View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Julius

Joined: 27 Jul 2006
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
We all know how stubborn koreans can be once they've committed themselves to an ill-thought out project.
joining up the two river sytems would wreck them both. Han river flows down as freshwater from the mountains, so does nakdong. They involve many tributaries that water vast agricultural areas.
If you link them up...you will basically mess up the catchment areas and introduce saltwater into the waterways of the whole country. Just so some boats can get to Busan and mr mong-back can leave a glorious legacy behind. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
oldfatfarang
Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: On the road to somewhere.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This proposal sounds like somebody has been on a package tour in Europe. Sort of a "Slowly Down the Rhine Tour". You know the ones - eating fine food and drinking fine wines - viewing castles on hilltops, while discussing art and politics with the jet set.
Trouble is, methinks the Seoul to Busan canal might be more like a, "Slowly Down the Ganges" tour. You know the story, simple wooden boats held together with superglue, powered by dark skinned indentured laborers, dead bodies floating by in murky, questionable water etc.
I'm not to sure if this canal is going to boost tourist arrivals. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiduncan
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I guess the canal-based tourism images that LMB has in his head are like this:
And some of their rather optimistic artists' renditions show us this:
However, I fear the reality of what they are planning will be more like this:
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiduncan
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't it just be better to leave it as it is?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiduncan
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a link to a before and after TV advert of the canal plans. Hope the link works
http://www.mgoon.com/view.htm?id=1223391
Translation:
Night cannot become day. No
Disease cannot be prevented. No
People cannot be birds. No
Pictures cannot move. No
Stars cannot fly (???huh?). No
The Grand Canal is a useless policy. No
2008 Korean Peninsula Grand Canal Construction.
No. That thought is the start of revolution. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds like they'll be warming up making a canal between Seoul and Incheon first. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiduncan
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've heard mention of the Seoul-Incheon canal but where did you hear the details about it?
I heard LMB plans to relax a lot of the construction restrictions around Seoul in order to boost development. Doesn't he realize the good old days of massive economic growth in Korea - like that seen here in the 1970s and 80s - are over? Korea in the last decade has had a slowing but maturing economy where people have started to realize there is more to life than economic growth.
LMB seems to want to reverse this 'well-being' trend. I've said it once and I'll say it again. He is a crusty old dinosaur who will end up embarrassing the whole country. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For my work I have to voice-record five news briefs per week. I don't know where they came from, but here's one I just recorded earlier today:
Quote: |
Government to resume Seoul-Incheon canal project
The Construction Ministry said yesterday the government will resume the construction of an inland canal between Seoul and Incheon this year. Ministry officials said they reported the canal plan to the transition committee of President-elect Lee Myung-bak.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denistron
Joined: 21 Oct 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL
Korea is a peninsula. Both cities are near or on a coast. Just boat around! What possible use could a canal have? This makes absolutely no sense. What kind of idiot could even suggest this? I hope they make it just to prove how ridiculous and wasteful it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jeffkim1972
Joined: 10 Jan 2007 Location: Mokpo
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
I joked that the only thing this canal will do is split Korea into 3. They will want independence from eachother. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently Lee Myungbag hired some experts to say the canal is a good idea.
Someone asked "But wouldn't deliveries take longer on a canal?"
And they answered "Just send your package a day earlier."
Brilliant! Why didn't I think of that? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kiwiduncan
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More on the Incheon canal. 18km in length, with construction started in 1995 and suspended in 2003, due to opposition from environmentalists and doubts about its economic benefits.
The Korean Board of Audit and Inspection concluded that the government had over-estimated the canal's benefits. I think the same will be said of LMB's new canal plans too.
In order to make the poor little ChollaDo residents that their rivals in Kyeongsang aren't getting preferential treatment LMB has plans for other stupid canal/river-fucking-up projects in the west of the country too.
This would be comparable is pointless stupidity to digging a canal from directly west of New Haven Connecticut to the Hudson river. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dalpengi

Joined: 08 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Incheon will host the 2014 Asian Games
They currently have a stadium (Munhak) built World Cup for the 2002 World Cup, which holds 50,000. Currently,it hardly ever sees more than 20,000 for K-League matches.
Holyjoe posted in ROKfootball that:
�Apparently Incheon City Hall investigated the possibility of upgrading the Munhak World Cup stadium from 50,000 to a 70,000 capacity venue for use in the 2014 Asian Games, but as it doesn't seem possible they're considering constructing a brand new 70k capacity venue elsewhere in the city specifically for use in the tournament.
Absolutely bloody nuts..�
Links to the article
http://news.media.daum.net/politics/others/200711/15/yonhap/v18863432.html
What is it about Koreans building for the sake of building? There are so many stadiums, sporting venues, bridges that serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever.
Is it a sexual thing (pouring concrete, that is)? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
twg

Joined: 02 Nov 2006 Location: Getting some fresh air...
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dalpengi wrote: |
What is it about Koreans building for the sake of building? There are so many stadiums, sporting venues, bridges that serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever.
Is it a sexual thing (pouring concrete, that is)? |
If you live within your budget in a trailer park, people will know that you're trailer trash.
If you go broke paying for that big house with a pool and garage in the suburbs, no one will know you're trailer trash until it's too late. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
denistron
Joined: 21 Oct 2006 Location: Busan
|
Posted: Fri Jan 11, 2008 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
%20(199275_f_250.jpg) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|