Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

System build - your input wanted
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JustJohn



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Location: Your computer screen

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RufusW wrote:
[piggyback] How much better is the dual-core E8400 3GHz compared to the P4? Don't tell me it's twice as bloody fast!


Well I haven't looked these up, but I've heard that a 2.0ghz centrino is equivalent to a nearly 4.0ghz P4, and the Core 2 architecture is 20-30% faster clock for clock. 2x1.3=2.6 so by those numbers it would be 2.6 times as fast for normal applications, 5.2 times if you were running a program that was perfectly multithreaded. Plus, the e8400 can overclock from 3.0 to nearly 4.5ghz with the right setup. At $170 it's pretty much the steal of the decade CPU-wise.

*disclaimer: those base numbers could be way off*



P.S.
Eamo, it's even more drastic. Read my response to tfunk's post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Temporary



Joined: 13 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JustJohn wrote:
RufusW wrote:
[piggyback] How much better is the dual-core E8400 3GHz compared to the P4? Don't tell me it's twice as bloody fast!


Well I haven't looked these up, but I've heard that a 2.0ghz centrino is equivalent to a nearly 4.0ghz P4, and the Core 2 architecture is 20-30% faster clock for clock. 2x1.3=2.6 so by those numbers it would be 2.6 times as fast for normal applications, 5.2 times if you were running a program that was perfectly multithreaded. Plus, the e8400 can overclock from 3.0 to nearly 4.5ghz with the right setup. At $170 it's pretty much the steal of the decade CPU-wise.

*disclaimer: those base numbers could be way off*



P.S.
Eamo, it's even more drastic. Read my response to tfunk's post.


Well the a64 was faster the the p4 by about 10-15% and the Core2 is aboutt 20-30 faster then a64..

P4 is a slug compared to it.. My laptop butchers my desktop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JustJohn



Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Location: Your computer screen

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, well by those numbers it would only a max of 1.5 times faster. That does sound a little more reasonable I suppose. I'm tempted to look up all the specs now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kprrok



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Location: KC

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tfunk wrote:
I just picked up PC Builder magazine and these are the specs they recommend for a bang-for-buck gaming machine:

Case
Coolmaster Cosmos 1000 $200

Motherboard
NVIDIA nForce 780i $250

CPU
Intel Q9300 2.5GHz Quad $270

RAM
2GB Corsair PC85000 DDR2 $100

VIDEO CARD
NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX $300

Power Supply
Antec TruePower Quattro 850 Watt $200

CPU fan $65
Zalman 9700NT

Hard drive

Western digital 500GB SE16 SATA $90

Optical Drive
Lite-On 20X SATA DVD R/W $25

Total $1500

The power supply looks pretty pricey.


I don't know when that was written, but if it was before the HD4xxx came out, I can understand a bit. That is NOT a bang-for-buck system, more like an OC system as eamo said. That system does not even need an 850-watt PSU, it's overkill.

You could easily find a cheaper case, a P45 MOBO, switch to an HD4850, a Zalman PSU, and up it to 4GB of OCZ/Corsair PC-6400 RAM and save $4000 or so and have a much BETTER system.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Temporary



Joined: 13 Jan 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kprrok wrote:
tfunk wrote:
I just picked up PC Builder magazine and these are the specs they recommend for a bang-for-buck gaming machine:

Case
Coolmaster Cosmos 1000 $200

Motherboard
NVIDIA nForce 780i $250

CPU
Intel Q9300 2.5GHz Quad $270

RAM
2GB Corsair PC85000 DDR2 $100

VIDEO CARD
NVIDIA GeForce 9800GTX $300

Power Supply
Antec TruePower Quattro 850 Watt $200

CPU fan $65
Zalman 9700NT

Hard drive

Western digital 500GB SE16 SATA $90

Optical Drive
Lite-On 20X SATA DVD R/W $25

Total $1500

The power supply looks pretty pricey.


I don't know when that was written, but if it was before the HD4xxx came out, I can understand a bit. That is NOT a bang-for-buck system, more like an OC system as eamo said. That system does not even need an 850-watt PSU, it's overkill.

You could easily find a cheaper case, a P45 MOBO, switch to an HD4850, a Zalman PSU, and up it to 4GB of OCZ/Corsair PC-6400 RAM and save $4000 or so and have a much BETTER system.


Thats an enthusiast system.. Why would you want a Nvidia -Intel mobo they are horid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kprrok



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Location: KC

PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Temporary wrote:
Thats an enthusiast system.. Why would you want a Nvidia -Intel mobo they are horid.


What is an "Nvidia -Intel" mobo? An nVidia chipset for an Intel processor? If so, I agree agree completely. The only reason I can see going with an nVidia chipset is if you're dead-set on using an nVidia video card. Even then, unless you really want to do SLI, I'd still stay away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tfunk



Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, to be honest I don't know much about computers. The magazine says 'summer 2008', so it could have been written May/June for all I know.

The case at $200 seems ridiculous. The only way they seem to justify it is that it has levers for quick and easy access.

The magazine doesn't go into any detail about it's recommended decisions (I might have to hunt through the magazine for that).

Before I bought the magazine I based my purchasing decisions on two factors: GHz processor number and RAM number. I wasn't too sure about the whole dual/quad core thingy, the Intel/Pentium thingy.

Now I understand the principle behind the L2 cache, DDR2 RAM, spin cycle speeds for hard disks, have a basic appreciation for the dual core processor but beyond that not much..

It looks like the OP bagged a very good deal by all accounts. On a related note, is it possible/feasible to build your own laptop in Korea?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RufusW



Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Location: Busan

PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info... I'll be asking you guys for advice on my build once I reach Korea...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Technology Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International