Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

comma question
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
baby predator



Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 176
Location: London, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:10 am    Post subject: comma question Reply with quote

Can anyone help me out on the issue of placing a comma after "Now"?

For example:

"Now, have the students open their book to page 5."

"Now, I'd like to introduce a new topic..."

The normally reliable Swan says there should be a comma in both of the above examples, but my colleagues who used to work at OUP vehemently disagree. Any opinions? I'd especially like to know what the American English convention is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dr.J



Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 304
Location: usually Japan

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A comma implies that a new topic is being introduced. No comma implies that it is an order or part of a set of instructions (as opposed to "before").
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
naturegirl321



Joined: 04 May 2003
Posts: 9041
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought that a comma could also mean a pause. "I like apples, too."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:06 pm    Post subject: To comma or not to comma Reply with quote

There are certain times when commas are required ( in lists to replace the "and", when using direct address, to prevent ambiguity in meaning, etc.), but a lot of the time, using or not using them is really the writer's choice. Most often, they're used to indicate a slight pause, and whether there should be a pause or not is frequently up to the writer. That's my opnion, anyway.
Regards,
John (eight commas)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ka-CHING!



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 102

PostPosted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe the comma is optional. Use it if you wish to pause at that point in the sentence; omit it if you think the sentence should be read with no pause. The comma would be mandatory for a longer introductory element.

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_commaint.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

See if you can punctuate the following so that it makes sense:

Where James had had had had Joe had had had
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:02 am    Post subject: I've been had Reply with quote

Dear Marcoregano,
How's this?

Where James had had, " had had", Joe had had, " had".

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Top marks sir! I must say it gave me a slight headache the first time I came across it....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
leby26



Joined: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 68

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 4:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I might be wrong, but I would say:

Quote:
"Now, have the students open their book to page 5."

"Now, I'd like to introduce a new topic..."

The first sentence should not have a comma after 'Now', but the second sentence should remain as it is.

Also, as someone suggested:

Quote:
I thought that a comma could also mean a pause. "I like apples, too."


I don't think so. In this instance a pause is awkward both in speech and in writing, as far as I know Confused However, I'm only judging these on sight, since I'm not a teacher - but I do know that I would get those painfully corrected (red circles and the dreaded 'awk' in the margins) on any written assignment for my English courses in University Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baby predator



Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 176
Location: London, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm really after a more precise reply. At work, I follow fairly strict rules on using commas: separating two independent clauses, after an opening phrase, etc. However, I've found nothing conclusive about my question in the immense amounts of online literature.

If no one can venture a definite answer, can anyone point me to a good reference site for posting such a question?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marcoregano



Joined: 19 May 2003
Posts: 872
Location: Hong Kong

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my humble opinion both commas are quite correct, as a pause after 'now' is appropriate in both cases. However, in the first case some might actually say the sentence 'without' a pause. I guess this makes the first comma optional, but to me it looks odd without it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guest of Japan



Joined: 28 Feb 2003
Posts: 1601
Location: Japan

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I humbly opine as marcoregano.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Jones



Joined: 21 Feb 2003
Posts: 4124

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 9:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
At work, I follow fairly strict rules on using commas:


Well you shouldn't. Because the rules aren't that strict.

With regard to your example, in both sentences it all depends on the meaning of 'now'. If 'now' means 'at this time' then it should not be followed by a comma. If it has its temporal sense weakened and is used " As an important or noteworthy point in an argument or proof or in a series of statements: you should be told; as must be admitted; on the other hand." to quote the SOED, then a comma is more or less obligatory.

The two sentences you give can be interpreted either way, depending on whether the comma is present or not, which is an excellent example of the need for commas.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
johnslat



Joined: 21 Jan 2003
Posts: 13859
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA

PostPosted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 10:16 pm    Post subject: Occasionally a big difference Reply with quote

Dear Stephen,

"Because the rules aren't that strict. "

Amen, he chorused.

But I used to like to use this one to show how a comma CAN make a big difference:

1. Mom calling me to dinner

a) It's time to eat, John.

2. And, on that desert island, when all other food has run out - well, then

b) It's time to eat John.

Regards,
John
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baby predator



Joined: 12 May 2003
Posts: 176
Location: London, United Kingdom

PostPosted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 2:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like this one, which demonstrates the point of placing a comma before 'and' in a series.

I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God.

As for following rules, there is a tremendous need for them when you write educational materials. I used never to be sure where a comma should go - was it during natural pauses, was it to separate clauses? My usage was totally inconsistent - as is most people's. We happily follow the rules to capitalize the first letter in a sentence and to place a period at the end; making our writing that much more comprehensible. Why not do the same with commas?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Teaching Jobs in China
Teaching Jobs in China