| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
unplugged_boy
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 4:32 am Post subject: Selling: Canon 20D Digital SLR Camera |
|
|
Canon EOS 20D
8.2MP Digital Camera 18-55mm Lens + 2 batteries + 1gig high speed sandisk memory card + filters
This is a re-post. Haters and people not interested in buying the camera, keep your sh*t to yourself. I know what the value of this camera is and people who are looking for a high end camera like this are already quite knowledgeable without your help thank you...
The camera is the perfect SLR for advanced amateurs and professionals. Has a high 8.2MP resolution, 5 frames-per-second continuous shooting capability and a lightning-fast 0.2 second start-up time, the EOS 20D is designed to capture detail and colors, perfectly exposed images at high ISO's. The camera has a high quality feel to it. It is substantial and solid. I don't think the same could be said about it's lower end brethren and its plasticky Nikon rivals.
The camera is in superb and mint condition. Like brand new. There are LCD protectors on to prevent any scratches. It is about a year and a half old. Very fast camera and has excellent performance and fantastic for night photography. You can see for yourself. I have some non-edited shots I have personally taken with the camera in the link below.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/59558379@N00/show/
In case you are lazy and don't want to do your homework. This camera is easily going over 1,000,000 at Yongsan and Nambu Electronics Market. Danawa is listing this camera for 949,000 won REFERBISHED and my asking price is quite competitive with current ebay prices:
http://blog.danawa.com/prod/117331
http://cgi.ebay.ca/Canon-EOS-20D-Digital-SLR-Camera-Body-with-Accessories_W0QQitemZ320084816679QQihZ011QQcategoryZ107907QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I hate to see it go, but I don`t use it enough to justify having such a high end camera. The price is 800,000W and it comes with all the accessories that you need to start shooting right out of the box. I am located in Kangnam, Seoul. Email me at [email protected] .
  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AwesomeA
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Location: Yeosu
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hold the phone!!!!
I know you didn't just bag on Nikon. Canon is a good brand, I own two. But I would say that Nikon is of equal if not better quality. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gatsby
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
|
Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Canon makes great glass, with high contrast and resolution.
I have used a pro Nikon digital with an ED lens and processed photos from professional Canons, and the Nikon was surprisingly dull compared to the Canons. Heck, it was dull compared to my pocket digital cameras.
There are plenty of press photographers who have switched to Canons. I, an editor, was using the Nikon that the paper had bought because the photographer refused to use it, and bought a Canon, instead.
But there are other factors to consider when choosing a digital slr, such as speed and accuracy of focusing, and how easy it is to use the menus and controls. So it is nice to actually try using the camera first.
I never could memorize the 120 pages of instructions for the Nikon, so I left it in P. The managing editor never made it past page 1, I think, and sometimes come back with screwed up photos and strange text in the display and tried to blame me for changing the settings. So after awhile, I simply refused to use it at all, and used my own cameras.
And then there were the reporters, one of whom refused to believe the A did not stand for "auto," when it in fact stood for "aperture priority" and kept coming back with ghostlike photos exposed for two seconds or so. The other reporter seems to have dropped it, which was a pretty good idea. Don't get me started about newspapers. And publishers wonder why people aren't reading them anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
unplugged_boy
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| AwesomeA wrote: |
Hold the phone!!!!
I know you didn't just bag on Nikon. Canon is a good brand, I own two. But I would say that Nikon is of equal if not better quality. |
haha... sorry. i couldn't resist to give nikon a little shot there.
i would have to agree that both performances of a nikon D70/D80 are similar or equal to the canons. the comment was my opinion about the "feel" of the cameras. its tough to try to explain such a subjective thing like the quality. but let me put it this way the nikon's use plastic for its construction. and the canon 20D uses a rugged magnesium alloy body. this was one of the biggest deciding factors in my purchase over a nikon. for me, this sturdiness is comforting psychologically and i feel like it gives me a steadier handheld shot (yes i know..im crazy). i also look at cameras as an investment. if you also look at resale values, canons usually tend to hold onto their value a little better too comparitively with the D70 and/or D80. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinc
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:03 am Post subject: my offer |
|
|
| KW 5.5k is my offer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hepcat

Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Location: Daegu
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hepcat

Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:08 am Post subject: Re: my offer |
|
|
| martinc wrote: |
| KW 5.5k is my offer |
Good price! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
unplugged_boy
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:35 pm Post subject: Re: my offer |
|
|
| hepcat wrote: |
| martinc wrote: |
| KW 5.5k is my offer |
Good price! |
yeah.. extremely good price for only one for the parties involved...
good luck in your search for ur camera Martinc. but 5.5 will get something in canon 350d or nikon d70 range and maaaaybe a lens. so maybe you should lower your expectations kid...
and Hepcat.. thanx for your contribution.. but i already put a danawa link up to help ppl out. if you are tryin to imply my price are too high.. just say so. i don't particularly feel the need to justify my askin price with someone who isn't interested in my camera, but don't mislead others. u have to take into account that my camera comes with a lens, and accessories. some of those prices listed are just for the body.
Last edited by unplugged_boy on Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:32 am; edited 6 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AwesomeA
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Location: Yeosu
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gatsby wrote: |
But there are other factors to consider when choosing a digital slr, such as speed and accuracy of focusing, and how easy it is to use the menus and controls. So it is nice to actually try using the camera first.
I never could memorize the 120 pages of instructions for the Nikon, so I left it in P.
And then there were the reporters, one of whom refused to believe the A did not stand for "auto," when it in fact stood for "aperture priority" and kept coming back with ghostlike photos exposed for two seconds or so. |
Can't blame the camera for an incompetent photographer. Nikon, Canon, Fuji, or Pentax, you must know your camera to produce quality photo. A great photographer can produce a quality picture with a cardboard box and a magnifying glass. I can't bag on Canon, they are great cameras. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koon_taung_daeng

Joined: 28 Jan 2007 Location: south korea
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| but what about the fact that the camera is a year old? regardless of how good it is brand new its 900 at youngsan so why not 550? |
|
| Back to top |
|