Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Coming back to Korea within 90 days - do I re-submit docs?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
morningsoju



Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Location: Seoul, Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:10 pm    Post subject: Coming back to Korea within 90 days - do I re-submit docs? Reply with quote

Hello,

I have a friend I'm posting for. She finished her contract a few weeks ago and so she went on vacation. She is currently traveling all over Asia and wants to return in about 2 months. She was told by a friend who 'heard' from Immigration that if she came back within 90 days, she would not have to re-submit her docs.

Has anyone else heard this? I thought that once your visa/ARC expired, then you can't renew it and would have to start the whole process over. She surrendered her ARC when she left Korea and never applied for an extension or D10 visa.

I've heard people talk about this '90 day' rule before, so I just wanted to check.

TIA!


Last edited by morningsoju on Thu Jul 04, 2013 12:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting gambler she is. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea how to get a D-10. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea how to extend her ARC. She doesn't want to ask us before leaving Korea about this 90 day urban legend. She doesn't want to ask another immigration officer before leaving Korea about this 90 day urban legend.

BUT.............

After she leaves (without the pension money by the way, how about severance?), she all of a sudden becomes concerned about re-entering Korea on a working visa which would be canceled. And to make it even more mind boggling she wants a friend to ask us, not immigration who actually makes the decisions. We only go with the wind. What they say is gospel, what we say is gossip.

Is this just a ploy to spread rumors or was this concern sincere?

1. Did she turn in her ARC? If not, not only might she have to submit new documents but she might be fined for not handing it in at the airport when leaving.

2. If her ARC has not expired, then she should be able to re-enter, no problems.

Other than that, it's a gamble.

3. KISS. Keep it simple stupid. In the future, get the D-10.

I think the rule that was being tossed around got lost in translation.

4. After you get your E2 visa, you have 90 days to enter. It doesn't mean if you already had one you have 90 more days to re-enter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^^^^ Incorrect....

IF
she intends to return and obtains a new (E2) visa/visa confirmation number within 90 days of her departure from Korea on a previous E2
PROVIDED
her previous contract has expired and she has no immigration violations in her file
Then...

a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job and probably yes for a PS position (private hire).

b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes.

c) Will she have to submit new docs to an employer/recruiter for purposes of getting a job offer = maybe.

Immigration sets the minimum requirements
BUT
An employer is allowed to ask for/demand more (as in new documents) as a condition/precondition of employment if they so desire.

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job.

b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes.


If you can do it for hagwons but not public school jobs, then can't you get a D-10? Would you then be allowed to bypass the document stage for public schools?

It seems strange that they would allow hagwons to "cheat" the system but not public schools. However, the other part in your post mentions employer. Maybe it is the public schools who want new documents, not immigration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

YTMND wrote:
Quote:
a) Will she need to submit new docs to immigration for issuance of a new visa confirmation number = no, not for a hagwon job.

b) Will she have to submit new docs for issuance of a NOA for a PS position = yes.


If you can do it for hagwons but not public school jobs, then can't you get a D-10? Would you then be allowed to bypass the document stage for public schools?

It seems strange that they would allow hagwons to "cheat" the system but not public schools. However, the other part in your post mentions employer. Maybe it is the public schools who want new documents, not immigration.


Public schools are an employer requirement and not an immigration one.
There is no "cheat".

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
YTMND



Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Location: You're the man now dog!!

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Public schools are an employer requirement and not an immigration one.
There is no "cheat".


Yes, I know that, but if a teacher has to get documents for the public schools (employer) and don't have to for a hagwon (employer), then it seems like there are less hoops to go through.

Who makes the decision to bypass this? It seems like maybe the public school and not immigration.

As teachers, we are trying to satisfy immigration rules but if what you are saying is true then maybe it would be better for this person to get a hagwon job and then quit and transfer to a public school if that is what they want.

If they did this, then they probably wouldn't need new docs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ttompatz



Joined: 05 Sep 2005
Location: Kwangju, South Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, they would.

PS jobs, as a matter of policy, require new docs from all new (E2) hires regardless of your previous visa status or length of sojourn in the country.
It is an employer requirement and not an immigration one.

They are a little less fussy on F2,4,5,6 employees provided the new hire meets the MOE requirements for registration.

And there have always been more hoops to jump through for a PS job.
I can't remember the last time a hagwon asked me (or anyone I know) for letters of reference, proof of prior experience, certificates of employment, etc.

.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
morningsoju



Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Location: Seoul, Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, she's not worried at all. She said she heard other teachers say this also. She said she went to the Immigration office and obtained copies of her Apostilled CRC and diploma, and when she came back, she would just use those. She also mentioned that since she did not go back home, she would not need new docs.

I did a search and it looks like she was misinformed or there was some miscommunication.

That's too bad for her Confused Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
morningsoju



Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Location: Seoul, Korea

PostPosted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 11:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, scratch that -- now I heard from a few other people that they knew about the 90 day rule. They said even if your visa expired, you have 90 days to sign with another school. Once you sign with the new school, they can issue you a new VIN without submitting new documents since your information is still in the database. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wildbore



Joined: 17 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Fri Jul 05, 2013 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, THE REGULATIONS say you can get a new visa issuance number without submission of new documents within 90 days. It's not a myth, there's a notice called "E-2 visa improvement notice" on the "hikorea" immigration website from back in 2011 that talks about it. The same notice that brought in the FBI checks brought in this change as well.

When I actually tried to do this myself, some old stupid immigration officer just ignored the regulation and rejected my visa issuance number anyways.

It is in the law, but there are ALOT of people who are as smart as a brick working at immigration. Don't count on it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
morningsoju



Joined: 20 Aug 2011
Location: Seoul, Korea

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WOW. Now I'm extremely confused. So this is actually the LAW, but Immigration still rejects the visa in this situation?

I don't get it Question Question Question
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Wildbore



Joined: 17 Jun 2009

PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

morningsoju wrote:
WOW. Now I'm extremely confused. So this is actually the LAW, but Immigration still rejects the visa in this situation?

I don't get it Question Question Question


Korean bureaucracy = incompetent. It was suppose to eliminate redundancy, by decreasing paperwork for those who left Korea for only a short time. All it did was create more confusion, because some officers heard about the change, and some didn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Job-related Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International