| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Greekfreak

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 8 gig nano costs the same as the 30 gig ipod. I picked the latter, and though It works fine now, the crap I had to do to get it figured out in terms of getting video and mp3s converted didn't make it very appealing at first.
But it's easy to use once you get started. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shetan

Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Location: In front of my PC.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hepcat

Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Location: Daegu
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The iPod/iTunes combo is unmatched for quality and ease of use. This is why they have utterly dominated the market for so long. They aren't perfect, but are certainly better overall than the alternatives. There are very vocal nay-sayers on the 'net', like the 'ogres' on this thread. But, for every one of those yapping dogs, there are thousands of happy puppies quietly enjoying their lovely iPods.
I would get the 4 or 8 GB Nano were I you. Great sound/looks/interface, and it's solid-state (i.e. no spinning hard-drive) so it is exceptionally durable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've owned two iPods. A Mini, now a 30gb model w/video and am eyeing a Nano for gym use. They've worked fine, no complaints.
-S- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
oxfordstu

Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Location: Bangkok
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bumping this because I'm thinking of getting either a nano or an ipod. I'd rather have the ipod, because the price of the nano is such that if I spend $200 on the 4GB model, I might as well get an ipod for $50 bucks more (although aren't they a bit more here in ROK?).
But I'm wondering if an ipod is ideal for gym use? It weighs 4.8 oz compared to the tiny nano that weighs a merely 1.41 oz. I just don't know if I can justify spending that much on a nano when I can get so much more with an ipod. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chevro1et

Joined: 01 Feb 2007 Location: Busan, ROK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess it all depends on what you are really gonna do with it... I have my entire mp3 library on my 30gb ipod, so I am never in a pinch for tunes on the move. If you are gonna use it strictly at the gym, maybe the nano is for you :shrug: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mnhnhyouh

Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Location: The Middle Kingdom
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iTunes is perfect for most users, though there are a couple of traps. iTunes rips CDs to .aac by default, and there are few other players that play this format. This has the effect of locking you into apple products unless you want to rip all your CDs again.
You can set iTunes to rip to .mp3 instead of .aac, but the bundled encoder for .mp3 is old and not very good.
The other downside of using an iPod over other brands is that when iTunes puts your music on your iPod it changes the filenames to meaningless strings, put them in random folders and hides them.
You can, on another computer, find them, and copy them across, but you need another program to use the information from the tags in the song files and rename them.
Having said all that, I use a 60Gb iPod, but use alternate software on it. This lets me plug it into any computer and drag music on and off, and play it straight away.
Much credit must go to Apple for making a device that works so easily, this enabled the masses to get into portable digital music in a big way. I am looking forward to the next generation of music players. The masses have learnt a lot about using these devices and might now be ready for more sophisticated functions.
h |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AbbeFaria
Joined: 17 May 2005 Location: Gangnam
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| oxfordstu wrote: |
Bumping this because I'm thinking of getting either a nano or an ipod. I'd rather have the ipod, because the price of the nano is such that if I spend $200 on the 4GB model, I might as well get an ipod for $50 bucks more (although aren't they a bit more here in ROK?).
But I'm wondering if an ipod is ideal for gym use? It weighs 4.8 oz compared to the tiny nano that weighs a merely 1.41 oz. I just don't know if I can justify spending that much on a nano when I can get so much more with an ipod. |
I've taken my 30GB to the gym and it was ok. I don't really notice the weight but I would prefer to have a more secure clip or arm band. It hasn't fallen out yet but I also don't run on the treadmill so there's nothing high-impact. With it's moving parts, if you do plan to do a lot of high-impact work, it's not ideal. You're better to get the flash memory Nano with it's no moving parts.
-S- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
amberflannery

Joined: 25 Oct 2006
|
Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| for anyone who cares...i bought a new iriver- guess its the iriver3plus? or something. 4 click buttons around the screen- easy to use- 2 gb- movies and games too and should i ever need it built in mic for voice recording- quite happy with it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
splok
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose I'm too late to be of any help to the op, but for anyone else who might be looking, after years of ipod pseudohate, i got one of the new shuffles. its 'really' tiny. think the size of watch face, and the entire back is a clip so you can clip it onto pretty much whatever you're wearing and completely forget it's there. It's only 1g, and its controls are minimal (no screen, play/pause, on/off, track select, volume, and random toggle). Its perfect for the way I listen to music though, and I hated the bugger, clunkier player that I had before. That was probably some of the best 80k that I've spent.
The only problem is that I wish it would support multiple playlists so I could easily swap between listening to books and music. I've considered buying another just for books though heh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eamo

Joined: 08 Mar 2003 Location: Shepherd's Bush, 1964.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| splok wrote: |
I suppose I'm too late to be of any help to the op, but for anyone else who might be looking, after years of ipod pseudohate, i got one of the new shuffles. its 'really' tiny. think the size of watch face, and the entire back is a clip so you can clip it onto pretty much whatever you're wearing and completely forget it's there. It's only 1g, and its controls are minimal (no screen, play/pause, on/off, track select, volume, and random toggle). Its perfect for the way I listen to music though, and I hated the bugger, clunkier player that I had before. That was probably some of the best 80k that I've spent.
The only problem is that I wish it would support multiple playlists so I could easily swap between listening to books and music. I've considered buying another just for books though heh. |
A couple of my students have one of those tiny little Shuffles. They said it's annoying to find a song they want. No screen would be a total no-no for me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow good choice, I love that little one S10? Perfect for wearing around the neck.
| Quote: |
| But I'm wondering if an ipod is ideal for gym use? |
I find that if you plan on listening to your own music at the gym you can just get a 1GB cheapo player and put all your gung-ho tracks on it. I'm using my D2 on the threadmill and even that is an overkill. Luckily its not big and bulky like some. You only want to listen to music if it motivates you or you want to avoid hearing those same Korean songs that being played over and over again on the PA. If you want to bring a hard-disk based mp3 player then that's the risk you're going to have to take. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| splok wrote: |
The only problem is that I wish it would support multiple playlists so I could easily swap between listening to books and music. I've considered buying another just for books though heh. |
Multiple playlists on a shuffle??? how does that work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
splok
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="eamo"]
| splok wrote: |
A couple of my students have one of those tiny little Shuffles. They said it's annoying to find a song they want. No screen would be a total no-no for me. |
Oh ya, it's not something you want if you need to be able to find specific things. I like to just dump over a bunch of music and hit random though, so it's good enough for me. My only problem is when I want to listen to books on tape. You pretty much just have to listen to the book all the way through without going back to your music, unless you want alot of annoying track searching.
| rocklee wrote: |
| Multiple playlists on a shuffle??? how does that work? |
It doesn't hehe. I said I wish it did. Then it would be pretty much perfect imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rocklee
Joined: 04 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul
|
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| splok wrote: |
| rocklee wrote: |
| Multiple playlists on a shuffle??? how does that work? |
It doesn't hehe. I said I wish it did. Then it would be pretty much perfect imo. |
I know what you said, my question is how does that work? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|