Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

creationism in the US presidential debate. . .
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:43 pm    Post subject: creationism in the US presidential debate. . . Reply with quote

http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/elections/story/8347904p-8243554c.html

People do not get that creationism is not a theory, but a conjecture, at best an hypothesis. It does not belong in the science classroom--maybe in a debate class, but not a science classroom. It is not science.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
itaewonguy



Joined: 25 Mar 2003

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

take it up with your congressman!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this part said it the best:

Quote:

Judge John E. Jones III said Darwin's theory of evolution was imperfect. "However, the fact that a scientific theory cannot yet render an explanation on every point should not be used as a pretext to thrust an untestable alternative hypothesis grounded in religion into the science classroom."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Omkara



Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Location: USA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice selection. It cannot be tested. . . cannot make predictions. . .hence does not meet the strict definition of a theory.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Evolution is a hypothesis. It was unobservable and it is not now taking place. The evolutionist are just scared that evidence will be presented that supports creationism. How freakin closed minded can you get.
China - Don't criticize the government but you can criticize Darwin.
USA - You can criticize the government but don't you dare criticize Darwin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinitarian wrote:
Evolution is a hypothesis. It was unobservable and it is not now taking place. The evolutionist are just scared that evidence will be presented that supports creationism. How freakin closed minded can you get.
China - Don't criticize the government but you can criticize Darwin.
USA - You can criticize the government but don't you dare criticize Darwin.


What evidence?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. According to evolution fish are the first vertebrates. Where are all the fossils showing the huge transition from invertebrates to vertebrates?
2. Did everything come from nothing or is then universe eternal?
3. In terms of the "Cambrian explosion" where is the evidence of any transitional forms leading up to this?
4. What good is a bird with half a wing?
5. Describe the evolution of the eye.


More may come....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinitarian wrote:
1. According to evolution fish are the first vertebrates. Where are all the fossils showing the huge transition from invertebrates to vertebrates?
2. Did everything come from nothing or is then universe eternal?
3. In terms of the "Cambrian explosion" where is the evidence of any transitional forms leading up to this?
4. What good is a bird with half a wing?
5. Describe the evolution of the eye.


More may come....


How is any of this evidence supporting creationism?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's an either or scenario. If not evolution then creationism. If not creationism then evolution. Everything either came from nothing (or matter is eternal) or there is a Creator.

1. Fishes - Fully formed fishes. Precisely what a creationist would expect to find. Where are 1/8 backbone, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 etc etc.
2. The universe had a beginning. It is running down. Matter has not always been...it was created.
3. Basically the same as #1 - fully formed species (starfish, trilobites, etc).
4. Fully formed birds (see #1).
5. Must be fully functioning. Everything must be right from the "get-go" - no transitional time allowed (created).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinitarian wrote:
It's an either or scenario. If not evolution then creationism. If not creationism then evolution.


Pope John Paul II didn't think so:

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c017.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The topic of THIS THREAD has to do with the teaching of creationism.
I have presented evidence that supports creationism. I'm still waiting for a rebuttal of this evidence.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
OneWayTraffic



Joined: 14 Mar 2005

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinitarian wrote:
It's an either or scenario. If not evolution then creationism. If not creationism then evolution. Everything either came from nothing (or matter is eternal) or there is a Creator.

1. Fishes - Fully formed fishes. Precisely what a creationist would expect to find. Where are 1/8 backbone, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 etc etc.
2. The universe had a beginning. It is running down. Matter has not always been...it was created.
3. Basically the same as #1 - fully formed species (starfish, trilobites, etc).
4. Fully formed birds (see #1).
5. Must be fully functioning. Everything must be right from the "get-go" - no transitional time allowed (created).


These are assertions, not evidence. And a false dichotomy. Evolution and your variant of Creation are not the only options.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Assertions? Then refute them. You didn't because you couldn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trinitarian wrote:
The topic of THIS THREAD has to do with the teaching of creationism.
I have presented evidence that supports creationism. I'm still waiting for a rebuttal of this evidence.


Calm.

Since you demanded here's your rebuttal:

1: http://www.google.co.kr/search?complete=1&hl=ko&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=vo3&q=evolution+of+vertebrae&btnG=%EA%B2%80%EC%83%89&lr=&aq=f&oq=
2: This has nothing to do with evolution. For the origin of matter look elsewhere.
3: http://www.google.co.kr/search?complete=1&hl=ko&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=evidence+of+transitional+forms+leading+up+to+the+cambrian+explosion&btnG=%EA%B2%80%EC%83%89&lr=&aq=f&oq=
4: Ask a Kiwi, Penguin or Ostrich.
5: http://www.google.co.kr/search?complete=1&hl=ko&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&q=evolution+of+the+eye&btnG=%EA%B2%80%EC%83%89&lr=&aq=f&oq=

If the only proofs of creationism are holes in evolutionary theory, how would you teach creationism without first teaching evolution? What evidence is there, unrelated to evolution, that supports creationism?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Trinitarian



Joined: 15 May 2008

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I opened the first thread and it was total garbage!

You can't demonstrate your point so you throw up all these smoke screens. How moronic!

Yeah evolution is true even though there are no transitional forms from invertebrates to vertebrates. Just believe it. Why? Because evolution is true. And you people make fun of Christians for their faith!
Ah yes the incredible faith of the evolutionist. Blind chance is the alter you worship at.

Dream on pal...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Off-Topic Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 1 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International