Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ont. Voters reject faith-based education: poll
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bramble



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mindmetoo wrote:
Bramble wrote:
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.

I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone.


And it's unfair to build a bridge to PEI using federal tax dollars and not a bridge to Vancouver Island. It's an inherently unfair constitution.


Your point escapes me ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bramble



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BJWD wrote:
Bramble wrote:
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.

I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone.


So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else?


What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.

I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thepeel



Joined: 08 Aug 2004

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bramble wrote:
BJWD wrote:
Bramble wrote:
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.

I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone.


So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else?


What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.

I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system.


I agree the system has to go. But the multicultural lie bothers me. All cultures and religions aren't equal. They don't all need to be treated equally. Quite the opposite.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mindmetoo



Joined: 02 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bramble wrote:
mindmetoo wrote:
Bramble wrote:
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.

I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone.


And it's unfair to build a bridge to PEI using federal tax dollars and not a bridge to Vancouver Island. It's an inherently unfair constitution.


Your point escapes me ...


Each province to join confederation got odd riders put in. Ontario catholics demanded religious funding for their schools (remember schools at that time were religious, but Church of England). PEI argued for a bridge. Anyway, my point is the constitution says some weird things. I'd be more than happy if we changed the constitution and removed catholic funding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crusher_of_heads



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Bramble"]
BJWD wrote:
Bramble wrote:
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.

I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone.


So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else?


YOu might want to read section 23 on Education/minority rights, Einstein.

And, the notwithstanding clause.


The Catholic system is ridiculous, but to compare it tohte Mosque-their belief system is an abomination!

What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.

I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.cbc.ca/ontariovotes2007/features/features-faith.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bramble



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deleted.

Last edited by Bramble on Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bramble



Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Location: National treasures need homes

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octavius Hite wrote:
http://www.cbc.ca/ontariovotes2007/features/features-faith.html


Good article. Ontario is more backward than I thought. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
crusher_of_heads



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Messed up attributions by me-it happens to the best of us. Sorry about that.

I loathe Dalton Mcguinty and what he stands for, and I am glad I am not in Ontario-I'd be voting NDP or Liberal as there is no way I would support Tory-and I got paid for 2 years by one of the Catholic school boards in Ontario.

Not taht I am all for secularism, but giving a voice and a foot in the educational system for every monkey-arsed belief system-no thanks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I attended Catholic schools in the US during my elementary and middle school years.

Evolution is taught. Creationism is not given any attention.

There was a religion class. The trend when I was growing up was that religion was taught as a kind of historical treatment. There was comparitive attention to Buddhism and Islam in the high schools. I am not religious today, but I am grateful for my religious education. It helps to be conversant in the Bible, as anyone who has studied literature, particularly American literature, would probably agree.

Re: Tax exemption status. Catholic schools should probably be allowed tax exemption status. I know in the States parents of children who pay for private education at Catholic schools are not given abatements on their local/state taxes (a lot of which goes towards education). Nor should they be given abatements. Tax exemption should include some standards on teaching and methodology, but I'd be surprised if most Catholic schools could not meet those standards. Nobody would be hurt by holding them to those standards.

I would say those who advocate denying tax exemption status to religious schools are ignorant of the full-range of benefits such schools provide, and exaggerate a non-existant tension between religion and 'secularism' to bolster their arguments. I would not be surprised to see such people deny that literature classes or other social sciences be suppressed in public schools. It would be a natural continuation of a trend to suppress tax exemption for religious education to further advocate that public money should not go towards education that does not directly prepare students for vocational trades or money-making when they come out of school.

A balanced and liberal education should include some treatment of religion, if only in a historical context. The faiths and belief systems of the Greeks, for example, were generally not suppressed during the Renaissance. People at that time understood that while there were mention of pagan gods in classical texts, the value of studying those books outweighed any misplaced concerns that mention of such things would challenge people's belief in God. History is better taught as a living past, and insofar as schools, public or private, can convey the real beliefs of the time being studied, so much better will be the understanding of its students of the relevance and importance of the period.

Likewise, the argument that Catholicism, Islam, or what-have-you, should not enjoy tax exempt status may come from more than ignorance of the benefits of such an education. The argument may be based on an over-sensitivity to the assumed weakness of secularism. This sensitivity is not merited, as secularism can survive the tolerance of the vast predominance of religious teachings. The only religious teachings that should be suppressed are those that are violent or abhorant to a peaceful and stable open society, and I think such organizations will not only be rarely found, but will also conflict directly with the aims and goals of the greater religious community of which such organizations claim to be a part. One example of a borderline, dubious subject-matter that might fit this characterization is Creationism, which is NOT a tenet of the Catholic Church, but an invention of extremist evangelicals in the US.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Leavingkorea



Joined: 27 Apr 2007

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bravo Ontario

And for those wondering. Catholic schools are funded as they fought for and won the right, because they have been around longer than the public system as the French were present in Canada before the English. Napoleon's loss equals England's gain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International