|
Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kidkensei
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:31 pm Post subject: Aeon, Amity or Interac ? |
|
|
First off, definitely not trolling. Not really sure what trolling is but I;m pretty sure I'm not doin it. Nope, no trollin goin on in this forum.
My question for you all experienced English Alts and Teachers out there is this,
If you were going to spend your first year as a naive English teacher all over again and you were only given these 3 options, which company would you choose?
Cheers
Kensei |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AEON runs Amity, so there are really only 2 options. With not a bad reputation, with apartment rent subsidized (capped), and with lesson plans handed to you, I'd say of the choices you gave, go with AEON.
Need some background on yourself to help choose for you (which I really don't like to do). What are your goals, oh naive first-timer?
And, why have you disregarded the JET programme? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kidkensei
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Glenski,
Thanks for the advice. I haven't ruled JET out but its just that they don't begin hiring again until august.
My goals like any naive virgin gaijin English teacher is to get rich and have many beautiful japanese girls at my side fanning me down everywhere I go.
On a more serious note, what motivates me to be an english teacher is the responsibility I will have to others who want to learn and pursue their goals. I want to be in the position where I am able to see progress at the individual level and in the class as well. I'm starting to wonder whether a position as an ALT who just takes commands would give me this satisfaction.
A recruiter said to me that because Eikawas are a business there approach to learning is negative. Its all about gain and profits. They made it sound like learning for its own sake is something that only happens in the public school system.
If Eikawas and Eikawa students put more pressure on teachers to help them succeed because its a business venture then why would this be such a bad thing??
What satisfies you as a teacher Glenski?? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The pressure on eikaiwa teachers is not to help students progress but to increase company profits. This can mean putting students into inappropriate classes because it fits their schedules, teaching mixed ability classes as it is more profitable than splitting the class etc. and holding weekly business meetings with the school management where one is exhorted to recommend that students buy into the current campaign (eg for extra telephone based lessons or whatever), with league tables of schools and teachers posted on the staffroom walls, to encourage diligence in signing students up for this months campaign.
Lessons and materials may be oriented towards giving students the impression of progress (through the practicing of set rote 'conversations) rather than by encouraging any understanding or working knowledge of how English works. I was once told by a trainer that lessons were like baseball pitches, the teacher was the pitcher and the aim was that the student left the class feeling that they had scored a home run. This is superb advice if the object is to maximise student goodfeeling and thus the chance of them signing up for more lessons but is less useful if the object is to help them learn to play at baseball.
On the other hand teaching methods in many parts of the state sector have hardly progressed from the grammar translation method. At least eikaiwa students learn to speak, if only in the context of prescribed 'conversations'.
Last edited by stillnosheep on Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:29 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kidkensei
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent advice stillnosheep.
How do you deal with mixed ability in your classes? Do you divide the class during exercises? Could you use the kids with higher abilities to the advantage of the others?
Aaron |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Glenski

Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 12844 Location: Hokkaido, JAPAN
|
Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kidkensei wrote: |
Hey Glenski,
Thanks for the advice. I haven't ruled JET out but its just that they don't begin hiring again until august. |
"Begin hiring"??? The applications are due this month or December for August next year, so in effect, they have already begun hiring for 2009-10. If you simply meant that you don't want to wait that long to know about being accepted and coming here, ok, but might as well put your hat in the ring.
Quote: |
On a more serious note, what motivates me to be an english teacher is the responsibility I will have to others who want to learn and pursue their goals. I want to be in the position where I am able to see progress at the individual level and in the class as well. I'm starting to wonder whether a position as an ALT who just takes commands would give me this satisfaction. |
Some ALTs don't just take commands from the JTE. As they say in JET, every situation is different. Unfortunately, you can't choose the good situations.
Goals? High school kids have none beyond passing the horrid college entrance exams.
Quote: |
A recruiter said to me that because Eikawas are a business there approach to learning is negative. Its all about gain and profits. They made it sound like learning for its own sake is something that only happens in the public school system. |
Learning for its own sake is what happens (if at all) when people voluntarily sign up for classes on their own. That's eikaiwa. I'm not saying all eikaiwa students are motivated to learn. Probably most just want to kill time, socialize (with each other or with a foreigner), etc., but at least there's a better chance, IMO, of self-motivation there.
Quote: |
If Eikawas and Eikawa students put more pressure on teachers to help them succeed because its a business venture then why would this be such a bad thing?? |
Aside from the many negative reports on eikaiwa life (and I hope you have understood them), you should read this.
http://www.eltnews.com/features/special/015a.shtml
Quote: |
What satisfies you as a teacher Glenski?? |
Many things, but everybody has to start somewhere. I have gone from eikaiwa to PT teaching at a HS to FT teaching (not ALT) at a HS to university job. Too difficult to say because of the variety of the job. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
degolasse

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To answer the original question, if I were to do it all over as a newbie, I would have picked Interac again. I say this solely because I have little interest in teaching at an Eikaiwa, and my job through Interac at a Junior High was thoroughly satisfying. Above Interac though I would have chosen JET, mainly because I would have returned home with a little bit of money for doing the same job.
Yup, Interac has it's downfalls, and like most companies who hire overseas, you'll hear countless complaints about them. Know these and be prepared for them. However, in the end, Interac gave me absolutely everything they promised me during my contract and I had few actual complaints about them.
In my position as an ALT, I took commands from no one. I worked with a Japanese teacher and together we planned lessons and taught the classes. Sometimes I had little to do, sometimes I ran the show. On the students part, there was no learning for the sake of learning. Like someone else said, they memorize to pass the exam. However, if you pay attention, you'll find a few students out there who actually enjoy studying English and want more than just the answers to the test. Of my 400 students, I may have had 30, but my daily conversations with them and the progress I saw in them over a year was enough for my job to be very satisfying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AgentMulderUK

Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Posts: 360 Location: Concrete jungle (Tokyo)
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just to counter the above post, my experience of that despatch company is that they are mostly a bunch of insidious incompetent liars.
I will not forgive them and continue to go out of my way to warn others of their nature. Others may disagree, but I see no point in pushing young people into something that has resulted in unhappiness on so many occasions on these boards alone.
Do I sound bitter and twisted? Yes with good reason.
As for Aeon, I have yet to read anything really negative about them. Far better organisation, from what friends have told me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spidr245
Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is Interac really that bad? I've seen Flufflyhamster's post and he has positive things to say about them. AgentMulderUK (or anyone else willing to give input), if you could expand please to give those of us new to this a better understanding. I'm pretty new to this and I would like to know your reasons for not liking Interac. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dipso
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 Posts: 194 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a good friend who worked for Interac in the Kanto region. She was hardly ever paid on time and/or in full. On many occasions she only received half her salary on the day it was due - the rest followed a few weeks later. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnosheep

Joined: 01 Mar 2004 Posts: 2068 Location: eslcafe
|
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kidkensei wrote: |
How do you deal with mixed ability in your classes? Do you divide the class during exercises? Could you use the kids with higher abilities to the advantage of the others? |
It depends.
Occasionally, but only if the difference is large and the class neatly divides into two groups.
Yes, definitely, whether by using the best student as an assistant teacher helping the less able group, and rewarding said assistant teacher with some one-on-one teaching while both groups get on with an exercise, or, with younger kids, (3-6 y.o) letting the little ones learn from the older and/or more advanced ones by copying their verbal and physical responses. With young kids mixed ability is not really a problem, at this level it really is about learning via English saturated play. At the next level (8-14) it can become much more difficult, IMHO. With adults it is still difficult, but without the classroom management problems. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
spidr245 wrote: |
Is Interac really that bad? I've seen Flufflyhamster's post and he has positive things to say about them. |
Bear in mind that my experience with them was years ago, and that they may have had to become somewhat cut-throat (and therefore more like truly nastier dispatchers) since then. I wonder though if the complaints of e.g. Dipso's friend resulted from misunderstanding the nature and full implications of indirect hire/pay and/or having to pay back accrued debt at ultimately the company's convenience or whim. (I have written quite a few times about both issues, as a search for and reading of previous posts with keyword 'Interac' and maybe also 'RCS' with me fluffyhamster as author will reveal). I would be surprised though if their selection/interview and training had become less thorough (compared to other dispatchers), or they had started to become too intrusive and micro-managing. They were certainly the best dispatcher that I worked for (bear in mind though that I was fortunate enough at that time to not need to borrow money from them - this can complicate matters and obviously gives the employer additional leverage to use as desired or required). But again, I would imagine that they would be more generous than RCS WAS - still is? - and perhaps have an automated advance system like Borderlink (the only good thing about those nasty critters) to get around the need to beg with empty bowl like some orphaned pauper (I feel something like Stewie's response in the Family Guy's take on Oliver Twist coming on!). [Edit: Just want to clarify something: RCS was not that generous with advances, and about halfway through the year eventually stopped giving them and at the same time called in way too much of the loans it had made, to every AET. But at least this beat BL, who, whilst they were willing to advance appreicably more (say 35-40,000 yen per week as opposed to RCS's 20,000 yen), based on each weekly timesheet submitted/week or completed work, then proceeded to deduct the total amount of the loan wihout fail each and every payday, effectively reducing the AET to half-pay or less (especially if BL then screwed the AET further with dodgy/unfair deductions) - I surely wasn't the only AET who'd gone into the job broke from apartment contract renewals etc and had had to borrow the princely sum of @120,000 yen prior to the first payday after working two months, which left me with only 120-130,000 yen every month thereafter, making life generally difficult and things like medical insurance impossible to pay for. That should be warning enough now about BL's awful practices!].
Generally I do not actually fully recommend dispatch work (at least, not without lots of provisos attached) and probably never have, but then, eikaiwa work can be or become a bit of a drag sometimes (e.g. always working evenings and Saturdays), as can the competition for ostensibly better (better-paying) jobs.
Last edited by fluffyhamster on Sat Dec 20, 2008 1:07 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
spidr245
Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fluffyhamster wrote: |
spidr245 wrote: |
Is Interac really that bad? I've seen Flufflyhamster's post and he has positive things to say about them. |
Bear in mind that my experience with them was years ago, and that they may have had to become somewhat cut-throat (and therefore more like truly nastier dispatchers) since then. I wonder though if the complaints of e.g. Dipso's friend resulted from misunderstanding the nature and full implications of indirect hire/pay and/or having to pay back accrued debt at ultimately the company's convenience or whim. (I have written quite a few times about both issues, as a search for and reading of previous posts with keyword 'Interac' and maybe also 'RCS' with me fluffyhamster as author will reveal). I would be surprised though if their selection/interview and training had become less thorough (compared to other dispatchers), or they had started to become too intrusive and micro-managing. They were certainly the best dispatcher that I worked for (bear in mind though that I was fortunate enough at that time to not need to borrow money from them - this can complicate matters and obviously gives the employer additional leverage to use as desired or required). But again, I would imagine that they would be more generous than RCS WAS - still is? - and perhaps have an automated advance system like Borderlink (the only good thing about those nasty critters) to get around the need to beg with empty bowl like some orphaned pauper (I feel something like Stewie's response in the Family Guy's take on Oliver Twist coming on!).
Generally I do not actually fully recommend dispatch work (at least, not without lots of provisos attached) and probably never have, but then, eikaiwa work can be or become a bit of a drag sometimes (e.g. always working evenings and Saturdays), as can the competition for ostensibly better (better-paying) jobs. |
I can understand that. But sometimes, you have to get your foot in the door one way or another. But if I do go with Interac, then I will most likely avoid taking out any loans. Although, I am looking at a few different places at the moment. I'm trying to go directly there instead of through dispatch, but when you do not really have much experience, it's hard to compete. And also since I'm here in the US rather than in Japan, that makes things harder. JET has been considered, but it's already past the deadline when I last checked.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cornishmuppet
Joined: 27 Mar 2004 Posts: 642 Location: Nagano, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think what needs to be remembered with dispatch companies is that it isn't the job (working in a school) that sucks, but the insidious, toad-like middleman who gets in the way, takes half your money and causes you all sorts of problems that don't need to exist, doesn't pay health insurance, doesn't pay on time, whatever.
Whereas, with eikawas, while your boss might be lovely, you'll still be working a ton of classtime hours a week, often to kids whose parents push them into being there (its usually only the adults that WANT to be there), and therefore have very little motivation, you'll have very little holiday, and you might get criticised for actually trying to teach when all the company wants you to do is keep the students happy enough to stop them leaving.
I'd choose Interac, though its a personal choice. The job or the administration. At least with a dispatch company you might get a chance to see a bit of Japan while you're here, and the focus will actually be on teaching english rather than selling. Of course, you might come across some negetivity towards ALTs, but thats only because most dispatch companies employ any bum they can get their hands on. Go across to bigdaikon.com for a view of the supposed cream of the ALT crop.
Eikawas can be good. I worked in a great one in Italy, which had a syllabus, end of course exams, progress reports, homework that was actually done. Its only in Japan that I lost my faith in them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
fluffyhamster
Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 3292 Location: UK > China > Japan > UK again
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nice post, cornish! I'd just add that sometimes (not often, but unfortunately just occassionally enough), not only the dispatch middle-men toads but also the actual school (JHS)/job can suck too - knowing that you will have few sympathisers and certainly few if any friends at the average BOE (otherwise they'd just hire directly, wouldn't they!), some JTEs and/or vice-principals etc will be as rude and nasty as they please. Compare this to the average JET, who usually gets a modicum of respect and TLC, at least to their face. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling. Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|