View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:38 pm Post subject: Charm Lee and dog eating |
|
|
No matter what he says....I am not eating fido!
The article does not mention this�but I will�Stamina? Koreans say that eating dog is good for sex?!?! Get a life! If that were true�the whole world would be eating dog! I take issue with the way Koreans torture the dogs before killing them�they claim torturing/scaring them, makes the meat tastier. I have seen this is person and I have actually been in fights with these idiots who were abusing the dogs.
Charm wants to give koreans �high-end image and sophistication.� Koreans will never ever be seen that way Charm Lee no matter how hard you try! Koreans really need to rid themselves of the reek smell of garlic and kim chee their bodies and breath give off for one thing.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/08/117_49446.html |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
okokokok
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
�So, the key here is to raise the status of the Korean culture abroad and give it a �high-end� image and sophistication. Then people won�t quibble on what you eat,� Dong-A Ilbo cited him as saying on Saturday. |
This was my favorite.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
coffeeNOW
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
�French eat horse meat. But few people criticize it. It�s because people think the French culture is a �high-end culture.� I know Koreans don�t eat dogs they raise because the dogs used for cooking are raised in dog farms.� |
What garbage. Koreans will eat any old dog that the skanky restaurant owner manages to catch or buy on the cheap. I know for a fact Lee Cham owns a number of pet Jindo dogs, yet he is advocating dog eating. What, precisely, is the difference between a pet Jindo and a poor Jindo raised on a dog farm (or unfortunate enough to be caught by a cheap-ass dog meat restauranter?) What a hypocrite. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cruisemonkey

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What constitutes food is defined by culture. I have no problem eating anything if it's killed in a 'humane' manner. I believe that to cause unnecessary suffering is wrong... but there's nothing inherently wrong in killing an animal you're going to eat.
I will shoot deer (black or whitetail), elk and moose without a qualm because I'm going to eat them. To torture an animal is wrong; as is to kill an animal for the express purpose of hanging it�s head on ones wall.
Let the arguments begin...
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hellofaniceguy

Joined: 10 Jan 2003 Location: On your computer screen!
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cruisemonkey wrote: |
What constitutes food is defined by culture. I have no problem eating anything if it's killed in a 'humane' manner. I believe that to cause unnecessary suffering is wrong... but there's nothing inherently wrong in killing an animal you're going to eat.
I will shoot deer (black or whitetail), elk and moose without a qualm because I'm going to eat them. To torture an animal is wrong; as is to kill an animal for the express purpose of hanging it�s head on ones wall.
Let the arguments begin...
 |
Humane killing or not...I am not eating fido or rin tin tin or lassie or...
too much beef available besides! And wild game! You have to be desperate to eat dog in my opinion or very very hungry. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cruisemonkey

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hellofaniceguy wrote: |
You have to be desperate to eat dog in my opinion or very very hungry. |
Naw... just a small *beep* and a belief it will help your sex life.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cruisemonkey

Joined: 04 Jul 2005 Location: Hopefully, the same place as my luggage.
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! The 'P' word is blocked by the 'swear filter'?????
'Dave's' is getting weirder and weirder.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
itaewonguy

Joined: 25 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
because Charm is trying to be e good Korean first! get the koreans on his side at the company! act korean. be korean! thats what koreans want
the Koreans are using charm but charm is to blind to realise it....
basically Charm will not nothing different than a korean will do...
well thats because Charm is a korean, and thinks like a korean... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mr tom
Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Location: ireland
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think it's unreasonable to criticise people for eating one animal rather than an other
i mean does a cow, lamb or pig deserve to be eaten, and does a dog deserve not to be eaten somehow?
is the dog or cat sacred maybe, that it should be exempt from consumption
come on people, we know you don't like to eat these animals, but what is your reason? or is it just 'the way it is' and therefore unreaonable
tom |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tfunk

Joined: 12 Aug 2006 Location: Dublin, Ireland
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
mr tom wrote: |
i think it's unreasonable to criticise people for eating one animal rather than an other
i mean does a cow, lamb or pig deserve to be eaten, and does a dog deserve not to be eaten somehow?
is the dog or cat sacred maybe, that it should be exempt from consumption
come on people, we know you don't like to eat these animals, but what is your reason? or is it just 'the way it is' and therefore unreaonable
tom |
The key word here is 'torture'. There are Korean who torture dogs before they die. Deliberately torturing cows, pigs etc. is also despicable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
CentralCali
Joined: 17 May 2007
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
cruisemonkey wrote: |
What constitutes food is defined by culture. |
And, in the case of South Korea, by law. Dog and cat are defined in law as domestic pets, not foodstuffs.
Quote: |
I have no problem eating anything if it's killed in a 'humane' manner. I believe that to cause unnecessary suffering is wrong... but there's nothing inherently wrong in killing an animal you're going to eat. |
Which brings us right back to the intentional cruelty inflicted on dogs "to increase the stamina" of the diner. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|