|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Bramble wrote: |
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.
I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone. |
And it's unfair to build a bridge to PEI using federal tax dollars and not a bridge to Vancouver Island. It's an inherently unfair constitution. |
Your point escapes me ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| BJWD wrote: |
| Bramble wrote: |
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.
I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone. |
So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else? |
What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.
I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thepeel
Joined: 08 Aug 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| BJWD wrote: |
| Bramble wrote: |
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.
I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone. |
So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else? |
What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.
I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system. |
I agree the system has to go. But the multicultural lie bothers me. All cultures and religions aren't equal. They don't all need to be treated equally. Quite the opposite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bramble wrote: |
| mindmetoo wrote: |
| Bramble wrote: |
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.
I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone. |
And it's unfair to build a bridge to PEI using federal tax dollars and not a bridge to Vancouver Island. It's an inherently unfair constitution. |
Your point escapes me ... |
Each province to join confederation got odd riders put in. Ontario catholics demanded religious funding for their schools (remember schools at that time were religious, but Church of England). PEI argued for a bridge. Anyway, my point is the constitution says some weird things. I'd be more than happy if we changed the constitution and removed catholic funding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crusher_of_heads
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Bramble"]
| BJWD wrote: |
| Bramble wrote: |
Because it's unfair to fund Catholic schools and deny funding to other religious schools. Canada isn't a Catholic country, or a Christian country with two main factions (as it was at the time the constitution was drafted). Canadians hold a wide variety of religious beliefs nowadays, and many of us aren't religious at all.
I dislike the idea of segregating schools along religious lines, but if they're unwilling to change the constitution and get rid of publicly funded Catholic schools, they should at least be fair to everyone. |
So, to you, treating religions equally is more important than any problems associated with extending cash to all religions? That is, the lie is more important than anything else? |
YOu might want to read section 23 on Education/minority rights, Einstein.
And, the notwithstanding clause.
The Catholic system is ridiculous, but to compare it tohte Mosque-their belief system is an abomination!
What lie? Most Canadians don't support religious discrimination, and it's illegal according to the Charter of Rights.
I really don't think I've said anything especially new or controversial here. All I did was point out the need to get rid of an obsolete and unjust system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Octavius Hite

Joined: 28 Jan 2004 Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Deleted.
Last edited by Bramble on Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:21 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bramble

Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Location: National treasures need homes
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Octavius Hite wrote: |
| http://www.cbc.ca/ontariovotes2007/features/features-faith.html |
Good article. Ontario is more backward than I thought.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crusher_of_heads
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Location: kimbop and kimchi for kimberly!!!!
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Messed up attributions by me-it happens to the best of us. Sorry about that.
I loathe Dalton Mcguinty and what he stands for, and I am glad I am not in Ontario-I'd be voting NDP or Liberal as there is no way I would support Tory-and I got paid for 2 years by one of the Catholic school boards in Ontario.
Not taht I am all for secularism, but giving a voice and a foot in the educational system for every monkey-arsed belief system-no thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 6:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I attended Catholic schools in the US during my elementary and middle school years.
Evolution is taught. Creationism is not given any attention.
There was a religion class. The trend when I was growing up was that religion was taught as a kind of historical treatment. There was comparitive attention to Buddhism and Islam in the high schools. I am not religious today, but I am grateful for my religious education. It helps to be conversant in the Bible, as anyone who has studied literature, particularly American literature, would probably agree.
Re: Tax exemption status. Catholic schools should probably be allowed tax exemption status. I know in the States parents of children who pay for private education at Catholic schools are not given abatements on their local/state taxes (a lot of which goes towards education). Nor should they be given abatements. Tax exemption should include some standards on teaching and methodology, but I'd be surprised if most Catholic schools could not meet those standards. Nobody would be hurt by holding them to those standards.
I would say those who advocate denying tax exemption status to religious schools are ignorant of the full-range of benefits such schools provide, and exaggerate a non-existant tension between religion and 'secularism' to bolster their arguments. I would not be surprised to see such people deny that literature classes or other social sciences be suppressed in public schools. It would be a natural continuation of a trend to suppress tax exemption for religious education to further advocate that public money should not go towards education that does not directly prepare students for vocational trades or money-making when they come out of school.
A balanced and liberal education should include some treatment of religion, if only in a historical context. The faiths and belief systems of the Greeks, for example, were generally not suppressed during the Renaissance. People at that time understood that while there were mention of pagan gods in classical texts, the value of studying those books outweighed any misplaced concerns that mention of such things would challenge people's belief in God. History is better taught as a living past, and insofar as schools, public or private, can convey the real beliefs of the time being studied, so much better will be the understanding of its students of the relevance and importance of the period.
Likewise, the argument that Catholicism, Islam, or what-have-you, should not enjoy tax exempt status may come from more than ignorance of the benefits of such an education. The argument may be based on an over-sensitivity to the assumed weakness of secularism. This sensitivity is not merited, as secularism can survive the tolerance of the vast predominance of religious teachings. The only religious teachings that should be suppressed are those that are violent or abhorant to a peaceful and stable open society, and I think such organizations will not only be rarely found, but will also conflict directly with the aims and goals of the greater religious community of which such organizations claim to be a part. One example of a borderline, dubious subject-matter that might fit this characterization is Creationism, which is NOT a tenet of the Catholic Church, but an invention of extremist evangelicals in the US. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leavingkorea
Joined: 27 Apr 2007
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bravo Ontario
And for those wondering. Catholic schools are funded as they fought for and won the right, because they have been around longer than the public system as the French were present in Canada before the English. Napoleon's loss equals England's gain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|