View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 10:02 am Post subject: Taxes to double next year? |
|
|
Asking because another foreigner said his accountant said this will happen next year. Of course, it's just a rumor at this point. Hope it's not true. If I wanted to pay Canadian style taxes and have a more expensive cost of living, I'd live in Canada where things actually make sense. Up till now, the lower taxation and cheaper living cost made this country worth the other BS you have to endure. Anyways, hope it's just a farce. Just posting to see if the rest of you have heard this at all? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, it's hard to find things online in English. So far, this is all I could find. It does seem we pay a bit more than before.
http://www.korea4expats.com/article-income-taxes.html
(We use to get a 30% deduction and haven't for a while. Though I had heard this.) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stan Rogers
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2015 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It wouldn't surprise me. Taxes have been slowly rising over the past few years and many deductions eliminated. ETs don't see it as much as people in higher tax brackets but the trend is certainly there. Ask a person legally making 70 million won a year how things have changed over the last few years. They will tell you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bongotruck
Joined: 19 Mar 2015
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only benefit I can see from tax here seems to be shoveling money to the few people who are still having kids. I seriously wonder where Korea's tax revenue is going.
On a lighter note, I got back all of the tax deducted from my cheques last year save the residence tax. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stan Rogers wrote: |
It wouldn't surprise me. Taxes have been slowly rising over the past few years and many deductions eliminated. ETs don't see it as much as people in higher tax brackets but the trend is certainly there. Ask a person legally making 70 million won a year how things have changed over the last few years. They will tell you. |
Ah, no wonder the Korean economy is suffering then. More taxes lead to slowed growth. Korea will probably follow the Japan economic model then? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Coltronator
Joined: 04 Dec 2013
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah got no problem with this. My Taxes (& Tax like payroll deductions for Health and Pension) amount to 9% per year. Only 4% or so is actual tax. If my taxes for someone making 40k a year go up to 8% I congratulate Korea on their sensible and responsible solution to their budget problems so taht they can continue to provide Free lunches to all Elementary school students & 90% subsidized Daycare until age 8 and a national health program that covers 50% and regulations that keep costs to 10% of America's (For a total of 5% the cost of U.S.)
It was either that or get rid of either the Lunches or Daycare and then which ever party pushed for that would face hell come election time. This not only the best thing to be proposed but also the one people would gripe about the least.
Add in that someone in the 40-60k bracket actually only has a 50% Tax increase (so 4% to 6%). Lower is affected even less (or not at all in some proposals) and well it gets my blessing for being one of the most progressive actions by an OECD nation in the last 5 years. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Coltronator wrote: |
provide Free lunches to all Elementary school students |
Like to point out this is only true in some jurisdictions. Mainly Seoul/Gyeonggi. The students in my province have to pay something like 3100 a meal. I do believe lower income families do get discouts on it.
I too don't have a problem with rising taxes. I just hope one day a really brave major economy will start some kind of unconditional basic income progam. Kind of like the one the Swiss were talking about. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Coltronator
Joined: 04 Dec 2013
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most jurisdictions. Gyeongsam Buk/Nam, Gyeonggi, Seoul, Busan, Ulsan, Daegu.
The only ones who don't are a few DUP controlled MOEs (not all because it makes parents angry and they don't want bad press or think it isn;t a giid idea) make their own choices on how to meet their budget shortfalls. So they eliminate it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Coltronator wrote: |
Most jurisdictions. Gyeongsam Buk/Nam, Gyeonggi, Seoul, Busan, Ulsan, Daegu.
The only ones who don't are a few DUP controlled MOEs (not all because it makes parents angry and they don't want bad press or think it isn;t a giid idea) make their own choices on how to meet their budget shortfalls. So they eliminate it. |
You are wrong on Gyeongsangbuk, and Gyeongnam only provides it to poor students. Not sure about Daegu, Busan and Ulsan, but I suspect it's not free for all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Coltronator wrote: |
Yeah got no problem with this. My Taxes (& Tax like payroll deductions for Health and Pension) amount to 9% per year. Only 4% or so is actual tax. If my taxes for someone making 40k a year go up to 8% I congratulate Korea on their sensible and responsible solution to their budget problems so taht they can continue to provide Free lunches to all Elementary school students & 90% subsidized Daycare until age 8 and a national health program that covers 50% and regulations that keep costs to 10% of America's (For a total of 5% the cost of U.S.)
It was either that or get rid of either the Lunches or Daycare and then which ever party pushed for that would face hell come election time. This not only the best thing to be proposed but also the one people would gripe about the least.
Add in that someone in the 40-60k bracket actually only has a 50% Tax increase (so 4% to 6%). Lower is affected even less (or not at all in some proposals) and well it gets my blessing for being one of the most progressive actions by an OECD nation in the last 5 years. |
Either way the economy is slowing here for a reason and tax hikes are not the best for it. Do governments need to provide school lunches for everyone who isn't poor? Also, I'm sure with more tax hikes they will waste it on other things. Ever hear of the four rivers project? There's a reason why Canada is such a high price high cost of living rip off. Shame as cheap living costs were nice here. In Canada, you really have to be a high income professional to have a high quality of life due to everything being so damn expensive. At least here with things being cheaper even poorer people have it somewhat easier. As for health, we already pay the health tax.
Either way, every country that has gone through high taxes has had high unemployment. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2015 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
6%, 15%, 24%, 35%, 38%
It maxes out at around 40%.
Most of us will be in that 6% to 15% bracket of the amount we earn above 10-ish million won. Hardly that high. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Stan Rogers
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Weigookin74.[/quote]
Do governments need to provide school lunches for everyone who isn't poor? [/quote]
I say everyone should get the free stuff or nobody should get it. Tax payers should be first on the list to get 'free' stuff because they are paying for it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Weigookin74
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stan Rogers wrote: |
[quote="Weigookin74. |
Do governments need to provide school lunches for everyone who isn't poor? [/quote]
I say everyone should get the free stuff or nobody should get it. Tax payers should be first on the list to get 'free' stuff because they are paying for it.[/quote]
That makes no sense. But if everyone gets it, they will definitely pay for it and pay much much more in the years to come. These things along with the four rivers projects and others will put up taxes a lot. No one is talking about not helping the poor, but there is such a thing as smart and efficient management of money. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wooden nickels
Joined: 23 May 2010
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
There's no such thing as a free lunch. Someone has to pay for it. Example: me, the tax payer. If you can't afford to feed your kids, don't have them. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jvalmer

Joined: 06 Jun 2003
|
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2015 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Weigookin74 wrote: |
These things along with the four rivers projects and others will put up taxes a lot. |
You do realize the Four Rivers Project is over, done, dead? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|