View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ya-ta Boy wrote: |
That's not quite true. If the entire US wanted to put the question of Alaska leaving the union to a vote, that would be OK. But the citizens of a state are just a minority of the people, and do not have the right to take their neighborhood out of the union at their will. |
Well I think a referendum might mean it'd have to be majority vote. You're right, a plurality vote on a referendum to secede wouldn't fly.
And Puerto Rico? Hawaii also has a separatist movement. No big deal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
And Puerto Rico? Hawaii also has a separatist movement. No big deal. |
Sure, no big deal. But are there any vice-presidential candidates from Hawaii with connections to that movement? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Puerto Rico has every right to discuss their relationship to the US. They are not a state. There are historic legal forms to follow for them to change their status, just like all the states had.
Hawaii cannot discuss secession.
Maybe I wasn't clear above. Alaska alone cannot have a referendum on its status. The entire US would have to vote. I don't know if a simple majority or a super-majority would be needed for independence. Constitutional scholars would have to answer that.
Palin's religion is a delicate matter. I'm all for freedom of religion and she's entitled to hers, just as Romney is. Hers is a bit of a fringe religion. At the Assembly of God in my hometown, they spoke in tongues and were called 'Holy Rollers' when I was a kid. I don't know if hers is like that or not. Those kinds of religious practices are more widely spread than they used to be. I suppose the public should be aware of her religion, but I wouldn't want it to be an issue. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kuros
Joined: 27 Apr 2004
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
And Puerto Rico? Hawaii also has a separatist movement. No big deal. |
Sure, no big deal. But are there any vice-presidential candidates from Hawaii with connections to that movement? |
No. But if either of the past two Governors of Hawaii were to be subjected to your 'America First' test, they would fail. Check the link to the Hawaii Nation website. Both governors, Republican and Democrat, are quoted. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Both governors, Republican and Democrat, are quoted. |
Without seeing their quotes in a larger context, I'll take them for what they seem to be saying and say there are two more governers who aren't qualified to run for the vice presidency. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This would be the most openly pro-indpendence of the two quotes...
Quote: |
The recovery of Hawaiian self-determination is not only an issue for Hawaii, but for America. ... let all of us, Hawaiian and non-Hawaiian, work toward a common goal. Let us resolve ... to advance a plan for Hawaiian sovereignty."
- Democratic Governor Ben Cayetano |
There are a few too many ellipses in there for my tastes. I suspect that in context, the Governor was not saying quite what he appears to be saying. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ya-ta Boy
Joined: 16 Jan 2003 Location: Established in 1994
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's possible the guy was speaking of establishing the type of sovereignty that Indian tribes have. That's an entirely different thing than independence, which is what the site itself supports. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|