the world). When speaking of two or more individual fish organisms, then the word "fish" is used, as in "There are several million fish in the species Gadus morhua" (meaning that G. morhua comprises several million individuals). To see both in action, consider the statement "There are twelve fish in this aquarium, representing five fishes" (meaning that the aquarium contains twelve individuals, some of the same species and some of different species, for a total of five species). |
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish
Yeah. I love my job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Brickerage
Joined: 25 Sep 2004 Posts: 431 Location: Shen Yang
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| juststeven wrote: |
Twisting In The Wind,
Surely, you must be joking! I know you only have a 'distance' degree from Indiana, (what was it, Philosophy or Comparative Religious Studies or probably Humanities/Liberal Arts) but you must know the plural of a noun!  |
The question here isn't about someones education, which seems a bit strange that it would be brought up here, talking about fish. Or in this case a computer mouse... which is known world-wide that we all call them mices....HELLO!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I see this confusion a lot with words like curriculum, virus, data, formula. Few people I know will use what I thought were the correct plural forms for these. And yet... |
Generally words introduced into English in the last sixty years or so take the standard English plurals.
It is almost never wrong to use the 's' plural in English, although I personally would always say curricula and formulae. (On the other hand I would always talk about computer viruses, and consider 'virii' to be an idiotic affectation).
Data is a non-count noun, and takes a singular verb like all non-count nouns. Media is best considered the same; incidentally we often use the singular as in phrases such as "through the medium of television" or "the print medium" or of course "The medium is the message".
The plural of 'computer mouse' is 'computer mice', except in 'Tom and Jerry' cartoons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ben Round de Bloc
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 1946
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Stephen Jones wrote: |
| The plural of 'computer mouse' is 'computer mice', except in 'Tom and Jerry' cartoons. |
I'm afraid not everyone is in complete agreement on that one.
| Quote: |
It is called a mouse primarily because the cord on early models resembled the rodent's tail, and also because the motion of the pointer on the screen can be mouselike. In popular usage, the plural can be either mice or mouses.
From Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_mouse |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
To quote for alt.usage
| Quote: |
Markus Laker reports from the U.K.: "In the early eighties, a
few people did selfconsciously say 'mouses', but the traditional
plural 'mice' gained ground rapidly and is now more or less
universal here." |
So it's mice except in Tom and Jeryy cartoons and the USA. But waitt - same place ain't it :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homersimpson
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 569 Location: Kagoshima
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both "fishes" and "mice" are correct usage.
Main Entry: 1fish
Pronunciation: 'fish
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural fish or fish�es
Usage: often attributive
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English fisc; akin to Old High German fisc fish, Latin piscis
1 a : an aquatic animal -- usually used in combination <starfish> <cuttlefish> b : any of numerous cold-blooded strictly aquatic craniate vertebrates that include the bony fishes and usually the cartilaginous and jawless fishes and that have typically an elongated somewhat spindle-shaped body terminating in a broad caudal fin, limbs in the form of fins when present at all, and a 2-chambered heart by which blood is sent through thoracic gills to be oxygenated
Main Entry: 1mouse
Pronunciation: 'maus
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural mice /'mIs/
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English mus; akin to Old High German mus mouse, Latin mus, Greek mys mouse, muscle
1 : any of numerous small rodents (as of the genus Mus) with pointed snout, rather small ears, elongated body, and slender tail
2 : a timid person
3 : a dark-colored swelling caused by a blow; specifically : BLACK EYE
4 : a small mobile manual device that controls movement of the cursor and selection of functions on a computer display |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
homersimpson
Joined: 14 Feb 2003 Posts: 569 Location: Kagoshima
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I forgot to add, apparently for us humans there is an exception:
Main Entry: 1peo�ple
Pronunciation: 'pE-p&l
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural people
Etymology: Middle English peple, from Old French peuple, from Latin populus
1 plural : human beings making up a group or assembly or linked by a common interest
2 plural : HUMAN BEINGS, PERSONS -- often used in compounds instead of persons <salespeople>
3 plural : the members of a family or kinship
4 plural : the mass of a community as distinguished from a special class <disputes between the people and the nobles> -- often used by Communists to distinguish Communists from other people
5 plural peoples : a body of persons that are united by a common culture, tradition, or sense of kinship, that typically have common language, institutions, and beliefs, and that often constitute a politically organized group |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carnac
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 310 Location: in my village in Oman ;-)
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And, thanks to Steven Pinker for bringing this up, the plural of Walkman?
And, the plural of syllabus? (Who, I wonder, will respond "syllabi"?)
Who but English teachers, huh? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'll use syllabi simply because syllabuses sounds like I'm having a fit when s-s-s-saying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hobo
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And try saying it with a lisp.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guy Courchesne

Joined: 10 Mar 2003 Posts: 9650 Location: Mexico City
|
Posted: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| thyllabutheth? That's too cruel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
merlin

Joined: 10 May 2004 Posts: 582 Location: Somewhere between Camelot and NeverNeverLand
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
carnac
Joined: 30 Jul 2004 Posts: 310 Location: in my village in Oman ;-)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote:
What are the plurals of 'octopus', 'hippopotamus', 'syllabus'?
English words of Latin or Greek origin have rather unpredictable plurals, and each one usually depends on how well established that particular word is. It may also depend on whether the Latin or Greek form of the plural is either easily recognizable or pleasant to the speaker of English.
Although it is often supposed that octopi is the 'correct' plural of octopus, and it has been in use for longer than the usual Anglicized plural octopuses, it in fact originates as an error. Octopus is not a simple Latin word of the second declension, but a Latinized form of the Greek word oktopous, and its 'correct' plural would logically be octopodes.
Other words ending in -us show a very varied pattern. Like octopi, the plural hippopotami is now generally taken to be either funny or absurdly pedantic, and the usual plural is hippopotamuses. Common usage appears to indicate a slight preference for termini rather than terminuses, but syllabuses rather than syllabi.(emphasis added) Other usual forms include cacti and gladioli, and our files at the dictionary department show scarcely any examples of nucleuses or funguses. (Omnibi is simply a joke, and quite ungrammatical in Latin!)
Among words ending in -um it seems worth drawing attention to the word curricula, plural of curriculum, and warning against confusion with the adjective curricular (as in extra-curricular).
End quote
http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutgrammar/plurals?view=uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|