Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

NK forces shoot SK tourist
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is the story as printed in the Chosun Ilbo:
Quote:
Quoting what North Korean authorities told tour operator Hyundai Asan, Kim said Park strayed into an off-limits military area and, instead of stopping when a North Korean soldier asked her to, fled, and the soldier fired. According to the North, Park wandered 1 km northward into the restricted area. Soldiers repeatedly asked her to stop and fired a warning shot, but she ran away.

http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200807/200807110031.html

No mention of a fence. Later in the article it says
Quote:
Hyundai Asan will withdraw the 1,263 South Korean tourists currently in the North through Sunday.
So the figure of 13,000 tourists was wrong.

[quote]Does this contradict the Norks' claim that the incident happened deep in an area that was under military control?...Or was the military zone actually on the beach, close enough to be seen by the other tourist?

Quote:


I was at the observation area just south of the DMZ about 3 weeks ago. From what I understood from my friend who almost certainly knows what he is talking about in this situation, the Norks patrol the beach as part of their military zone. ALL of the beach south of the DMZ is under South Korean military control. I visited the artillery battery that is located directly on the beach. From that, it is reasonable to believe the Norks have similar presence on the beach north of the DMZ. When I was there 10 years ago we looked through the telescopes at the observation platform and saw Nork soldiers on the beach.

I have nothing on the report of the observer except to wonder what he was doing outside at 5am.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This could be totally irrelevant and unconnected to the events at the east end of the DMZ but it is worth a look at what has been happening at the west end:

Flash of temper livens Korea talksBy Donald Kirk

SEOUL - North Korea has livened up the current round of six-party talks in Beijing with a sideshow at the truce village of Panmunjom in which North Korean guards have been kicking over tables in the one-room, one-story hootch on the line between the two Koreas, all this in the presence of South Korean tourists.

While envoys from the United States, the two Koreas, Japan, Russia and China were yakking in Beijing about "verification" of whatever the North is doing to disable its nuclear facilities, US and North Korean colonels traded rhetorical blasts at the critical flashpoint 64 kilometers north of the South Korean capital Seoul where the Korean War armistice was signed in July 1953.

First the United Nations Military Armistice Commission - the nomenclature reflects the role of the UN command structure dating from the Korean War - demanded an end to "intimidating acts" by the North Koreans. The North in turn demanded the meeting in which the senior North Korean colonel denounced the "provocative actions" of the southern side.

The North Koreans accompanied that claim with a warning that "even the slightest provocation against the other side" anywhere near the conference room "may lead to an armed conflict at any moment".

The question was whether or not the increased tensions at the Panmunjom crossing had anything to do with Friday's tragic shooting on the eastern side of the peninsula in which a North Korean soldier shot and killed a 53-year-old South Korean woman who had walked into an off-limits area during a visit to the Mount Kumkang tourist zone. The woman was said to be on an early-morning stroll near a beach when the shooting occurred.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/JG12Dg01.html

The plot possibly just thickened. To the innocently clueless ajumma possibility and the espionage possibility we can add the possibility of a Nork 'warning shot across the bow' to influence the 6 party talks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bondrock



Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Location: ^_^

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it may have been connected to 2MB's speech, in that the Norks wanted to cut him off at the knees and see if he would still give the speech. I also agree that the 6 party talks are involved.

The Norks are mainly behind the recent protests here in SK too. Amazing how they can manipulate things with their brinkmanship tactics. I admit I don't like it, but also admit that part of me shakes my head in wonder at what they are able to get away with.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The plot possibly just thickened. To the innocently clueless ajumma possibility and the espionage possibility we can add the possibility of a Nork 'warning shot across the bow' to influence the 6 party talks.


Yeah, I had thought about that as well. But then would it just be a happy coincidence that this woman wandered over the line at this particular time, thus giving the Norks the opportunity to stage their big show of force?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bondrock



Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Location: ^_^

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Those ajummas probably wander over the line every day. But this day was the day of warning because of so many reasons such as 2mb and the 6 party talks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 1:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
But then would it just be a happy coincidence that this woman wandered over the line at this particular time


IF it's a Nork plot, then they could easily have lured her over the fence before shooting her. I can think of several ways and I'm not a particularly devious person.

The more I think about it, the less coincidental it seems, but that could be the lingering after effects of reading too many regicide/bacaspar posts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 5:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Look, the ajumma was supposed to be with her group not taking a stroll by herself in North Korea. She wasn't somewhere that others were going to, so she was taking a risk. She was alone i.e. she chose to be away from the group. She didn't realize the seriousness of doing so. Is that the fault of the North Koreans? No. However, they shouldn't have shot her to death.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adventurer wrote:
Look, the ajumma was supposed to be with her group not taking a stroll by herself in North Korea. She wasn't somewhere that others were going to, so she was taking a risk. She was alone i.e. she chose to be away from the group. She didn't realize the seriousness of doing so. Is that the fault of the North Koreans? No. However, they shouldn't have shot her to death.


As far as my personal sympathy for the woman goes, I think it comes down to this...

Had she actually been made aware that the other side of the fence was a no-go zone? If I were in North Korea, and someone said to me "You are not allowed to go over that fence", then the one thing I would definitely not do is go over the fence. Even if other tourists seemed to think that it was no big deal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adventurer



Joined: 28 Jan 2006

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand wrote:
Adventurer wrote:
Look, the ajumma was supposed to be with her group not taking a stroll by herself in North Korea. She wasn't somewhere that others were going to, so she was taking a risk. She was alone i.e. she chose to be away from the group. She didn't realize the seriousness of doing so. Is that the fault of the North Koreans? No. However, they shouldn't have shot her to death.


As far as my personal sympathy for the woman goes, I think it comes down to this...

Had she actually been made aware that the other side of the fence was a no-go zone? If I were in North Korea, and someone said to me "You are not allowed to go over that fence", then the one thing I would definitely not do is go over the fence. Even if other tourists seemed to think that it was no big deal.



Well, I should be fair. We don't know all the facts. We know she wasn't with the group. But, she didn't know she was in danger, obviously.
It seems unlikely that some ajumma would just go over some fence in North Korea. What do you think? And some are saying there was no fence. It is hard to know what really happened. She didn't deserve to be shot. She was defenceless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
On the other hand



Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Location: I walk along the avenue

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 8:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to someone on the Marmot's Hole, this is the fence that the woman crossed.

As you can see, the fence isn't complete, so presumably the woman crossed over at the other end, and didn't have to jump over the actual fence. However, according to someone else on Marmot...

Quote:
Last year, a minister wandered into the same area and was detained. It appears that the fence is passable in low tide and thus not much of a deterrent against trespassers. If it happened once, it can happen again, and it did with fatal consequences. If Asan is going to bring tourists into North Korea, it ought to do everything it can to ensure their safety.



If this is true, the people on the tour REALLY should have been told in no uncertain terms not to cross the line. Personally, if I were on the tour, I think it would be pretty clear to me that the fence is a dividing line, even if it wasn't finished.

http://tinyurl.com/56k8jo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is a demilitarized zone. Not Disneyland or the zoo. And even in Disneyland and the zoo people should know not to wander over the fenceline...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Joong Ang Ilbo has a diagram with distances in its lead story. It also says:

Seoul also officially refuted Pyongyang�s account of the incident. �The North has said the victim traveled 3.3 kilometers (2 miles) in 20 minutes from the time she left the hotel and until her death,� Unification Ministry spokesman Kim Ho-nyoun said yesterday in a press briefing. �The victim was a woman in her 50s and she was moving on a sandy beach, so there is a logical contradiction in the North�s argument.�

The article goes on to say:
More signs of trouble were seen yesterday for the Lee Myung-bak administration� efforts to thaw frozen inter-Korean relations as Pyongyang used insulting language to turn down the South Korean president�s offer to engage in dialogue.

�Although the renegade talked about resumption of dialogue this time, the words are empty,� said yesterday�s Rodong Shinmun, the official newspaper of the North�s governing Workers� Party. �The speech once again revealed the anti-unification position and confrontational character of Lee Myung-bak, the traitor.�

At this point, I'm leaning to this scenario:
A woman leaves her hotel at 4:30am for a walk on the beach to watch the sunrise. Her shoes get wet from the water and it's still dark enough around 5 for her not to realize the dune marks the line of the 3.2 meter fence and she climbs over it. Wet shoes, a 3.2 meter high fence and her age argue against her climbing the fence in the dark.

She gets 200 meters past the fence before she's shot. She's inland from the beach.

The witness says he only heard 2 shots from 350 meters away. The Norks say they fired blank warning shots. No one has said anything about wind velocity or direction. The witness does say he wasn't paying attention and there was the sound of waves.

It's reasonable to ask for an investigation. Tourism has been halted. The Nork government is already losing money from one of their most important sources of income. It will be interesting how long the North is willing to give up money.

The candlelight vigil people will have a new issue to add to their list of grievances against Lee. It will be interesting to see how the non-candlelighters react to this incident. Lee has a chance to restore some of his popularity.

It will be interesting at school today. My students will know more about this than is being printed in the papers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Sun Jul 13, 2008 2:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forgot the link:

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2892280
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Bobster



Joined: 15 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two weeks have gone by, and while it probably shouldn't, what amazes me is the scarce outrage - or even sumpathy for the victim - felt or expressed by the citizenry of K Korea over this.

And the repurcussions? Little at all, aside from the cancelation of tours to Kumgansan. This is something that ought to have happened immediately when the N Koreans expelled all S Korean govt authorities several weeks prior to the incident. What was going through these people's minds, letting thousands of vacationers go on ahead and frolic inside the terrotory of a hostole power with none of their own people in place to even observe or verify or be informed of what happens to them?

With regard to S Korean poliitcs, I simply cannot see the position of the left/liberals among my Korean friends. When I asked one of them why there were no candlelight vigils for Mrs Park, the reply was "North Korea made an accident," and I couldn't keep quiet.

"First," I said, "That's not what they are saying - they want you to apologize for the fact that they killed one of you.

"Second, when an Korean soldier shoots a S Korean it's only what he was trained to do, and what he was ordered to do.

"Finally, 'accident' is what you call it when a couple of American soldiers turn a sharp corner and unintentionally plow their heavy vehicle over a couple of schoolgirls on their way to a party - but I was here in 2002 and there were only a handful of S Koreans around who called it that, and millions more who called it cold-blooded murder."

Eventually, the conversation comes around to whether and how much The Bobster loves 2MB (which is something that gives me a little deja vu when I recall how many times I was accused of loving Saddam when I first started opposing Bush's war, lo, these many years past) and I win no further points with such friends by pointing out that the Sunshine Policy was clearly a failure because there seems to be light only on this side of the DMZ.

And meanwhile, Mrs Park is quietly buried with two bullet holes in her back, her body returned only after said bullets had been removed from her flesh, because it seems that the exact make and calber and metallic composition of the weapons used by soldiers patrolling a few meters from a lucrative resort is, well, I guess it's a state secret and we have to respect that ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ontheway



Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere under the rainbow...

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Accident" is one of the words that Koreans do not understand. It has been mistranslated in the Korean/English English/Korean dictionaries. Up to 10% of the words have been mistranslated. After 911 many Koreans kept referring to the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon as "accidents."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International