Site Search:
 
Get TEFL Certified & Start Your Adventure Today!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Students and Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Recruitment agents: the horror
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Saudi Arabia
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sheikher



Joined: 13 Jul 2009
Posts: 291

PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 3:04 pm    Post subject: Recruitment agents: the horror Reply with quote

BIRTH PAINS 101: IN ENGLISH

Much has been made of recent increased funding of higher education across the Kingdom. The most notable riyal recipient is the acclaimed spanking new KAUST campus, an architectural and high-tech marvel attracting myriad local and international students to quality instruction in co-ed lecture halls and labs.

Global glory, laud and honor continue to be lavished upon King Abdullah for his remarkable achievements, and admonishments for advancement toward world-class accreditation of this crucial, primarily public, sector. Quite frankly, it is meet and right so to do � as in all of the above: fund, reform, achieve, laud.

Are media�s songs of praise truly warranted? Yes!

Yet, higher education is witnessing the sudden proliferation of Preparatory Year Programs. Institutionalized as �pre-freshman� semesters, these serve to augment select high school curricula to assess whether students have the motivation, the abilities, to survive academic rigors inherent in longer term undergraduate endeavors.

An internationally popular website for foreign teachers of English language reveals the extent to which corruption embraces aspects of these programs within many universities Kingdom-wide, some quite prominent.

The ESL website provides anecdotal evidence of foreign teachers unwittingly, knowingly, willingly, enthusiastically implicated in contract and visa scams. Recruitment agents and campuses are named. These agents, many in collusion with outsourced overseas headhunters, offer illegal contracts and a variety of visas that prohibit salaried employment in KSA. I refer to 3-month business visit visas, tourist visas, and even visas specifying sponsorship of blue-collar workers. These same recruitment and English-course suppliers appoint on-site supervisors inexperienced in human resources, curriculum implementation, and assessment. Academic fraud abounds.

Aspirants, and successful candidates, with evident glee brazenly mock Labor laws and Interior�s Iqama regulations, thus lending credence to their sponsors� nefarious machinations to urgently fulfill contractual obligations signed by university administrators. Evidence on the website points to teachers applying under false pretenses: transcripts, health checks, and criminal records. This despite advice from �seasoned KSAers� to proceed with extreme caution or, better, cease interest and apply elsewhere.

Intermingled with concerns related to women�s safety, health insurance, accommodation quality, security, cultural norms, curriculum implementation, and dysfunctional personnel management styles, there are also inquiries regarding how best to �escape�, the availability of alcohol and drugs, and accessibility to sex, both hetero and otherwise. Then there�s the weekend escapades to Manama�s hotspots. How to avoid re-entry illegal-visa detection?

Saudi Arabia�s higher education sector currently enjoys an abundance of recruitment agents well attuned to opportunism�s whisper. Many are accustomed to managing blue-collar personnel; the results are predictable. Others express intentions to construct private on-campus colleges with their name prominently displayed at Gate 1.

A 24-page corruption report commissioned by, and submitted to, relevant authorities 18 months ago concludes: It would serve the best interests of [students] if recruitment and management of foreign teachers, and curriculum selection and implementation, were the direct, singular, responsibility of competent [university administration] personnel. Recent experience demonstrates that middlemen are using nefarious means by which to secure teachers and maintain their residency, and additionally implement curricula sometimes inappropriate to the academic needs and cultural proclivities of the students.

Recent reports in the media indicate that KSA�s education sector is to receive a considerable increase in funding as an impetus to achieve world-class education�The Gulf is generally considered to be a boon opportunity, lucrative for ESL teachers seeking alternatives from their existing overseas postings. Indeed, Saudi Arabia may well experience within the next few years a considerable influx of foreign teachers presently dissatisfied with low salaries and atrocious working conditions primarily in East Asia. Teacher recruitment agents, and their consortiums with overseas institutions, will abound. I have no doubt that many will attempt, as so many already do, to circumvent regulations to their own pecuniary advantage. I trust that the Government of Saudi Arabia seeks to engage more effective proactive measures to monitor and enforce government statutory law.


Advancement and accreditation? A matter of, quite simply, integrity.

� Saudi Gazette __

http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentID=2010102986361
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bebsi



Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 958

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of the big changes that appears to have taken place in KSA over the last few years is the propensity for hiring cheap, poorly qualified and/or inexperienced EFL teachers, whose experience is confined to teaching conversation in east Asia, and who know nothing about the needs of the Gulf student.

The motive appears to be simple: teachers who are accustomed to lousy conditions and pay elsewhere, will be more likely to accept the slightly less awful conditions imposed by unscrupulous Saudi recruiters and contractors, without a whimper. Those unscrupulous operators want compliant, not complaint! The teachers in question accept the poor pay and miseable conditions for a number of reasons:

- They know nothing about how Saudi works, and are therefore more exploitable

- Many of them are very happy to have anything that beats their previous job

- Because of poor (or no) quals and experience, some are glad to have any job in KSA

This does not mean that someone who has taught conversation in Asia couldn't make a good teacher in KSA. Of course they can; however, they need proper training and induction, just as a KSA teacher moving to Asia would. Saudi Arabia and Korea or China for example, are simply two different teaching/learning environments, where vastly different needs, methodologies, materials and cultural considerations apply.

It's all a question of appropriate deployment and training, not to mention good HR. If you hire poorly-trained teachers with inadequate or inappropriate experience, allocate them to roles inappropriately with regard to their strengths and weaknesses, and then treat them badly on top of all that, what do you get?

You get what the Saudi Gazette article was referring to, namely the fiasco that is many Saudi PYPs.

It would be wrong, however, to place all the blame on the middlemen and on their recruitment and HR practices. Within the PYP academic management structures, there are also serious flaws, which in themselves are fatal to a PYPs success. One of these, I believe is that PYP English (and other) management is all too frequently recruited on the bases of higher but utterly inappropriate academic degrees, without regard to their understanding of ELT, or their management abilities and skills. Wasta, sadly, is also a factor not to be underestimated in placing management personnel.

The effect of poor placement is academic managers who are incompetent. This would be bad enough in itself. The problem is often compounded, however, by the fact that they may be fully aware of their incompetence. To cover for this inadequacy, they resort to blame, nepotism, discrediting and bullying, to the extent that those of their more competent and experienced colleagues who recognize their incompetence, are either unjustly fired or forced to leave. Those who support them remain, and so the cycle continues.

Saudi students deserve better than that, don't they?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
007



Joined: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 2684
Location: UK/Veteran of the Magic Kingdom

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Magic Kingdom EFL hiring: Garbage in, Garbage out! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cleopatra



Joined: 28 Jun 2003
Posts: 3657
Location: Tuamago Archipelago

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Saudi students deserve better than that, don't they?


They do, but with very few exceptions, they do not demand any better. This, I think is for two reasons, which are not mutually exclusive:

1) They know no better, having, for the most part, never experienced a superior education system.

2) They're quite content with things the way they are. After all, the set-up in most unis - though boring, irrelevant and generally krappy - is easy for the students. At the end of the day, that's all the majority of them seem to care about.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bebsi



Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 958

PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's chicken and egg, really, isn't it!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scot47



Joined: 10 Jan 2003
Posts: 15343

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The decision to provide so much through the medium of English has been disastrous. Very rapid expansion of universities has also had a very bad effect. KSA does not need armies of unemployed and unemployable Graduates in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bebsi



Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 958

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

...who have been awarded degrees through the medium of English, although their standard of English as such is that of a native speaker at primary school level! Not their fault, but that of the dismal PYP standards to which they are often subjected.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trapezius



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 1670
Location: Land of Culture of Death & Destruction

PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Not their fault, but that of the dismal PYP standards to which they are often subjected.


The fault is not of the bridge between K-12 and tertiary education (i.e., the foundation year programs)... you can't expect a non-native speaker of a poor standard to learn enough English in one year to be able to do tertiary education in English, especially if s/he belong to a country with an alphabet not in Latin characters. Well, maybe a few can, but > 95% can't, no matter how great the foundation year programs are, and that's fact. So, for foundation year programs to be effective, they have to be several years long, not one year. That means that...

...the fault is that of the K-12 education system, or more appropriately, the fault is that of the different languages of instruction in the K-12 system and the tertiary system.

Only 2 ways to fix that:

1) If tertiary education has to be in English, teach English language throughout K-12, and ideally, some subjects i