View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tsmith62
Joined: 06 Mar 2008
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:28 am Post subject: grammar question - present perfect and when |
|
|
Hi,
I was asked recently why in English we cannot use the present perfect tense with the word when. It's one of those cases where I instinctively know something isn't right, but I can't explain why. Does anyone know why the present perfect and "when" can't mix?
For example, we say:
"When did he see the car?"
but not
"When had he seen the car?"
Is there a grammatical explanation to this or is this a part of English that has evolved over time and doesn't have a cut and dried answer?
Many thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WillieMink
Joined: 21 May 2009
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, the second example is past perfect and not present perfect.
For example:
"I have been to Tokyo." Present Perfect
"The door had been left open." Past Perfect
Secondly, I don't that there is anything grammatically incorrect with using "when + present/past perfect".
For example:
"When he had seen that there were no more cookies, he quickly left for the cookie store." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That just avoids the OP's question. I think they meant to give a present perfect example but couldn't.
"When he had seen" OK
"When he has seen" ???
"When" would be used for an event in the past or talking about a routine. Present perfect would be used to talk about an event which did not finish yet but did start in the past. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
yawarakaijin
Joined: 08 Aug 2006
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'll believe you when you have shown me proof.
I'll believe you when you show me proof.
Getting a little sneaky in using the present perfect for an event that may take place in the FUTURE, but it is possible. While the latter does seem a little more natural the former wouldn't jump out as incorrect to me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
some waygug-in
Joined: 25 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can use it with "when" but the meaning will not refer to a past event.
I've been to Japan many times. - past event - I can talk about it now.
When I've been to Japan many times, I'll be able to talk about it.
So as other posters have said, if you add "when", it refers to something which is not yet completed and thus a future event. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WillieMink
Joined: 21 May 2009
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, I meant to give a present perfect as well.
lifeinkorea:
"When he has seen" ???
"When he has seen the mess he will surely be upset."
Yes, you could use the present as well:
"When he sees the mess he will surely be upset."
However, as has been shown by other posters, the former is also correct and has a slightly different mood/tone, as it puts an emphasis on "the mess". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
WillieMink wrote: |
"When he has seen the mess he will surely be upset." |
I don't talk like that. Instead, I would say something more like "When he SEES the mess he will surely be upset". Also, I don't "see" how there is more emphasis on "mess" than "seeing".
I wonder when common sense is used to qualify these sentences. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WillieMink
Joined: 21 May 2009
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I'm glad you have your distinct way of conversing, but one of the beautiful things about the English language is that there are many different ways of expressing the same thought.
For the purpose of this thread, I'm just showing that using "when + the present perfect" can be grammatically correct.
Sorry if it sounds funny to you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lifeinkorea
Joined: 24 Jan 2009 Location: somewhere in China
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
I'm glad you have your distinct way of conversing |
Distinct?
53,800 for "When he has seen"
1,300,000 for "When he sees"
Not only is this "distinct" use 2:1, but when you search using the perfect tense example it asks if you meant "been" (33,700).
"When he sees" is clearly used more often than those 2 combined. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WillieMink
Joined: 21 May 2009
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fa⋅ce⋅tious
�adjective
1. not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|