View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
themanymoonsofjupiter
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 Posts: 205 Location: The Big Link
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 1:09 pm Post subject: "have a try" |
|
|
excuse me for getting all teacher here, but i have been trying to explain to students that they cannot use "have a try" every time they want someone to do something. however, i have no idea how to explain how it sometimes can be used. does anyone have any definitions or examples which would make my point clearer? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nickpellatt
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 1522
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I may be wrong ... but I think that grammatically ... there is nothing wrong with that sentence. It just looks wrong to us, because it isnt a pattern of common usage with native speakers.
We would normally just say 'Ill try it' and ignore the 'have'. Grammatically, I think its fine though, its just not a common collocate for native speakers.
'Try' is normally used as a verb of course ... 'to try something', but it is also a noun, 'I will have a try at something'.
Both are correct. The former is just far more common.
Personally ... I would just suggest that whilst it is grammatically correct, it is nor commonly used in speech. Its worth students knowing that the grammar of speech and writing are different. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alter ego

Joined: 24 Mar 2009 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why not write some sample alternate sentences on the board and have the students practice them?
Teacher, have a try.
Teacher, why not have a try?
Teacher, try this/that.
Teacher, please try.
Teacher, why don't you give it a try?
Teacher, would you like to try?
Teacher, give it a try.
Teacher, why not give it a try?
Teacher, can you have a try?
Teacher, can you give it a try?
Teacher, can you try?
Teacher, you try.
Model the sentences for them and maybe they'll pick up a new way to say it. I wouldn't tell students that they "cannot" say it, because they can. Perhaps shouldn't or mustn't, but that would be getting all teacher again, wouldn't it?
If your students are involved enough to say "have a try" I wouldn't worry about it that much. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jayray
Joined: 28 Feb 2009 Posts: 373 Location: Back East
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It should be explained to the students that the expression is a colloquialism and is not used in formal speech or formal writing.
As long as they understand when it should and should not be used--- and HOW to use it--- there should be no problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
norwalkesl
Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 366 Location: Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-China
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nickpellatt wrote: |
I may be wrong ... but I think that grammatically ... there is nothing wrong with that sentence. It just looks wrong to us, because it isnt a pattern of common usage with native speakers. |
One of the things we are teaching is natural, idiomatically correct English.
In the US this would be;
"Give it a try."
"Why don't you try it this way."
"Keep trying." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nickpellatt
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 1522
|
Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The original post was asking for a reason why it was wrong. That did suggest a grammatical rule that could be given to students ... I dont think there is one cos grammatically it isnt wrong.
the structure is a simple one. A future 'will' tense. Sub+will+inf verb.
(naturally, some things may be ellipted in speech though)
I will have a try.
I will eat a cake.
He may watch the television.
They could go outside.
Whilst I agree that we should teach natural idiomatically correct English ... it is important that what may be common in spoken English, may clash with prescribed rules of language. Bear in mind, that some examples of common, and natural language usage, would provide an incorrect answer on a CET examination.
The usage of 'was/were' in a conditional statement or 'if-clause' would be an example. Whilst you may say to students that it is perfectly natural to say,
'If I was fitter, I would run a marathon' - It would be a fail on a grammar test.
In the example posted originally .. 'Have a try', there is no reason why students couldnt use it all the time. grammatically, it is 100% correct. The answer for students should be that IMO, with the additional fact that it is not the only way to say it, and others, depending upon the variety of English and location of the speaker, may be more popular or common.
I think thats what I would suggest. Those more experienced than me, and better at grammar may know otherwise though  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sinobear

Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 1269 Location: Purgatory
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tell them Master Yoda says, "Do, or do not, there is no try."
Cheers! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tommchone
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I first saw this, I was trying to think of situations where it might be incorrect, but there aren't any. It is grammatical, although it sounds a little strange to MOST native English speakers. I liken it to hearing people say "have a catch"; referring to tossing a ball back and forth. By the same token "standing ON line" has always sounded slightly odd to me, but it is perfectly correct and acceptable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Laurence
Joined: 26 Apr 2005 Posts: 401
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the correct structure is
______________
have a + [NOUN]
______________
which you can use to make
"have a go"
'go', being a noun here (as in "my go" / "your go", meaning "my turn" in a game or ordered activity). This, I think, is the phrase which students should be using when taking turns at classroom activities.
"have a walk"
"have a dance"
"have a talk"
"have a look"
"I had a long, hard think about it"
all follow the same structure, 'walk', 'dance' etc. are being used as nouns.
now, in
'try' isn't being used as a noun, it's just being used as a verb.
It follows the (IMO incorrect) structure:
_____________________
have a + [bare infinitive]
_____________________
does that sound right to you?
"have an eat"
"have a draw"
"have a bring"
"would you like to have an open?"
Outside the context of rugby,
can 'try' be used as a noun?
"this is my try, here goes"
"your try was not as good as mine"
"which try do you like the most"
"that was a good try, but you could do better next time"
"did you see my try?"
I don't think so - it sounds like colloquialism to me: Use of the verb 'try' to replace the noun 'effort'.
Quite common though.
Especially in TMD China. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
norwalkesl
Joined: 22 Oct 2009 Posts: 366 Location: Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-China
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
nickpellatt wrote: |
The original post was asking for a reason why it was wrong. That did suggest a grammatical rule that could be given to students ... I dont think there is one cos grammatically it isnt wrong. |
True, it is not grammatically incorrect.
However it simply is not said and sounds, and IS incorrect in the context of idiomatically proper American English. One of the reasons we instruct is to catch just such usages that pass grammatical muster but are idiomatically incorrect. Our ear in these situations is precisely why we are hired. They want our ear for natural language that would be correct in all other ways, but would sound odd to a native speaker.
There are more structures and sentences that are grammatically correct that are not within the set of idiomatically proper American English than are, and our job is to have our learners become aware of those structures to avoid so that they may sound as close to a natural native speaker as possible.
This structure simply is not used : have a + [bare infinitive] with try.
Grammar is not the sole arbiter of what is correct. You would be hard pressed to find a rule that prohibits this structure, but no native L1 would consider it correct. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hansen
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 737 Location: central China
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The topic of this thread is illustrates how poorly our work is understood. So what if you don't like the sound of "have a try?" Even if it is grammatically incorrect, the meaning is plain enough. The point of the communication is understood. That's what many of us are hoping for. We want to instill in our students the ability to effectively communicate.
For those "low lifes" here who are simply teaching oral English, spend some extra time, one on one, with your students. Discover just how many of them can not communicate clearly in English. They are unable to articulate their thoughts. Their pronunciation obscures their thoughts. Whatever they are saying is not understood or poorly understood.
I have plenty of students who can not make clear the difference between 13 and 30 when giving a number. That matters. Imagine their surprise when they receive only 13 for something they wanted to sell for thirty.
A big part of being an effective OE teacher is figuring out what matters. Spend your time teaching that.
Last edited by Hansen on Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tommchone
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 108
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hansen, you are absolutely correct! Will you be understood? That is what matters. In fact, I have the students practice saying 13, 14, 15, etc. immediately followed by 30, 40. Another good one is 13th, 14th, then 30th 40th, ad nauseum. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jayray
Joined: 28 Feb 2009 Posts: 373 Location: Back East
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can someone PLEASE send me a link to an authoritative source that defines "idiomatically correct"? I seem to have missed that in linguistics 101. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LoPresto
Joined: 27 Oct 2009 Posts: 87
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would if I could, but, since I'm just an "Oral English Teacher"/conversation facilitator, I have no clue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
nickpellatt
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 1522
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like threads like this ... gives us a chance to practice our own (in my case limited) knowledge ... and isnt as technical as some of the OTT grammar threads I have read.
Laurence ... 'Try' can be used as a noun outside of rugby. I checked the definition with dictionary. com and they do offer 'try' as a noun with the definition and usage as 'have a try at st'
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/try |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|