View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
baby predator

Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 176 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 4:10 am Post subject: comma question |
|
|
Can anyone help me out on the issue of placing a comma after "Now"?
For example:
"Now, have the students open their book to page 5."
"Now, I'd like to introduce a new topic..."
The normally reliable Swan says there should be a comma in both of the above examples, but my colleagues who used to work at OUP vehemently disagree. Any opinions? I'd especially like to know what the American English convention is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dr.J

Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 304 Location: usually Japan
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
A comma implies that a new topic is being introduced. No comma implies that it is an order or part of a set of instructions (as opposed to "before"). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
naturegirl321

Joined: 04 May 2003 Posts: 9041 Location: home sweet home
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that a comma could also mean a pause. "I like apples, too." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:06 pm Post subject: To comma or not to comma |
|
|
There are certain times when commas are required ( in lists to replace the "and", when using direct address, to prevent ambiguity in meaning, etc.), but a lot of the time, using or not using them is really the writer's choice. Most often, they're used to indicate a slight pause, and whether there should be a pause or not is frequently up to the writer. That's my opnion, anyway.
Regards,
John (eight commas) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ka-CHING!
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Posts: 102
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2004 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the comma is optional. Use it if you wish to pause at that point in the sentence; omit it if you think the sentence should be read with no pause. The comma would be mandatory for a longer introductory element.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_commaint.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marcoregano

Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 872 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
See if you can punctuate the following so that it makes sense:
Where James had had had had Joe had had had |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:02 am Post subject: I've been had |
|
|
Dear Marcoregano,
How's this?
Where James had had, " had had", Joe had had, " had".
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marcoregano

Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 872 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 3:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Top marks sir! I must say it gave me a slight headache the first time I came across it.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
leby26

Joined: 30 Jan 2004 Posts: 68
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I might be wrong, but I would say:
Quote: |
"Now, have the students open their book to page 5."
"Now, I'd like to introduce a new topic..." |
The first sentence should not have a comma after 'Now', but the second sentence should remain as it is.
Also, as someone suggested:
Quote: |
I thought that a comma could also mean a pause. "I like apples, too." |
I don't think so. In this instance a pause is awkward both in speech and in writing, as far as I know However, I'm only judging these on sight, since I'm not a teacher - but I do know that I would get those painfully corrected (red circles and the dreaded 'awk' in the margins) on any written assignment for my English courses in University  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baby predator

Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 176 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the suggestions, but I'm really after a more precise reply. At work, I follow fairly strict rules on using commas: separating two independent clauses, after an opening phrase, etc. However, I've found nothing conclusive about my question in the immense amounts of online literature.
If no one can venture a definite answer, can anyone point me to a good reference site for posting such a question? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marcoregano

Joined: 19 May 2003 Posts: 872 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
In my humble opinion both commas are quite correct, as a pause after 'now' is appropriate in both cases. However, in the first case some might actually say the sentence 'without' a pause. I guess this makes the first comma optional, but to me it looks odd without it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guest of Japan

Joined: 28 Feb 2003 Posts: 1601 Location: Japan
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
I humbly opine as marcoregano. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen Jones
Joined: 21 Feb 2003 Posts: 4124
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
At work, I follow fairly strict rules on using commas: |
Well you shouldn't. Because the rules aren't that strict.
With regard to your example, in both sentences it all depends on the meaning of 'now'. If 'now' means 'at this time' then it should not be followed by a comma. If it has its temporal sense weakened and is used " As an important or noteworthy point in an argument or proof or in a series of statements: you should be told; as must be admitted; on the other hand." to quote the SOED, then a comma is more or less obligatory.
The two sentences you give can be interpreted either way, depending on whether the comma is present or not, which is an excellent example of the need for commas. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
johnslat

Joined: 21 Jan 2003 Posts: 13859 Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2004 10:16 pm Post subject: Occasionally a big difference |
|
|
Dear Stephen,
"Because the rules aren't that strict. "
Amen, he chorused.
But I used to like to use this one to show how a comma CAN make a big difference:
1. Mom calling me to dinner
a) It's time to eat, John.
2. And, on that desert island, when all other food has run out - well, then
b) It's time to eat John.
Regards,
John |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baby predator

Joined: 12 May 2003 Posts: 176 Location: London, United Kingdom
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2004 2:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like this one, which demonstrates the point of placing a comma before 'and' in a series.
I'd like to thank my parents, Ayn Rand and God.
As for following rules, there is a tremendous need for them when you write educational materials. I used never to be sure where a comma should go - was it during natural pauses, was it to separate clauses? My usage was totally inconsistent - as is most people's. We happily follow the rules to capitalize the first letter in a sentence and to place a period at the end; making our writing that much more comprehensible. Why not do the same with commas? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|