Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

McClellan whacks Bush, White House
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
catman



Joined: 18 Jul 2004

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:25 pm    Post subject: McClellan whacks Bush, White House Reply with quote

FULL ARTICLE

Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan writes in a surprisingly scathing memoir to be published next week that President Bush �veered terribly off course,� was not �open and forthright on Iraq,� and took a �permanent campaign approach� to governing at the expense of candor and competence.

Among the most explosive revelations in the 341-page book, titled �What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington�s Culture of Deception� (Public Affairs, $27.95):

� McClellan charges that Bush relied on �propaganda� to sell the war.

� He says the White House press corps was too easy on the administration during the run-up to the war.

� He admits that some of his own assertions from the briefing room podium turned out to be �badly misguided.�

� The longtime Bush loyalist also suggests that two top aides held a secret West Wing meeting to get their story straight about the CIA leak case at a time when federal prosecutors were after them � and McClellan was continuing to defend them despite mounting evidence they had not given him all the facts.

� McClellan asserts that the aides � Karl Rove, the president�s senior adviser, and I. Lewis �Scooter� Libby, the vice president�s chief of staff � �had at best misled� him about their role in the disclosure of former CIA operative Valerie Plame�s identity.

� Bush was �clearly irritated, � steamed,� when McClellan informed him that chief economic adviser Larry Lindsey had told The Wall Street Journal that a possible war in Iraq could cost from $100 billion to $200 billion: ��It�s unacceptable,� Bush continued, his voice rising. �He shouldn�t be talking about that.��

� �As press secretary, I spent countless hours defending the administration from the podium in the White House briefing room. Although the things I said then were sincere, I have since come to realize that some of them were badly misguided.�

� �History appears poised to confirm what most Americans today have decided: that the decision to invade Iraq was a serious strategic blunder. No one, including me, can know with absolute certainty how the war will be viewed decades from now when we can more fully understand its impact. What I do know is that war should only be waged when necessary, and the Iraq war was not necessary.�

� McClellan describes his preparation for briefing reporters during the Plame frenzy: �I could feel the adrenaline flowing as I gave the go-ahead for Josh Deckard, one of my hard-working, underpaid press office staff, � to give the two-minute warning so the networks could prepare to switch to live coverage the moment I stepped into the briefing room.�
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Receiving much attn at CNN...

Quote:
Why air such dirty laundry in public? Because there's a market, says presidential historian Stanley I. Kutler, author of such works as "The Wars of Watergate."

Kutler notes that most of these memoirs, which he dismisses as "instant books," "fall into a variety of categories. There are the ones that say, 'I got you' or 'I'm going to get my revenge.' " Occasionally, he adds, "you get a thoughtful one."

The books also can be quite lucrative, particularly for lifetime civil servants who have never enjoyed the lavish lifestyles of Washington power brokers. Some book advances to former White House figures have been high, such as the $1 million reportedly paid to Reagan Treasury Secretary Donald Regan for his memoir and the $2.75 million allegedly shelled out for a book by ex-Clinton adviser George Stephanopoulos...


CNN Reports

Quote:
White House spokeswoman Dana Perino called McClellan's description of his time at the White House "sad."

"Scott, we now know, is disgruntled about his experience at the White House," Perino said. "For those of us who fully supported him, before, during and after he was press secretary, we are puzzled. It is sad. This is not the Scott we knew."

McClellan's former White House colleagues had harsher reactions to his book...

Former White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, McClellan's predecessor, said in a statement that "if Scott had such deep misgivings, he should not have accepted the press secretary position as a matter of principle," he said.


CNN Reports

CNN Reports
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
desultude



Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Location: Dangling my toes in the Persian Gulf

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the payback for hanging with dishonorable, untrustworthy people is having them be disloyal to you, in the end.

The memoirs coming out of this administration should at least be entertaining.

They may end up looking like a bunch of jackels fighting over the dead carcass of this administration- all trying to find one last way to cash in.

Of course, he didn't say anything we didn't already know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NPR Discussion on "White House Memoirs"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bacasper



Joined: 26 Mar 2007

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is nice to see validation of what many of us have said since the beginning.

Such disclosures come out regularly. It is incredible that so many people continue to accept the usual drivel that comes out of an administration at face value.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2008 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MSNBC Poll
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookemdanno



Joined: 30 Apr 2008

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

catman:

Meow.

Of course he "whacks" Bush because Scotty's a "whack-job."

If you want to actually get at the root of the problem and entertain another angle on this manufactured crisis, see Ari Fleischer's interview with Good Morning, America. In addition to very professional questioning from the interviewer/host, you'll get the take of McClellan's immediate boss at the White House when he first came on board.

Talk about your opportunistic publishing moves and nursing a grudge.

All the liberal press is desperately seeking explosive adjectives like "bashing" to describe what McClellan supposedly says about Bush. I wouldn't characterize it that way. He is critical at times but far more critical of the cronies: Libby, Rove, and Cheney.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nowhere Man



Joined: 08 Feb 2004

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 1:53 am    Post subject: ... Reply with quote

Quote:
All the liberal press is desperately seeking explosive adjectives like "bashing" to describe what McClellan supposedly says about Bush. I wouldn't characterize it that way. He is critical at times but far more critical of the cronies: Libby, Rove, and Cheney.


So, if he's more critical of Rove, then he's not bashing Bush?

If the book doesn't come out till next week, then how do you even know this?

This screams "Damage Control! Damage Control!"

The only reason Fleischer's commentary is "better" is because it appeals to your world view. Sound familiar?

B-I-N-G-O.

This allegation-driven discourse aside, anyone wanna step up and say he's lying?

Here's another link to ponder:

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-mcclellan30-2008may30,0,2091481.story

Yes, sooner or later, McCain is going to have to answer whether he thinks Bush spun the evidence to sell the war. That will be an interesting bit o' hopscotch when it happens.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 3:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I wouldn't characterize it that way. He is critical at times but far more critical of the cronies: Libby, Rove, and Cheney.


How would you characterize their boss?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agentX



Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Location: Jeolla province

PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2008 4:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not buying his 'conversion' but if he wants to clear the air about his role in the debacles of the Bush Admin, then more power to him.

His disclosures clearly point the finger for the Plame affair at the admin's 3 stooges; Cheney, Rove, and Libby. It seems a LOT of crap comes fro