View previous topic :: View next topic |
Do mommys and daddys have a positive impact on learning? |
Yes the Hogwan and unsegregated classes mean the kids do better |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
No the kids would be far better off in a decent schooling system and going to bed at a reasonable hour |
|
100% |
[ 38 ] |
Its not perfect but its the best that can be done at present |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 38 |
|
Author |
Message |
blunder1983
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2005 4:52 pm Post subject: Do Ajummas impact negatively on kids education? |
|
|
I saw in one of CLGs posts that they dont grade classes on ability. I thought this surely happened in High School (like it does in England) and quizzed my coteacher on it.
His response? That parents dont want their kids in low grades and would get angry. So, instead of being able to teach to a level the class understands, you have classes where the best students are never tried and the worst students are totally lost.
Couple this with inability to hear ne type of criticism, pushing kids into study and extra curricular things like piano etc. do people think this desire to help their kids do the best they can is good or bad? And do you think it will ever change here?
Sigh, its things like this I find most depressing here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mindmetoo
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Korean government doesn't want elite universities to require prospective students to write English essay questions on the entrance exams. The reason? Parents are spending too much money on prep courses for the SKY triumvirate. Are there way too many deluded parents, thinking their lil hagwon rat is SNU material? I think if parents had much more reasonable expectations of what their kid is capable of in life, they'd throw away a lot less money on courses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bascially it's a cultural thing. My co-teacher said that parents here view their kids as being part of themselves thus any problems at school aren't the kids fault. She was shocked when I told her that if there was a problem at school my parents would be angry at me rather than anyone else. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaganath69

Joined: 17 Jul 2003
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 5:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I worked in a hagwon my first year and ranted and raved till I was blue in the face about the importance of ability groupings. A friend who specializes in gifted and talented teaching from back home sold me on the concept. However, I was told numerous times that the parents wanted a routine that would suit their own social and working life first and foremost and that any inkling of advanced and remedial classes would be seen as an affront by those parents whose children were in the lower classes. I even suggested that these lower graded classes could be marked on basis of effort, because after all its just a hagwon. Sadly my advice was ignored. Now at my current job things are made a bit easier as students are grouped by toefl score. While it still creates a few disparities, its by far a better system. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
crazylemongirl

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Location: almost there...
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
jaganath69 wrote: |
I worked in a hagwon my first year and ranted and raved till I was blue in the face about the importance of ability groupings. A friend who specializes in gifted and talented teaching from back home sold me on the concept. However, I was told numerous times that the parents wanted a routine that would suit their own social and working life first and foremost and that any inkling of advanced and remedial classes would be seen as an affront by those parents whose children were in the lower classes. I even suggested that these lower graded classes could be marked on basis of effort, because after all its just a hagwon. Sadly my advice was ignored. Now at my current job things are made a bit easier as students are grouped by toefl score. While it still creates a few disparities, its by far a better system. |
Yeah my situation is a regular school and they salt and pepper the poor and strong students in a random mix. Basically if you are the highest ranked student you go to one class, second highest two class etc. Yet then I always hear well what about the higher level students, they seem bored in your class. Given the share number of students I see it's impossible to identify them and provide anything for them.
Korea everyone gets the same mediocre education but wants to be treated like they are speical. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blunder1983
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
You see this is the point i get confused at.
If I play up in school I get punished, first at school then at home.
So here its the schools fault and the kid is blameless.
Now this is the bit which flummoxes me. The above arguement as I see is fundamentally flawed, I act like an idiot, I should be punished. BUT is that just my inability to see the cultural difference, or is western thinking correct on this point and they do in fact have it wrong.
Whenever I talk about this sort of thing I find I can intelligently justify my point, whereas the K arguement is simply, that is how it is. Which, IMHO, isnt an arguement at all. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joe_doufu

Joined: 09 May 2005 Location: Elsewhere
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Koreans view their children as an investment. Sort of how you'd view a mutual fund. Imagine the market gains 12 percent this year but your mutual fund only gains 11 percent. Would you be cuddly sweet and lovey dovey to your fund manager? No way. It's not the mutual fund's fault, it's just a dumb financial product, it has no feelings, and is fundamentally (no pun intended) no different from any other mutual fund. Obviously you need more and better fund managers working on it for more hours of the day. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
blunder1983
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure they are that callous Joe, if that were true then this place is far darker than I imagined.
I think they think they are helping their children out but I dont see many kids at school who'd agree with them, and all this treading water amounts to what? The children are no more intelligent than any other countries. I bite the hand that feeds but WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
waterbaby

Joined: 01 Feb 2003 Location: Baking Gord a Cheescake pie
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:27 am Post subject: Re: Do Ajummas impact negatively on kids education? |
|
|
blunder1983 wrote: |
His response? That parents dont want their kids in low grades and would get angry. |
Don't kids know their ranking within the school anyway based on their exam results? It seems bizarre that parents would get angry about their kids being in a 'low' grade when they know exactly where they're ranked anyway. Strange logic! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
guangho

Joined: 19 Jan 2005 Location: a spot full of deception, stupidity, and public micturation and thus unfit for longterm residency
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Education is the last thing on their minds. On a tangent, is it just my public school or do K teachers in public schools spend their time chatting on msn whilst sitting at their desks and the kids are waiting for whatever morsels of wisdom may be thrown their way? It's a fascinating thing to see really. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peppermint

Joined: 13 May 2003 Location: traversing the minefields of caddishness.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know, but I know we get an average of 2-3 inter buildiing memos poping up on the computer screen per class each day. That wouldn't be so bad, if the course didn't rely so heavily on showing CD-ROMs. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
panthermodern

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Taxronto
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
face it folks ....
90% of us are just aiding in the pollution of the "Korean Educational System" ...
The vast majority of Korean Hakwons are scams. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ejmlab
Joined: 17 Feb 2005 Location: Pohang
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 2:05 pm Post subject: Punishment in High Schools |
|
|
I'm not sure what it's like in general but I've been teaching at a private high school for the past year and I'd say that there's definitely a punishment system in place. I'd say 90% of the teachers heft wooden sticks or switches to discipline the students with. At first I was amazed...I even told my students during the first week of class that I'd treat them as young adults (foolish me coming from 5 years teaching Uni I should have known that they're still children) and most importantly I explained that I wouldn't strike them as it wasn't considered polite in the Western world. I'm biting my lip now. Children who are conditioned by the rod respect little else.
~~cheers
ejmlab |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
inkoreaforgood
Joined: 15 Dec 2003 Location: Inchon
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
panthermodern wrote: |
face it folks ....
90% of us are just aiding in the pollution of the "Korean Educational System" ...
The vast majority of Korean Hakwons are scams. |
Too true...
Working in the hagwons, I think EFL teachers are really trying to make a difference (in some cases). But the hagwon, in the end, is a business, for profit and nothing else. The boss has little or no actual understanding of education, and is just very good at BSing the parents into believing that the boss knows best. Most of the parents also have no idea about education, and often push the children to study excessive hours. Parents don't know what they are doing, but can't show that to anyone else, even their children. I know I'm not saying anything new here, just outlining my views.
So the big push for education here is like the big push to get on the subway. No one thinks about what they are doing, but are completely focused on their short term goal. The long term effects are ignored, and the results are not pretty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yu_Bum_suk

Joined: 25 Dec 2004
|
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
crazylemongirl wrote: |
jaganath69 wrote: |
I worked in a hagwon my first year and ranted and raved till I was blue in the face about the importance of ability groupings. A friend who specializes in gifted and talented teaching from back home sold me on the concept. However, I was told numerous times that the parents wanted a routine that would suit their own social and working life first and foremost and that any inkling of advanced and remedial classes would be seen as an affront by those parents whose children were in the lower classes. I even suggested that these lower graded classes could be marked on basis of effort, because after all its just a hagwon. Sadly my advice was ignored. Now at my current job things are made a bit easier as students are grouped by toefl score. While it still creates a few disparities, its by far a better system. |
Yeah my situation is a regular school and they salt and pepper the poor and strong students in a random mix. Basically if you are the highest ranked student you go to one class, second highest two class etc. Yet then I always hear well what about the higher level students, they seem bored in your class. Given the share number of students I see it's impossible to identify them and provide anything for them.
Korea everyone gets the same mediocre education but wants to be treated like they are speical. |
At my high school the classes seem somewhat to be grouped according to ability. The highest first grade class is a lot easier to get talking than the lowest third grade class. On the whole I guess this is better, though there are a few classes where I could use a bright light to get things going. Of course the other problem teaching 'conversational' English classes is that many of the good students are used to being passive listeners.
Re: the mentality of Korean parents, it seems like the bottom line is getting them the best test scores at school and on their university matriculation examinations. Since these now include aural comprehension examinations I think our collective value will rise a bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|