|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hillary gave a speech today to the effect of "I'll see you in Texas!", which implies she really has not learned her lesson and is still swingin' for the fences (going after big states and neglecting little ones). It's a completely stupid strategy in a proportional-representation election.
So. Next week Obama wins Wisconsin, big, and Hawaii, bigger. The actual delegate totals he'll get from those states are nowhere near as important as the fact that he will then have won twelve states in a row since Super Tuesday, and he'll have two weeks to let this amazing streak soak into the national consciousness. Everybody loves a winner, and by the time March 4 rolls around, TX and OH will be tied. Hillary will maybe net 20 delegates from the two of them in a best-case scenario, and will lose VT and RI big the same day to cancel that out. At that point it will be completely obvious to everyone who counts that Hillary's campaign is done, that she will go into the convention at least 150 pledged delegates behind Obama. Therefore, the unpledged delegates will jump ship en masse and Hillary will get The Phone Call telling her to give up or be publicly humiliated. She'll give up.
All IMO of course. But I think that is by far the most likely scenario. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cbclark4

Joined: 20 Aug 2006 Location: Masan
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
The eternal optimist. Do tell us why you think she'll win those states. I actually think she's more likely to win TX than OH. PA? Ha, good luck girl! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
I'm confused what you meant by this though:
| Kuros wrote: |
| Even if Obama eventually wins this thing, you're wrong simply because you called it this early. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bucheon bum wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
The eternal optimist. Do tell us why you think she'll win those states. I actually think she's more likely to win TX than OH. PA? Ha, good luck girl! |
Polls. Scroll up a bit for the OH poll.
I don't know if Hillary can win this thing, but she can definitely take OH. I think PA is within striking distance. If she wins all three (which I am NOT predicting), I'll look forward to seeing some here eat crow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mithridates wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
I'm confused what you meant by this though:
| Kuros wrote: |
| Even if Obama eventually wins this thing, you're wrong simply because you called it this early. |
|
I simply meant what I explained above. Stillnotking's prediction was that Clinton's campaign would end on March 4th. My counter-prediction is that she'll make it beyond that date. Whether or not Clinton or Obama wins is another story, but I highly doubt it will play out as Stillnotking laid it out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| mithridates wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
I'm confused what you meant by this though:
| Kuros wrote: |
| Even if Obama eventually wins this thing, you're wrong simply because you called it this early. |
|
I simply meant what I explained above. Stillnotking's prediction was that Clinton's campaign would end on March 4th. My counter-prediction is that she'll make it beyond that date. Whether or not Clinton or Obama wins is another story, but I highly doubt it will play out as Stillnotking laid it out. |
Okay. You're wrong about that though simply because you called it this early.
(Still don't know what that sentence means, no big deal though) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Obama Voters Impact McCain, Too
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/obamavotersimpactmccaintoo
I think we're seeing something of historic proportions. "...the scope and depth of his winning coalition. According to exit poll data, Obama prevailed in Virginia among while males, independents and young voters. In Maryland, he bested Clinton among rural voters, union households and catholic voters...The results also show the ways in which Obama is exerting a huge gravitational pull on both races. Obama is drawing so many moderates and independents to the Democratic race from what would normally be the ranks of the Republican electorate that 1) he's rolling up large margins and stitching together a broader coalition, and 2) he's making the Republican electorate comparatively smaller, and more conservative...Turnout, meanwhile, was up everywhere, just as it has been all along in the 2008 sweepstakes. More than 850,000 Virginians voted in that state's Democratic primary - more than twice the number that voted in the state's 2004 contest."
This may mean we're all going to have to learn the words to Streisand's version of 'Happy Days Are Here Again'.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kuros wrote: |
| mithridates wrote: |
| Kuros wrote: |
| stillnotking wrote: |
If I call it early and correctly, wouldn't that make me "prescient" rather than "wrong"?
|
I'm saying you're not calling it correctly. Hillary wins in OH and either in TX or Penn. |
I'm confused what you meant by this though:
| Kuros wrote: |
| Even if Obama eventually wins this thing, you're wrong simply because you called it this early. |
|
I simply meant what I explained above. Stillnotking's prediction was that Clinton's campaign would end on March 4th. My counter-prediction is that she'll make it beyond that date. Whether or not Clinton or Obama wins is another story, but I highly doubt it will play out as Stillnotking laid it out. |
OK, I understand what you're saying. You're saying Obama may or may not win, but whether he does or doesn't, Clinton will not drop out March 5.
We'll see. I wouldn't bet the farm on it myself, I just think it's a reasonable possibility. It all depends on how firm Clinton's support is in the March 4 states, because she's going to be belt-whipped by the media from now 'til then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stillnotking wrote: |
| It all depends on how firm Clinton's support is in the March 4 states, because she's going to be belt-whipped by the media from now 'til then. |
That may be the case, although one wonders how the media will begin to focus on Obama now that there's a reasonable presumption that he'll be the Presidential nominee. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Milwaukiedave
Joined: 02 Oct 2004 Location: Goseong
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it's a reasonable assumption neither candidate will be able to get enough delegates even on March 4th. There is a huge time lapse between then and April 22nd (about six weeks). Then again, that's what happens when most of the states decide they are going to vote in Jan and Feb.
Many in Oregon are thankful the Oregon Legislature made the choice not to follow the other states. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Milwaukiedave wrote: |
I think it's a reasonable assumption neither candidate will be able to get enough delegates even on March 4th. There is a huge time lapse between then and April 22nd (about six weeks). Then again, that's what happens when most of the states decide they are going to vote in Jan and Feb.
Many in Oregon are thankful the Oregon Legislature made the choice not to follow the other states. |
The KY Legislature just approved a new bill moving KY up to Super Tuesday for 2012.
*shakes head* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mithridates

Joined: 03 Mar 2003 Location: President's office, Korean Space Agency
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here are McCain vs. Clinton and McCain vs. Obama polls since the past year:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Head-to-head polling doesn't mean much this far out. A better predictor of the race is simply to look at the dynamics that will drive it. First thing to keep in mind is that McCain is running, essentially, on Bush's platform, which gives him most of the disadvantages of incumbency and none of the advantages.
Also, he's 71 years old. I think the McCain-Dole comparisons may turn out to be quite apt. And McCain debating Obama? That's going to be like Old Man Potter debating George Bailey.
I see very little chance of the Republicans keeping the Presidency this year. Anything's possible, and it will be a long campaign, but I'd be shocked. Unless, of course, the Democrats nominate Hillary. (It's interesting to read right-wing blogs on the Dem primaries. The general feeling is "Are they crazy? Are they really considering nominating a Clinton instead of the most dynamic, fresh-faced, motivational candidate the party has produced in at least twenty years?") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|