|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wildchild wrote: |
I am trying to show that languages and "enunciation" change with time. Normally, language change is normal, it happens, to everyone, even the "proper" folks. Quite a few century ago, someone surely said something very similar about think to what you have said above about gonna. For example, those who said tonga would say that:
Think appears to simply be the result of poor enunciation on the part of people who were less educated and/or lower on the economic ladder - well, that and people simply talking faster than their mouths are capable of properly enunciating the words.
Chancellor says:
Quote: |
Besides, on what planet is the source of a word relevant to how one pronounces the word in the context of this thread? |
Dude, see the door, you're fired How? a lot. Why? two lots. Would any one of my more articulate colleagues care to help?
Kind of funny that you should ask that, given that you appealed to source yourself.
Quote: |
I think it came along much earlier than that - at least as far back as the 19th century. |
|
But you were trying to use a protoindoeuropean word to show changes in enunciation (which I think you're confusing with pronunciation), not an English word. Most of us here know that "gonna" is a poorly-enunciated version of "going to," whereas your example is part of the etymology of the English word "think." If you want to try to claim that enunciation is irrelevant (which really is what you're saying here), then do it with variants of the same word in the same language instead of trying to go back to a theoretical protoindoeuropean langauge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wildchild

Joined: 14 Nov 2005 Posts: 519 Location: Puebla 2009 - 2010
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chancellor says:
Quote: |
But you were trying to use a protoindoeuropean word to show changes in enunciation (which I think you're confusing with pronunciation), not an English word. |
The PIE word became your English one. Your right, I am confused by enunciation v. pronunciation. Care to clarify?
Chancellor says:
Quote: |
Most of us here know that "gonna" is a poorly-enunciated version of "going to," |
and going to is a "poorly-enunciated" version of its predecessor. So you see, according to your philosophy, we're all speaking a f*cked up form of OE. I don't care to make value judgments about the enunciation of others, we all enunciate in different ways, but to claim that one way is proper, superior, correct or better is quite chauvinist and ignorant. Um, as I have said before in this thread, all they need to do is (the folks who say gonna) is gain the loyalty and control of the military; then guess who is gonna decide which enunciation is the correct one. But don't worry, Chancellor, after the revolution, I won't denounce you.
Quote: |
If you want to try to claim that enunciation is irrelevant (which really is what you're saying here) |
Yeah, I think I may have once convinced myself that enunciation is irrelevant, but then I quickly realised that folks might have trouble to understand me if I get too creative Also, "bad" enunciation may not get me invited to tea at chez Chancellor, so I'll take a class in "proper" English, that way I can please your ears over a biscuit.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chancellor
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 Posts: 1337 Location: Ji'an, China - if you're willing to send me cigars, I accept donations :)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JZer wrote: |
Quote: |
I am trying to show that languages and "enunciation" change with time. Normally, language change is normal, it happens, to everyone, even the "proper" folks. Quite a few century ago, someone surely said something very similar about think to what you have said above about gonna. For example, those who said tonga would say that: |
Agreed, Chancellor does not seem to be the brightest guy on the block. |
Yes, well, if your standard of brightness is based on blindly following the latest linguistic theories and fanatically holding onto what amounts to linguistic relativism, you're right. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JZer
Joined: 16 Jan 2005 Posts: 3898 Location: Pittsburgh
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
we all enunciate in different ways, but to claim that one way is proper, superior, correct or better is quite chauvinist and ignorant. |
I am really curious what Chancellor is using to justify that one enunciation is better than another. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
philyyy
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 93 Location: Wroclaw
|
Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2006 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Like is only used by the more unintelligent members of society. If I met someone who was a "liker", I'd have grave doubts that I could be ars"" with them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AllOne
Joined: 13 Aug 2006 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
like, i like dunno like the word i like hear here is 'yeah' and 'yeah?' and when I like heard all these like school teachers yeah like using yeah i like felt like yeahlling |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Twelvetongue
Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I'm a Californian and as a teaching assistant I kept on pronouncing "since" as "sense", utterly confusing the older teacher. I claim to abhor Valspeak, but low and behold, I have a Californian accent. It was a classic case of Jeff Spiccoli and Mr. Hand.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SueH
Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Posts: 1022 Location: Northern Italy
|
Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
oh shet, I thought revolving vowels were going the other way! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aramas
Joined: 13 Feb 2004 Posts: 874 Location: Slightly left of Centre
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kiwis dispense with vowels altogether. They make bad pns, stick pns in things , cook in frying pns and write with ball-point pns. They also have sx, sometimes leaving their sx on and sometimes sx times in a row, but too much of it sx.
They're also quite sensitive about it, and are prone to saying things like "Not pn, pn! Are you df?"
It's a very economical and versatile approach. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have no problem with pronunciation differences , slang and so on but there is one term that really gets to me ' innit'
The other day I met a Chinese guy in the gym.Spoke the best language that I have ever heard since I came to China.He had a London accent but for some reason at the end of EVERY sentence he would utter 'innit'
I haven't been in the UK properly for a few years but surely the youth aren't going around still doing Ali G impressions? That's just soooo sad ! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mavis the Fat Fairy

Joined: 21 Sep 2006 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
philyyy wrote: |
Like is only used by the more unintelligent members of society. If I met someone who was a "liker", I'd have grave doubts that I could be ars"" with them. |
Not always true - my ex is a surgeon and one of the most intellegent people i know, yet he says 'like' almost every other word! Possibly one of the reasons we split up... there are some things you just can't live with
Quote: |
I haven't been in the UK properly for a few years but surely the youth aren't going around still doing Ali G impressions? That's just soooo sad ! |
Sad but true I'm afraid.
Quote: |
They also have sx, sometimes leaving their sx on and sometimes sx times in a row, but too much of it sx. |
that reminded me of when I went out for a meal in Australia with some friends. The kiwi waitress showed us to the table and then asked us 'do you want sex?' We all stared at her blankly, a bit stunned. It took a few repeats and waving of place mats by her before we understood she'd meant 'do you want six?' )ie places. Gosh, how we laughed... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gregor

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 842 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
The "like" phenomenon is indeed annoying. I seriously doubt that it will ever - EVER - enter "standard" English, as I see it as a stammer of speech, much like saying "um" (in Latin American Spanish, "este", in Chinese...I can't remember, but there is a word). I also used to hear "pues" a lot (substitute "well" in English, as in, "What do you think of Club America?"
"Well/pues, they could use some work this year..."
But it's funny to read all these old fogey posts about the decline of the language and educational standards and so on. Socrates used to write about the youth of HIS day, and the decline of educational standards back THEN.
There's nothing you can do about the march of time, especially in an unregulated language like English. Like it or not, "gonna" (even thus spelled) will likely become a proper word one day, as will "dunno" for "don't know." Hell, y'all, contractions were probably cursed at one point, as well, don't you reckon?
What I hate VERY MUCH is the fact that "nuclear" can be correctly pronounced, according to some dictionaries these days, as "nuculer" (thank Ronald Reagan and both George Bushes for that).
My pet peeve in modern speech, which I first noticed in 1992 Australia, was a rising tone after every flippin' sentence? It makes everything sound like a question? And for a long time, I thought I was meant to answer, but didn't really understand what the question was?
Surely, most of you have encountered that by now. I won't even do it as a joke. Even JOKING about it pisses me off.
Same with "like" for that matter. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
furiousmilksheikali

Joined: 31 Jul 2006 Posts: 1660 Location: In a coffee shop, splitting a 30,000 yen tab with Sekiguchi.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gregor wrote: |
My pet peeve in modern speech, which I first noticed in 1992 Australia, was a rising tone after every flippin' sentence? It makes everything sound like a question? And for a long time, I thought I was meant to answer, but didn't really understand what the question was?
|
Not only do a lot of Australians tend to use this rising intonation at the end of sentences but so do a lot of people who teach TEFL. I think it develops as an unconscious continual questioning of the student about whether they understand which eventually becomes an habitual part of that person's speech. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 1:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
not an English word. Most of us here know that "gonna" is a poorly-enunciated version of "going to," |
No, I believe that you and Sally are the only ones reading this thread who hold such a quaint idea.
'gonna' is a the orthographic representation of the standard pronunciation when the verb is used as a semi-modal in American English. Go to a corpus of American conversations, do a search and listen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sheeba
Joined: 17 Jun 2004 Posts: 1123
|
Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2006 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
not an English word. Most of us here know that "gonna" is a poorly-enunciated version of "going to," |
Jeesh. I didn't notice that idiotic quote ! Must be British. My fellow Brits can be embarrassingly naive sometimes.Many claim that from an elocution standpoint, that modern speech is becoming increasingly slovenly.There is in fact, no evidence to suggest that the degree of obscuration and elision, is markedly greater now than it has been for centuries . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|