Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ferry Sinking
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 31, 32, 33  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
guavashake



Joined: 09 Nov 2013

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 1:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jvalmer wrote:

So how does refusing the escaping captain and crew to board the rescue ship, who wouldn't know what to do anyways, help?


A loaded question is a question based on a false premise or supposition, and yours is a loaded question.

In other words, you are changing my story. This is what I said...

In this particular slow motion ferry sinking, no, I would not remove the entire crew from the ship at the time they were removed, leaving the passengers unattended.

I would not give the captain and crew priority.

In addition to what was done, what was not done is significant.
As I explained, there were things that could have been done by people standing by that would have resulted in the rescue of all passengers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 3:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

guavashake wrote:
jvalmer wrote:

So how does refusing the escaping captain and crew to board the rescue ship, who wouldn't know what to do anyways, help?


A loaded question is a question based on a false premise or supposition, and yours is a loaded question.

In other words, you are changing my story. This is what I said...

In this particular slow motion ferry sinking, no, I would not remove the entire crew from the ship at the time they were removed, leaving the passengers unattended.

I would not give the captain and crew priority.

In addition to what was done, what was not done is significant.
As I explained, there were things that could have been done by people standing by that would have resulted in the rescue of all passengers.

From the pictures I've seen when the captain was taken off, the boat was already on it's side. And nobody else was around. A rescuer would not be able to easily navigate the inside of the boat in that state.

http://blog.naver.com/seojoo77?Redirect=Log&logNo=30188997378

The boat was basically fully submerged in 2 hours.

Yes, I do agree the captain and crew should not be given priority. But, it doesn't help refusing them boarding when there is nobody visibly outside at that point with the boat in that condition. And who knows what information the rescuers knew at that point. And in the photo, there is nobody around.

The rescuers aren't at fault here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
guavashake



Joined: 09 Nov 2013

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 4:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jvalmer wrote:
guavashake wrote:
jvalmer wrote:

So how does refusing the escaping captain and crew to board the rescue ship, who wouldn't know what to do anyways, help?


A loaded question is a question based on a false premise or supposition, and yours is a loaded question.

In other words, you are changing my story. This is what I said...

In this particular slow motion ferry sinking, no, I would not remove the entire crew from the ship at the time they were removed, leaving the passengers unattended.

I would not give the captain and crew priority.

In addition to what was done, what was not done is significant.
As I explained, there were things that could have been done by people standing by that would have resulted in the rescue of all passengers.

From the pictures I've seen when the captain was taken off, the boat was already on it's side. And nobody else was around. A rescuer would not be able to easily navigate the inside of the boat in that state.

http://blog.naver.com/seojoo77?Redirect=Log&logNo=30188997378

The boat was basically fully submerged in 2 hours.

Yes, I do agree the captain and crew should not be given priority. But, it doesn't help refusing them boarding when there is nobody visibly outside at that point with the boat in that condition. And who knows what information the rescuers knew at that point. And in the photo, there is nobody around.

The rescuers aren't at fault here.


Yes,

I understand if you were involved there, the results would be the same, or perhaps worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Squire



Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Location: Jeollanam-do

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

2203KST: Authorities say people are most likely in the top three levels (3rd, 4th and 5th), no mention of whether they refer to bodies or survivors. Probably both. There have been no searches on the upper two floors and the 3rd level has not been properly searched.

The idea that there might be survivors seems highly improbable to me. What have they been drinking this whole time? Sea water? I suppose there have been reports of people going many days without water but conditions must be pretty awful down there
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
young_clinton



Joined: 09 Sep 2009

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They were thinking of pumping oxygen into the ship for any possible passengers that were able to get into air pockets. I think the overall view is that anybody trapped in the ship is no longer alive. This is absolutely mind boggling, an absolute shocking loss of life. It's very difficult to believe that whoever is responsible for rescue operations could not have moved quicker, although it did happen very fast.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Squire



Joined: 26 Sep 2010
Location: Jeollanam-do

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It does seem odd, but then I don't know a thing about diving. Apparently the silt in the water meant divers couldn't see their own hands in front of their faces, but then I would have thought there must be some technology available to help divers get into the ship and have a look around.

I hate the thought that there were people in pockets of air clinging on who have since died because nobody could reach them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jvalmer



Joined: 06 Jun 2003

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

guavashake wrote:

Yes,

I understand if you were involved there, the results would be the same, or perhaps worse.

So I disagree with you and go and attack me like this. Totally uncalled for.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
I'm With You



Joined: 01 Sep 2011

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man, this is crazy.

Why can't government rescue resources respond more quickly to these disasters?

Well, if an airliner with 250 people can go missing in 2014, I guess it's not unbelievable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuthatch



Joined: 21 Feb 2008

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/20/world/asia/pilot-steering-ferry-had-no-experience-in-treacherous-waterway.html?hp


...if at a certain point, after the accident, there is no way to get people out of the sinking ship on its side (see photo as he exits)...except for divers, etc....it seems logical for the captain and crew to leave the boat...

...it also seems that people/societies look for a scapegoat...

...to err is human...I doubt the captain and the crew would want this accident and its death...there intent was not to kill...negligence is another matter entirely...

...therefore, scapegoating the crew with arrest and handcuffs seems a bit too much in a "modern democratic society"...where due process should be going on...okay...start legalities...but innocent until proven guilty...

...and really...to make a mistake is human...and to acknowledge...but this medieval blaming, arresting, suicidal honor garbage is a bit too much in the 21st century...

...the chaos and state of mind of the accident reminded me of the San Francisco airport landing accident a few months ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
metalhead



Joined: 18 May 2010
Location: Toilet

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

nuthatch wrote:


...to err is human...I doubt the captain and the crew would want this accident and its death...there intent was not to kill...negligence is another matter entirely...

...therefore, scapegoating the crew with arrest and handcuffs seems a bit too much in a "modern democratic society"...where due process should be going on...okay...start legalities...but innocent until proven guilty...

...and really...to make a mistake is human...and to acknowledge...but this medieval blaming, arresting, suicidal honor garbage is a bit too much in the 21st century...



Yeah, and I think it's become obvious now that the crew were not trained for an emergency such as this. The captain probably hopped on that rescue boat thinking that more would be on the way (people who know how to deal with such an emergency) - so yeah, definitely a problem with the system. Hopefully now ferry crews will be properly trained in how to deal with crises like this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stain



Joined: 08 Jan 2014

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be or not to be, that is the question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralCali wrote:
Got it. Yeah, plenty of people have a, shall we say, interesting concept of military life, including the judicial aspect, all thanks to what they've seen in TV shows and movies, as well as what they've read in print fiction.


Yeah, this was a fictitious, possibly 3rd world/sci-fi dictator military court image in my mind.

Quote:
The idea that there might be survivors seems highly improbable to me. What have they been drinking this whole time? Sea water? I suppose there have been reports of people going many days without water but conditions must be pretty awful down there


Yeah, at this point the best you can hope for is that miracle sole survivor, who some how manages to have a large air pocket, some water to deal with the CO2 (not sure on the science of that, but I've heard that its actually good to have some water in there) but not TOO much water so they don't freeze, and a convenient stash of water and food to stay alive. I guess with hundreds of compartments and hundreds of people you might have someone who can beat the odds...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Hokie21



Joined: 01 Mar 2011

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jvalmer wrote:
guavashake wrote:

Yes,

I understand if you were involved there, the results would be the same, or perhaps worse.

So I disagree with you and go and attack me like this. Totally uncalled for.


Don't let him get to you. If guavashake was there he would have righted the ship and saved all 476 passengers without even getting his shoes wet. Haven't you read his posts? He was on a boat once.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mayorgc



Joined: 19 Oct 2008

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To deny that elements of Korean culture played a part in this tragedy is asinine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampoong_Department_Store_collapse

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fire

In 2006, a ferry in BC sank. Of the 100+ people on board, only 2 died.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Queen_of_the_North

This doesn't mean that Korea is terrible or that Canada is awesome. But it does illustrate the differences in the way things are done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralCali



Joined: 17 May 2007

PostPosted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hokie21 wrote:
jvalmer wrote:
guavashake wrote:

Yes,

I understand if you were involved there, the results would be the same, or perhaps worse.

So I disagree with you and go and attack me like this. Totally uncalled for.


Don't let him get to you. If guavashake was there he would have righted the ship and saved all 476 passengers without even getting his shoes wet. Haven't you read his posts? He was on a boat once.


No, no. He wasn't on a boat. He stayed at a Holiday Inn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 31, 32, 33  Next
Page 10 of 33

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International