View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mikowee

Joined: 03 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
a lot of special FX - but (sorry Keith) Ledger cannot hold a candle to Jack Nicholson's Joker - no way - the trailer doesn't even seem all that enticing -
will pass on this one - too bad too - Batman is my fave  |
Ledger's Joker DESTROYS Jack's Joker. I was skeptical myself before actually seeing the movie. He plays the role of the Joker the way it was meant to be played. Darker, more complex, and more psychotic than Jack's version. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Scotticus
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikowee wrote: |
Ledger's Joker DESTROYS Jack's Joker. I was skeptical myself before actually seeing the movie. He plays the role of the Joker the way it was meant to be played. Darker, more complex, and more psychotic than Jack's version. |
While I agree that the psychotic Ledger Joker is infinitely more interesting than the Nicholson one, I'd disagree that it was "meant" to be played that way. The Joker was pretty tame originally. Only after Miller and Moore got a hold of him did he get as dark and insane as what people think of as the "real" Joker nowadays. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kentucker4

Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Location: Georgia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
a lot of special FX - but (sorry Keith) Ledger cannot hold a candle to Jack Nicholson's Joker - no way - the trailer doesn't even seem all that enticing -
will pass on this one - too bad too - Batman is my fave  |
Are you crazy??? Ledger's Joker was much more sinister aqnd deeper. He was pure genius. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ds_fan
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ment to be an amzing movie- number 1 on top 250 movies, beating the godfather, that hasn't been done for about 3-4 years.
crazy |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ds_fan
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
any links for decent quality torrents of this out there? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2008 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kentucker4 wrote: |
moosehead wrote: |
a lot of special FX - but (sorry Keith) Ledger cannot hold a candle to Jack Nicholson's Joker - no way - the trailer doesn't even seem all that enticing -
will pass on this one - too bad too - Batman is my fave  |
Are you crazy??? Ledger's Joker was much more sinister aqnd deeper. He was pure genius. |
yeah, after seeing this one, I was thinking how amateurish Jack's performance seems in retrospect. I might have to watch that one again though to refresh my memory. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sapa

Joined: 05 Nov 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
ds_fan wrote: |
any links for decent quality torrents of this out there? |
only crappy cam versions out at the moment. watch it at the cinema |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
moosehead

Joined: 05 May 2007
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
kentucker4 wrote: |
moosehead wrote: |
a lot of special FX - but (sorry Keith) Ledger cannot hold a candle to Jack Nicholson's Joker - no way - the trailer doesn't even seem all that enticing -
will pass on this one - too bad too - Batman is my fave  |
Are you crazy??? Ledger's Joker was much more sinister aqnd deeper. He was pure genius. |
so where's the fun in more sinister and deeper?
maybe from being a Hitchcock fan - I like twisted and moronic w/a maniac laughter going on - Ledger looked too evil - where was the fun part? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
moosehead wrote: |
a lot of special FX - but (sorry Keith) Ledger cannot hold a candle to Jack Nicholson's Joker - no way - the trailer doesn't even seem all that enticing -
will pass on this one - too bad too - Batman is my fave  |
????????????????????????????????????????????
Batman is your fave.
This movie is being heralded as one of the best movies (not just a Batman movie) in a decade by critics across the board.
And you're going to pass because of special effects and trailers that are holding back a bit? I don't get you, bro. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can hardly notice the special effects. Nothing like the last Indiana Jones or other action movies where it is obvious what scenes are more special effects than anything else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeyboy122
Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Location: namyang
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
surfthechannel.com, right now. Quality not so good, however.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xingyiman
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DCJames wrote: |
I saw it this past week and thought it was long and boring.
just my humble opinion. |
I got burned out on Batman films long ago. Why they keep resurrecting it is beyond me since most of the Batman films of the mid to latter 90's were only marginally successful. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeyboy122
Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Location: namyang
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xingyiman wrote: |
DCJames wrote: |
I saw it this past week and thought it was long and boring.
just my humble opinion. |
I got burned out on Batman films long ago. Why they keep resurrecting it is beyond me since most of the Batman films of the mid to latter 90's were only marginally successful. |
Typical hollywood "milk it til it's dry", but to each his own. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hugekebab

Joined: 05 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scotticus wrote: |
mikowee wrote: |
Ledger's Joker DESTROYS Jack's Joker. I was skeptical myself before actually seeing the movie. He plays the role of the Joker the way it was meant to be played. Darker, more complex, and more psychotic than Jack's version. |
While I agree that the psychotic Ledger Joker is infinitely more interesting than the Nicholson one, I'd disagree that it was "meant" to be played that way. The Joker was pretty tame originally. Only after Miller and Moore got a hold of him did he get as dark and insane as what people think of as the "real" Joker nowadays. |
Lol, that's exactly the sort of thing that fat guy who owns the comic shop in the Simpsons would say. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ukon
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
|
Posted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scotticus wrote: |
mikowee wrote: |
Ledger's Joker DESTROYS Jack's Joker. I was skeptical myself before actually seeing the movie. He plays the role of the Joker the way it was meant to be played. Darker, more complex, and more psychotic than Jack's version. |
While I agree that the psychotic Ledger Joker is infinitely more interesting than the Nicholson one, I'd disagree that it was "meant" to be played that way. The Joker was pretty tame originally. Only after Miller and Moore got a hold of him did he get as dark and insane as what people think of as the "real" Joker nowadays. |
According to wikipedia, the "fun" and "goofY" joker got his start after the comic industry decided to tone it down due to pressure from the public that comics were too violent/depraved.
This joker is much more fun....instead of being a total goof, he's more so twisted and sociopathic....but still funny....Ledger's joker is the best joker I've ever seen. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|