Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

South Korea: Asia's New Powerhouse Arms Exporter
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Underwaterbob



Joined: 08 Jan 2005
Location: In Cognito

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's no Avro Arrow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
RangerMcGreggor



Joined: 12 Jan 2011
Location: Somewhere in Korea

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Note that the T-50 is not just a trainer. There is a combat version (FA-50) that Korea hopes to corner the market as a super cheap fighter to replace the F-5 around the world, though it's debatable if it will succeed (Apparently, the USA is giving F-16s at inane prices that is killing that market right now).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mr_thehorse



Joined: 27 Aug 2013

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Weigookin74 wrote:
Those F 35s. Don't know what to make of those. Wish more countries could have signed onto the F 22s instead. The F 35s seem to be going down the road of a boondoggle, plus only one engine? Yikes! Anyhow, this f 18 copy is prob the best deal for the Phillipines considering the reasons they'll need it. If China attacks, it ain't going to matter what they've got in their arsenal anyhow.


Sadly, F22s are not available for export (last I heard). F35 is turning into a very costly program. Not even sure if its worth it if the Chinese stole the specs as been reported.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2014 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mr_thehorse wrote:
Weigookin74 wrote:
Those F 35s. Don't know what to make of those. Wish more countries could have signed onto the F 22s instead. The F 35s seem to be going down the road of a boondoggle, plus only one engine? Yikes! Anyhow, this f 18 copy is prob the best deal for the Phillipines considering the reasons they'll need it. If China attacks, it ain't going to matter what they've got in their arsenal anyhow.


Sadly, F22s are not available for export (last I heard). F35 is turning into a very costly program. Not even sure if its worth it if the Chinese stole the specs as been reported.


The F-35 makes the LCS program a model of sanity in comparison. Regardless, its pretty much what everyone who buys from the US is stuck with if they want a 5th generation fighter. If Dassault or the Eurofighter consortium had managed to cook up a halfway decent 5th gen alternative they could have had a real winner on their hands, but many dont want to risk being a half-step behind at 4.5. The F-35 seems to do a lot of things, none of them brilliantly. Reminds me a bit of the F-111 or B-1.

In Korea's case I suspect a big part of their decision is to 1) The need for an aircraft that can penetrate NK's Air defenses. 2)Match the Japanese who also bought it, and incidentally the Chinese. 3) Technology transfer/Reverse engineering for their KF-X programme and 4) Future joint ventures/tech transfers/ T/A-50 export assistance with Lockheed-Martin.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Weigookin74



Joined: 26 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mr_thehorse wrote:
Weigookin74 wrote:
Those F 35s. Don't know what to make of those. Wish more countries could have signed onto the F 22s instead. The F 35s seem to be going down the road of a boondoggle, plus only one engine? Yikes! Anyhow, this f 18 copy is prob the best deal for the Phillipines considering the reasons they'll need it. If China attacks, it ain't going to matter what they've got in their arsenal anyhow.


Sadly, F22s are not available for export (last I heard). F35 is turning into a very costly program. Not even sure if its worth it if the Chinese stole the specs as been reported.


Yeah, I know. That's why I said I wished.... Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Weigookin74



Joined: 26 Oct 2009

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2014 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Weigookin74 wrote:
mr_thehorse wrote:
Weigookin74 wrote:
Those F 35s. Don't know what to make of those. Wish more countries could have signed onto the F 22s instead. The F 35s seem to be going down the road of a boondoggle, plus only one engine? Yikes! Anyhow, this f 18 copy is prob the best deal for the Phillipines considering the reasons they'll need it. If China attacks, it ain't going to matter what they've got in their arsenal anyhow.


Sadly, F22s are not available for export (last I heard). F35 is turning into a very costly program. Not even sure if its worth it if the Chinese stole the specs as been reported.


Yeah, I know. That's why I said I wished.... Smile


You think the US government would keep their military technology offline away from hacking and don't allow anyone who even remotely looks Chinese into the facilites due to the real theft that has occured in the past. Some might cry racism, but do you think a Chinese General is going to let a white guy walk into a Chinese military base? Hㅌ!! no!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrewchon



Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What F-16? It doesn't look much like an F-16. Confused

Anyway, it's revolutionary feature is the bailout system. The rear seated teacher will leave first, and then the front seated student will get the comforting female computer voice telling him/her: "Please Remain Seated". The teacher-pilot, if he/she survives the para-drop then gets charged with homicide and negligence. Laughing

Revolutionary feature 2: When the system is turned on, it plays "Oppan Gangnam Style" and at the push of button the plane can do the 'horse-riding dance' while taxing in.

Note: Psy's Gangnam Style is near 2 billion hits. 1,997 million at present. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stan Rogers



Joined: 20 Aug 2010

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 3:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The future is in drones.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Steelrails



Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Location: Earth, Solar System

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

andrewchon wrote:
What F-16? It doesn't look much like an F-16. Confused

Anyway, it's revolutionary feature is the bailout system. The rear seated teacher will leave first, and then the front seated student will get the comforting female computer voice telling him/her: "Please Remain Seated". The teacher-pilot, if he/she survives the para-drop then gets charged with homicide and negligence. Laughing

Revolutionary feature 2: When the system is turned on, it plays "Oppan Gangnam Style" and at the push of button the plane can do the 'horse-riding dance' while taxing in.

Note: Psy's Gangnam Style is near 2 billion hits. 1,997 million at present. Laughing


In spite of the peanut gallery's comments, ROKAF pilots are not a bunch of asshats. Several of my adult students are ROKAF fighter pilots. One of them a few months ago actually told a riveting story about an incident involving his aircraft. He's an instructor and during landing the aircraft suffered a mechanical. He was able to successfully bring the aircraft to a stop in such a manner as to prevent it from being written off. What was amazing to him was how little he actually remembered (adrenalin), but according to both video and cockpit recorder, he found out what happened.

As the instructor, the second the landing gear failed, he immediately executed a takeover of the plane's controls over the student, and the student relinquished control, as they had been trained to do. He attempted to bring the aircraft under control and at one point, as the instructor and person in control, had to consider ejecting them from the aircraft, but deemed it risky and advisable to continue to control the plane. He decided against this and the plane successfully came to a stop. Training took over and led to a successful outcome, given the situation.

Also, funny thing about Korean fighter pilots (and who knows, probably many fighter pilots around the world), you'd never know they were fighter pilots if you looked at them. Low-key guys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrewchon



Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Location: Back in Oz. Living in ISIS Aust.

PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stan Rogers wrote:
The future is in drones.


If the drones can dance 'Gangnam Style' maybe, otherwise flying flash-mob wins! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> General Discussion Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International