Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why the Republicans shouldn't vote for Ron Paul!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Wrap this thread up, because its done.


Agreed.

But what are your issues with FDR? I understand that FDR, Eisenhower, and perhaps Clinton remain the twentieth century's most respected presidents -- among professional historians, at least. They left office with strong approval ratings, for one thing. (JFK did not serve long enough to include or exclude him.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Wrap this thread up, because its done.


Agreed.

But what are your issues with FDR? I understand that FDR, Eisenhower, and perhaps Clinton remain the twentieth century's most respected presidents -- among professional historians, at least. They left office with strong approval ratings, for one thing. (JFK did not serve long enough to include or exclude him.)


I love Eisenhower and Clinton both.

FDR would not be so beloved had his court-packing scheme succeeded. As it is, economists are starting to come around on Roosevelt and understand he prolonged the Depression. To be fair, the Hawley-Smoot tariff was a Congressional initiative. But FDR, we are told, used to calculate the price of the gold-to-dollar index based on lucky numbers.

FDR did wonderful in the War, and if not for the War, he would have gone down in history as a horrible President. Which he was, but for the War.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packing the Supreme Court certainly represents FDR's worst transgression against the Constitution, no doubt. The world was rather unstable after the First World War and especially post-1929 -- as British financial leadership collapsed and the Depression washed all over the world like a tsunami, doing its damage.

I am sure you already know these things. FDR's faults and shortcomings notwithstanding, I credit him for not leading us down a fascist path (and here I speak of real fascists and other, less-dangerous nationalist-populists, from Franco to Peron, worldwide).

Things could have been far worse than a president moving to pack the Court.

Kuros wrote:
FDR did wonderful in the War, and if not for the War, he would have gone down in history as a horrible President. Which he was, but for the War.


LBJ seems to have suffered the reverse of this. But for Vietnam, he would likely have been on that list. In his own sexually-colored way of describing it, he could not attend to the lady that was the Great Society because that bitch of a war kept insisting...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mithridates



Joined: 03 Mar 2003
Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kuros wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Wrap this thread up, because its done.


Agreed.

But what are your issues with FDR? I understand that FDR, Eisenhower, and perhaps Clinton remain the twentieth century's most respected presidents -- among professional historians, at least. They left office with strong approval ratings, for one thing. (JFK did not serve long enough to include or exclude him.)


I love Eisenhower and Clinton both.


At the risk of sounding like a weird comparison, one of the reasons I like both Clinton and Ron Paul is that they're both intelligent enough to not have to bother speaking from a script. With both of them you're always guaranteed to hear something new or unexpected in an interview. With most others you've pretty much heard it all if you hear them talk for a good twenty minutes or so.

Here's an editorial on Bill Clinton on the Washington Post yesterday
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Wrap this thread up, because its done.


Agreed.

But what are your issues with FDR? I understand that FDR, Eisenhower, and perhaps Clinton remain the twentieth century's most respected presidents -- among professional historians, at least. They left office with strong approval ratings, for one thing. (JFK did not serve long enough to include or exclude him.)


I love Eisenhower and Clinton both.


At the risk of sounding like a weird comparison, one of the reasons I like both Clinton and Ron Paul is that they're both intelligent enough to not have to bother speaking from a script. With both of them you're always guaranteed to hear something new or unexpected in an interview. With most others you've pretty much heard it all if you hear them talk for a good twenty minutes or so.

Here's an editorial on Bill Clinton on the Washington Post yesterday


Great article, thanks. He is certainly can be a loose cannon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tiger Beer



Joined: 07 Feb 2003

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Here's an editorial on Bill Clinton on the Washington Post yesterday

Great editorial on Bill Clinton.

Love it. Would be fascinating to have him back in the public light again. He is definetely oozing with charisma. If I were a reporter and saw both Bill and Hiliary, Bill would be the one I'd be fascinated by to interview everytime.

It's amazing Hiliary has been able to reel that in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kuros



Joined: 27 Apr 2004

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mithridates wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Gopher wrote:
Kuros wrote:
Wrap this thread up, because its done.


Agreed.

But what are your issues with FDR? I understand that FDR, Eisenhower, and perhaps Clinton remain the twentieth century's most respected presidents -- among professional historians, at least. They left office with strong approval ratings, for one thing. (JFK did not serve long enough to include or exclude him.)


I love Eisenhower and Clinton both.


At the risk of sounding like a weird comparison, one of the reasons I like both Clinton and Ron Paul is that they're both intelligent enough to not have to bother speaking from a script. With both of them you're always guaranteed to hear something new or unexpected in an interview. With most others you've pretty much heard it all if you hear them talk for a good twenty minutes or so.

Here's an editorial on Bill Clinton on the Washington Post yesterday


Ron Paul definitely has charisma. I think thats undeniable.

Robinson wrote:
The learning-curve issue for her -- and it has no precedent in American history -- would be figuring out how to deal with a husband who was very good at being president but shows little talent or motivation for being a president's spouse.


I think that's cuh-rap. What has Clinton been doing for the past 8 years? Charity, fund-raising, writing an autobiography, and more charity. Isn't that just what first ladies do?

I want people who dislike Clinton, the Republicans on the far-right, to choke on their spite for him. I was angry when the whole impeachment affair came up: it was obvious that it was totally political. So while Ron Paulites seem to be voting for Ron Paul to punish the Republicans, should I vote for Hillary (and its unlikely I will in the primaries), the threat of Billary to the O'Reilly complex would please me and accomplish the same ends. Twisted Evil

I'm a bit of an angry moderate, at this point.

Quote:
And what would happen if a new Clinton administration gutted one of the accomplishments of the old Clinton administration? One potential case in point is the North American Free Trade Agreement, which Hillary says has to be modified. If she were to keep that campaign promise, would Bill just smile sweetly on his way to the next East Room reception?


Oh, Bill would throw a fit! He'd throw a coup! He's crazy, CRAZY! [/sarcasm off]

Actually, I'm not a huge fan of Eugene Robinson.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FBI Aims For World's Largest Biometrics Database
Sat Dec 22, 1:30 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI is embarking on a $1 billion project to build the world's largest computer database of biometrics to give the U.S. government more ways to identify people at home and abroad, the Washington Post reported on Friday.



The FBI has already started compiling digital images of faces, fingerprints and palm patterns in its systems, the paper said.

In January, the agency -- which focuses on violations of federal law, espionage by foreigners and terrorist activities -- expects to award a 10-year contract to expand the amount and kinds of biometric information it receives, it said.

At an employer's request, the FBI will also retain the fingerprints of employees who have undergone criminal background checks, the paper said.

If successful, the system, called Next Generation Identification, will collect the biometric information in one place for ... identification and "forensic" purposes, the Post said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/fbi_biometrics_dc;_ylt=AtrBh57vq42XWzFpijTEGtRhr7sF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ron Paul Crosses The Christmas Candidate
Tue Dec 25, 11:09 AM ET

The Nation -- There is no debating that the most manipulative campaign advertisement of a Holiday season that in Iowa and New Hampshire offers no respite from the pleadings of politicians is that of the supremely cynical Mike Huckabee.

Appearing beneath a glowing cross and proclaiming "what really matters is the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ," the former governor of Arkansas stakes his claim as the Christmas candidate.

But Ron Paul is having none of it.

As he has throughout the campaign, the congressman from Texas is refusing to let Huckabee turn the Calvary Cross into a campaign symbol.

"It reminds me of what Sinclair Lewis once said. He says, 'when fascism comes to this country, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross.' Now I don't know whether that's a fair assessment or not, but you wonder about using a cross, like he (Huckabee) is the only Christian or implying that subtly," Paul explained in a pre-Christmas interview. "So, I don't think I would ever use anything like that."

Whether Huckabee is a standard-issue fascist or some sort of new-order theocratic fascist remains to be determined. But Paul, with his libertarian's eye for the autocratic tendencies of his Republican foes, has well reminded us that the candidate who claims Christmas bears false witness with regard to the Holiday and himself.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/45263211;_ylt=AspWgvqz_b5N_UHGOurGXINhr7sF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 10:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ron Paul will build a new coalition for liberty. The Republican Party needs to broaden its base or die. America needs to finally wake up to just how evil its laws are. The war on drugs is just one example of how America is destroying itself and how the so called liberals who support these laws are truly racist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0sLcf1jQ2QM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 5:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yah, interesting how many African Americans e.g. actually support Dr. Paul.

Of course, not that we'll ever hear this reported on CNN Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
igotthisguitar



Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)

PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International