|
Korean Job Discussion Forums "The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 5:33 am Post subject: Idealism vs Vicious Lust for Power |
|
|
When it gets right down to it, and you set aside your �hope� for an Obama victory this fall, do you set McCain�s chances of winning at 100%, 99% or 98%?
I�m asking because the debate in the Republican camp is whether McCain is conservative enough, but there is not a whisper in either the Clinton or the Obama camp about who is the better, more pure liberal. As far as I can tell, no one is supporting either Clinton or Obama because of her/his ideas, but are supporting one because she is a woman or the other because he is black. No one seems to care what either will do for the country�and there isn�t a whit of difference between their ideas. There are even people who, in recent memory, have said a) if Clinton is nominated, I�m signing up for the Libertarian party and never voting Democratic again and b) if Clinton is nominated, I�m voting for Huckabee the theocrat.
It looks to me as if the Democrats are still in love with the idea expressed so well by Dylan: �There is no success like failure, and failure is no success at all�. It�s the noble lost cause syndrome. Yeah, the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are nice ideals and we�d like �em, but we�re not going to play politics to get �em.
My prediction: The Democrats are going to let the Republicans play the fear card�fear of Moslems, fear of blacks, fear of women. They are going to let the Republicans vote for torture and claim to be the true patriots and get away with it. Again. The Democrats are going to sit in the corner and pout while the Republicans say they believe in small government while they invade our private lives and our private decisions, all in the name of their version of Christian theology. The Republicans are going to wave the flag, thump the Bible and make empty promises they have no intention of fulfilling and the Democrats are going to gaze at their navels and ask what went wrong this time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who oversees the electronic "voting" technologies?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
In his appearance on the Colbert Report, George McGovern more-or-less characterized himself as realistic idealist.
He mentioned Jefferson and Lincoln as perhaps the two most idealistic Presidents, and he noted that one was a Democrat and one a Republican.
America's core ideals are essentially expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, and Lincoln tried his best to practically implement them.
Sometimes wars are necessary - like the Civil War and World War II - but McGovern cited the Viet Nam war and the current Iraq fiasco as unnecessary wars not justifiable in terms of American ideals.
Some draw parallels between his 1972 run as a peace candidate and Obama's current campaign. He said that rival candidates within his own party seriously hurt his chances against Nixon by "ganging up on him" in the California primary, prolonging the process, draining resources, and promoting disunity.
Although he endorsed Hillary early on as a potentially strong President, McGovern said that the more he has come to know of Obama, the more he has been impressed by his campaign.
It does appear that the Clintons and their henchmen (like Carville) will probably weaken Obama (should he prevail - which is still likely...)
Maybe Obama's best hope is that all the late-night comedians gang-up on Hillary. Colbert saw an opportunity right away and has started "implicating" her in the Eliot Spitzer prostitution ring scandal...
http://www.comedycentral.com/colbertreport/index.jhtml
(I expect that Jon Stewart will pick up on that angle tomorrow ...) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arjuna

Joined: 31 Mar 2007
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stillnotking

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Location: Oregon, USA
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:18 am Post subject: Re: Idealism vs Vicious Lust for Power |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
When it gets right down to it, and you set aside your �hope� for an Obama victory this fall, do you set McCain�s chances of winning at 100%, 99% or 98%? |
Um, what? This is the best year for a Democratic candidate since at least 1988. And yeah, I know Dukakis blew that one, but he was a terrible candidate. Obama is ten times the campaigner Dukakis was.
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
I�m asking because the debate in the Republican camp is whether McCain is conservative enough, but there is not a whisper in either the Clinton or the Obama camp about who is the better, more pure liberal. As far as I can tell, no one is supporting either Clinton or Obama because of her/his ideas, but are supporting one because she is a woman or the other because he is black. No one seems to care what either will do for the country�and there isn�t a whit of difference between their ideas. There are even people who, in recent memory, have said a) if Clinton is nominated, I�m signing up for the Libertarian party and never voting Democratic again and b) if Clinton is nominated, I�m voting for Huckabee the theocrat.
It looks to me as if the Democrats are still in love with the idea expressed so well by Dylan: �There is no success like failure, and failure is no success at all�. It�s the noble lost cause syndrome. Yeah, the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are nice ideals and we�d like �em, but we�re not going to play politics to get �em.
My prediction: The Democrats are going to let the Republicans play the fear card�fear of Moslems, fear of blacks, fear of women. They are going to let the Republicans vote for torture and claim to be the true patriots and get away with it. Again. The Democrats are going to sit in the corner and pout while the Republicans say they believe in small government while they invade our private lives and our private decisions, all in the name of their version of Christian theology. The Republicans are going to wave the flag, thump the Bible and make empty promises they have no intention of fulfilling and the Democrats are going to gaze at their navels and ask what went wrong this time. |
My support of Obama is tied explicitly to ideals. Clinton represents the worst instincts of the mainstream Democratic Party -- she voted for AUMF, voted for the Patriot Act, didn't bother to show up for the recent telecom immunity vote, etc., etc. Where you and I differ is that I'm not at all sure the Democrats like Clinton, who govern and run as Republican Lite, are doing so out of fear. That is no explanation at all for the actions of the Dem party leadership, especially in the last two years when the public has clearly been agitating for more oversight of Bush excesses. A better explanation is simply that they agree with Bush, that they think the Iraq war and the domestic surveillance state are good policies, whatever tepid objections they raise at press conferences to pacify their base.
Obama offers a hope of a new kind of Party, a Party that actually gives a damn about the Constitution, the rule of law, and a sane foreign policy. Whether he can deliver, or whether he's just another panderer, I don't know. What I do know for certain is that Clinton won't. If anything, I suspect she might abuse the office even more thoroughly than Bush has.
So, I think you are confused as to the motives of those who say they'll leave the party if it nominates Clinton. We're not bitter navel-gazers or devotees of black identity politics. We're simply on the verge of concluding that the Democratic Party has zero institutional commitment to the things that really matter to us, and that there is so little functional difference between voting for a typical Republican and voting for a typical Democrat that we might as well say "a pox on both your houses", and pursue alternative means of political activity. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:37 am Post subject: Re: Idealism vs Vicious Lust for Power |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
It looks to me as if the Democrats are still in love with the idea expressed so well by Dylan: �There is no success like failure, and failure is no success at all�. It�s the noble lost cause syndrome. Yeah, the ideals set forth in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are nice ideals and we�d like �em, but we�re not going to play politics to get �em.
|
Yes, exactly. These are the people who hate the Clintons. And, well, Republicans. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
but there is not a whisper in either the Clinton or the Obama camp about who is the better, more pure liberal. As far as I can tell, no one is supporting either Clinton or Obama because of her/his ideas, but are supporting one because she is a woman or the other because he is black. No one seems to care... |
Your thinking on Democrats' unassailable virtues and Republicans' vicious lust for power betrays an unduly reductionist understanding of American politics. It is indeed infantile.
I and others here will vote Republican this election. (Some of us voted Democrat for the last three or four elections and are voting Republican for the first time. But let us set that aside for the moment.) None of us wave the flag, thump the Bible, or blah, blah, blah. How do you account for Republicans like us in such a simplistic, slogan-like worldview?
Further, the Democrats do not play politics and are not especially playing on Idealism? How do you see Obama and his message for "hope?" His citing Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Holy Kennedy Legacy?
Getting back to those of us who used to vote Democrat but will likely vote Republican from now on, my own reason is this: I can no longer stand to hear the left's puerile, extremist discourse on heroes and villains in American politics and world affairs. Start with Michael Moore and Moveon.org. Some in the Republican camp understand adult-like realist politics. Others, of course, do not. But at least I have something in common with that one faction in the Republican Party. And this is more than I can say about any hand-wringing, obsessed-with-Republican-villains (real and imaginary), Democrats. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gopher,
The Bush administration has been a perfect example of the GOP lust for power. McCain has to distance himself from it to attract Democrats, but so far he seems to be pitching to the base. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
regicide
Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Location: United States
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
When I listen to Obama speak, I hear an educated man with the energy to do something for the American people.
After high school, Obama studied at Occidental College in Los Angeles for two years. He then transferred to Columbia University in New York, graduating in 1983 with a degree in political science.
After working at Business International Corporation (a company that provided international business information to corporate clients) and NYPIRG, Obama moved to Chicago in 1985. There, he worked as a community organizer with low-income residents in Chicago's Roseland community and the Altgeld Gardens public housing development on the city's South Side.
It was during this time that Obama, who said he "was not raised in a religious household," joined the Trinity United Church of Christ. He also visited relatives in Kenya, which included an emotional visit to the graves of his father and paternal grandfather.
Obama entered Harvard Law School in 1988. In February 1990, he was elected the first African-American editor of the Harvard Law Review. Obama graduated magna cum laude in 1991. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
McCain no doubt has a balancing act before him, if he is to win come November.
Kuros wrote: |
the GOP lust for power. |
But this kind of essentialism does not get us very far in understanding the GOP. Factions and various interest groups exist and maneuver for supremacy within the party -- just like the Democrats. The W. Bush Administration represents one collection of interests; McCain and all the candidates who fell aside in the last few months represent others. It is inaccurate to reduce all of them to such simplistic slogans as this.
Ya-ta Boy is playing "let's-use-the-Republicans-as-a-foil" game here. Democrats like the Kennedys and the Clintons, to name but two obvious examples, clearly never felt any lust for power, or went about attaining it viciously, huh? Or Democrats, like LBJ, moralistically abstain from playing fear cards during presidential elections, do they?
Ya-ta Boy's holier-than-thou position with respect to his alleged ethical and moral differences between the villainous Republicans and the noble Democrats gets old. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 8:43 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
2008:
Quote: |
None of us wave the flag, thump the Bible, or blah, blah, blah. How do you account for Republicans like us in such a simplistic, slogan-like worldview? |
2006:
Quote: |
And, in the final analysis, barring unforseen developments in Washington (military coup, etc.), in world affairs I will always side with the United States government. As we proudly say in the Marine Corps, Semper Fi; we were not chosen to protect the President in Marine One and at Camp David over Army Rangers for nothing. |
http://forums.eslcafe.com/korea/viewtopic.php?t=73350&start=15 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are keeping records of what I said here two years ago, and still brooding over it?
Ladies and gentlemen: I present to you Nowhere Man: the very face of bitter internet obsession and stalking. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Quote: |
You are keeping records of what I said here two years ago, and still brooding over it?
Ladies and gentlemen: I present to you Nowhere Man: the very face of internet obsession and stalking. |
Oh boo-hoo. I'm being stalked!
Contact a mod if you think I'm doing something wrong, you flagwaving crybaby. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gopher

Joined: 04 Jun 2005
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, the mods are rather useless on such issues. I do not need to contact them, however. You are clearly a coward with an obsession. Not a threat at all.
In any case, you have discovered a statement I made in 2006, in one conversation, that does not exactly reconcile with a statement I made in 2008, in an entirely different conversation. Congratulations for whatever it means to you. And if you are keeping track of my comments over years, then it apparently means quite a lot. C'est la vie. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nowhere Man

Joined: 08 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:47 am Post subject: ... |
|
|
Quote: |
Actually, the mods are rather useless on such issues. |
Maybe it's because your extremist portrayal of me as a stalker is more rooted in your own insecurity than fact.
Quote: |
In any case, you have discovered a statement I made in 2006, in one conversation, that does not exactly reconcile with a statement I made in 2008, in an entirely different conversation. Congratulations for whatever it means to you. And if you are keeping track of my comments over years, then it apparently means quite a lot. C'est la vie. |
Good point. You're not a flagwaver at all. It was just that one conversation.
It is unfortunate that I can remember what you've said while you can't. Work on that memory. Eliminating all the threads where you contradict yourself might drastically reduce your post count.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|