| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the corresponding Marantz reciever is the 4002 which doesn't have all the bells and whistles that the yamaha v663 has. I don't have the same amount of coin to put down as Bassexpander so won't be going for the higher end units. I know I shouldn't get blinded by the bells and whistles but the yamaha looks a bit more future proof than the Marantz. One thing I like is that it is iPod ready. I know the sound quality, even with the programming to upgrade the sound won't be that great. Its just to hold me over until I can construct media center computer with a hard drive large enough to hold all of my music using lossless codecs. Maybe I will have second look at the Marantz.
I looked up Mission and on the one site they all seemed more expensive than the wharfedales. Maybe I just need to keep on looking. So many choices it is all a little confusing. oh well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How much do you plan to spend on speakers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JongnoGuru

Joined: 25 May 2004 Location: peeing on your doorstep
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: Re: Just bought a new receiver and speakers |
|
|
tr�s tr�s retro
Attn TV-watchers: This is the Age of the iPod and speaker systems that fit in a tourist's butt bag.
My grandfather called. He wants his
back.
How big of a room you got that sitting in? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's around 12'x12' I'd say. Thought it was 10'x12', but it's a smidge bigger. My place is a typical old-style Korean villa with a small kitchen area, one larger bedroom, and one small. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Underwaterbob

Joined: 08 Jan 2005 Location: In Cognito
|
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Retro is good. I had an old wooden, 12 tonne marantz amp that cost me $30. Excellent sound through a pair of not-so-bad JVC speakers. Too bad the left channel crapped out on me. Maybe someday I'll pull it out of the attic back home and go hunting for burnt out resistors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bassexpander
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Location: Someplace you'd rather be.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I've never been a fan of Warfdale speakers. I haven't given them a good critical listening, however. The one set I heard really came across as something similiar to Pioneer-type run-of-the-mill speakers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mrsquirrel
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Somewhere in the UK I have a 5.1 setup with B&W 603's Paradigm center, wharfedale rears and a paradigm sub. All tied into a marantz amp. rear projection TV for the picture
Not sure where they all arenow though. I know with a couple of phone calls they will all come back to me.
I miss them a lot.
I had a smaller kenwood amp in my bedroom tied to some kenwood speakers and sub that was pretty nice.
My Exposure super XX amp and another set of 603's in the bedroom. a Arcam CD player.
I do miss a decent sytem to listen to music on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ulsanchris
Joined: 19 Jun 2003 Location: take a wild guess
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Most of what I have read about wharfedale has been positive. From what I can tell they have a reputation of having the sound quality of much higher priced speakers. Unfortunately down here in Ulsan they don't have any quality av shops to check stuff out. If I knew of a place in Busan I would go down there and have a listen to some speakers and see for myself. I think I won't be getting anything for a couple or more months so maybe i'll find out about a good place down there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|