Korean Job Discussion Forums

[happeningthang]

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[happeningthang]

My country right or wrong.

Your seventh point was the most salient and honest.

Why leave it to last?

[igotthisguitar]

Reality is, many "terrorists" go free.

Quite a few ( no need here of course to name names or point fingers )
even serve as HEADS OF STATE

What a wonderful world.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[igotthisguitar]

QUESTION:

Who's the bigger "terrorist": Jeff Rense or George Bush?

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[igotthisguitar]

Compared to who's the bigger terrorist.

Big Bad Rense or Big Bad Bush?

It's a pretty simple question.

[happeningthang]

I'm surprised at you Joo. You say no country wants the detained terrorist, yet the quote you give immediately beforehand makes it obvious there are at least two countries that do.

Venezuela and Cuba.

You also say that the "government" has arrested him, and wants him in jail, but that assumes the government is a single, like minded organisation instead of a collection of different agencies, like a D.A's Office, that are at time at odds with other government agencies. It's interesting that you are able to make that distinction when it comes to the judiciary.

Yes, he was arrested and tried, and released, but that's for the crime of trying to sneak his way into the country and citizenship. The fact that he's not facing charges for his terrorist activities is an interesting question in itself. Perhaps the headline of the article was misleading in that regard, but even so it's not the real question being posed. Since the US is waging a "War on Terror" why isn't this known terrorist being extradited? It seems his past as a CIA operative has complicated, an otherwise straghtforward extradition process.

And just so that you know... the rebuttals, "Other countries don't send the US their terrorists," and " "he's a retired terrorist" are just ridiculous by any measure.

The US regularly demands other countries send them their terrorists, and most countries comply. If an enemy state refuses, for whatever reason, then the men in black hop a plane, knock the alleged terrorist over the head and drag them to the US, whenever possible.

The retired terrorist argument is clearly ludicrous. Is there a statute of limitations on terrorist acts now? Imagine your son catches Bin Laden in the year 2040, a sick, dying and most importantly, retired man. Lucky old geezer Laden. He made it past his 65th birthday, and into retirement, so now he's untouchable. Most nazis are retired now too, best let the Weisenthal boys know it's tools down time.

As for the Patriot Act, I'm not an American citizen, and so am woefully ignorant of the specifics. On the face of it, I'm opposed to the erosion of civil liberties it represents, although I recognise it addresses a valid security concern. I'm not that confident that this won't result in abuses, however.

I hope that I've answered your questions fully, and I likewise hope you'll answer mine.

Are terrorist acts against states opposed to the US acceptable?

Because, your initial response seems to indicate that's your position, and that's what prompted me to comment, "My Country Right or Wrong". Nothing you've said since has made me want to rethink that assessment.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[igotthisguitar]

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[quote="happeningthang"]I'm surprised at you Joo. You say no country wants the detained terrorist, yet the quote you give immediately beforehand makes it obvious there are at least two countries that do.

[Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee]

[igotthisguitar]

No, sorry ... not a NAZI. Does that frustrate you? I hope not.
Already so much silly anger & confusion between your ears, poisoning your poor little heart.

As i explained before i'd like to BECOME an "Aryan".

How about you Joo? Would you like to become an Aryan?

Ethnic Jews are welcome!