Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The Trials of Henry Kissinger
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Should Dr. Kissinger face a war crimes tribunal?
Yes
64%
 64%  [ 16 ]
No
28%
 28%  [ 7 ]
It's all rather complicated
8%
 8%  [ 2 ]
Total Votes : 25

Author Message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octavius Hite wrote:
You can argue the degree of involvment the US played but you can't deny that the US was involved and that is wrong. If Russia threw money and resources into the next American election in order to defeat the Republicans you people would be screaming for war, so I find it interesting that you are willing to back up what America did in that country.


The Vatican, the Italian Christian Democrats, the West German govt, the U.S. govt, several U.S.-based transnationals like ITT...this is a quick and incomplete list of those who backed the Chilean Christian Democrats, the National Party, and El Mercurio, a Conservative voice in Chilean affairs.

Don't assume that the Chilean Christian Democrats, the National Party, and El Mercurio didn't have plans and ideas of their own, or that the Christian Democrats weren't divided into the usual factions that have plagued Latin American politics since the Conquest era.

Moscow, Beijing, and Havana: just the top three of those who backed the Chilean Communist Party, the Chilean Socialist Party, the MIR and other of the ultras outside of the FRAP and UP coalitions, and El Siglo, a Marxist voice in Chilean affairs.

Don't asume that these leftists didn't have plans and ideas or their own, or that they, too, weren't divided into the usual factions.

Anyone who looks at these facts and then singles out the United States and says "look what they did! That is wrong!" is clearly on an antiAmerican agenda.

Why did the U.S. Senate's Church Committee and the subsequent Hinchey Report focus on the Agency?

Because we, as Americans, are concerned about our role in this so that we might make corrections in our system. There were also the politics of Watergate to consider in this equation, particularly with respect to the Church Committee. Some of us, like me, think this kind of covert action is simply unwarranted and undesirable. Whether Chile was Marxist or not, it was no threat to the U.S. or even U.S. influence in Latin America. Unfortunately, Nixon and Kissinger didn't see things that way.

Why, however, don't other states, like the Vatican, Moscow, Beijing, Havana, or Chile hold similar public hearings or declassify dox, or question their own involvement?

I don't know. Ask them. There are few govts in the world that hold such public hearings, declassify secret dox, or question and investigate themselves like the U.S. does. In any case, there is clearly a huge bias in the sources when only one of the parties declassifies dox and investigates and publishes findings on what it did wrong...


Last edited by Gopher on Fri Oct 14, 2005 6:41 am; edited 3 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octavius Hite wrote:
They knew the coup was coming and did nothing to warn Allende.


So did the Soviets, who evacuated all personnel, except for the GOSPLAN mission, in July.

Do you moralize against them too?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can't justify murder and the destruction of a nation on the idea that others were planning something. Maybe the USSR was making a move, we'll probably never know, but Allende was a democratically elected leader and the US had no right to interfer with that. Again if another country did it to you it would be war so it's very hypocritical to do it to someone else.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the difference being that the USSR wasn't giving weapons, training, and support to Chileans (that we know of). The US was involved in the murder of the head of the Army thats pretty serious and involved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octavius Hite wrote:
You can't justify murder and the destruction of a nation on the idea that others were planning something.


Never been my intent to justify anything, unlike you, who seek to sermonize, I only seek to understand.

Octavius Hite wrote:
Maybe the USSR was making a move, we'll probably never know...


Those of us who've informed ourselves on this issue before speaking, however, already know...


http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_2/doc_1140.html

http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_2/doc_1148.html

http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_2/doc_1119.html

http://www.cepchile.cl/dms/lang_2/doc_1120.html


$100 million dollar arms deals and $30 million dollar loans? A GOSPLAN mission dispatched to Santiago? Maybe the USSR was making a move?


Last edited by Gopher on Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:51 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Octavius Hite wrote:
The US was involved in the murder of the head of the Army thats pretty serious and involved.


Is that so?

Tell us how Schneider's death unfolded and who did what, then. Tell also also about the circumstances of Prats's (and Sepulveda et al.) resignation. Add Admiral Montero to that list while you're at it.

Why were they removed from the high command, then, and who removed them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See Gopher, ur a typical right winger, was the USSR a bad group of people? Sure, history judges that organization pretty harshly. However you are try to justify. U r saying that the US was right to support mass murder because of a fear of communism. So in that sense the US is no better than the Communists who did the same thing in various countries around the globe.

And here comes the big point so listen up. After 9-11 everyone in the American media and public was like "Why do they hate us so much?" This is why, the US has spent the last 50 years messing with other people's countries (democractic {Chile} and undemocractic {Iran}) for the sake of a political game and you wonder why no one likes you.

Has the US done good things? Yes. Korea, Japan, much of Europe all enjoyed what America gave them. However all that is undone when you messed in countries for your own political purposes. That is the problem. Do Ukrainians and Poles have a serious anti-russian feeling, yes becasue the USSR did the same thing there as you did in Chile, Iran, Vietnam,etc.

Just because the USSR was going to do something or did do something does not give the US the right to ruin peoples lives. That is what we call morality and you can justify all you want but in the end Kissenger is a war criminal along with a whole host of others.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gopher



Joined: 04 Jun 2005

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gopher wrote:
Octavius Hite wrote:
The US was involved in the murder of the head of the Army thats pretty serious and involved.


Is that so?

Tell us how Schneider's death unfolded and who did what, then. Tell also also about the circumstances of Prats's (and Sepulveda et al.) resignation. Add Admiral Montero to that list while you're at it.

Why were they removed from the high command, then, and who removed them?


You didn't answer this question. You brought it up. Answer it. Be specific.

You want to indict Kissinger as a war criminal? I won't defend him. But you still have to make your case. So make it, if you can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the CIA

"Retired Army General Roberto Viaux was a major coup plotter with support from non-commissioned and junior officers; he also headed several right-wing civilian groups. After CIA was directed to explore prospects for a coup to prevent Allende from taking office, a CIA officer established contact with Viaux on 9 October 1970. A second meeting with Viaux resulted in the Station forwarding a request to Washington from Viaux for weapons, tear gas and other supplies as well as a life insurance policy for himself. In reviewing Viaux��s proposal, CIA Headquarters determined that his group had no chance of carrying off a successful coup. Headquarters advised the Station, and during meetings on 17 18 October a CIA officer told a member of the Viaux group, that CIA would not entertain their request for support. The officer warned them that any coup action on their part would be premature. The Viaux representative said the coup was planned for 21-22 October, and the first step would be to kidnap General Schneider. The Station doubted the plan because CIA had no corroborative intelligence and Viaux��s group had a record of false starts.

On 22 October the Viaux group, acting independently of the CIA at that time, carried out an attempted abduction against General Schneider that resulted in his death. Schneider��s death shocked the armed forces and civilian proponents of a coup, and plans for military action were shelved."

So the CIA was not involved but only because they thought it wouldn't work, not because it was wrong. After the conspirators ended up killing the man, the CIA had to wait almost a year for the coup to go forward. And while these men did not recieve equipment for this task they were being generally supported by the CIA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the CIA:

"All three groups made it clear that any coup would require the kidnapping of Army Commander Rene Schneider, who felt deeply that the Constitution required that the Army allow Allende to assume power. CIA agreed with that assessment. Although CIA provided weapons to one of the groups, we have found no information that the plotters�� or CIA��s intention was for the general to be killed. Contact with one group of plotters was dropped early on because of its extremist tendencies. CIA provided tear gas, submachine-guns and ammunition to the second group. The third group attempted to kidnap Schneider, mortally wounding him in the attack. CIA had previously encouraged this group to launch a coup but withdrew support four days before the attack because, in CIA��s assessment, the group could not carry it out successfully"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Overview of Covert Actions. At the direction of the White House and interagency policy coordination committees, CIA undertook the covert activities described below. There were sustained propaganda efforts, including financial support for major news media, against Allende and other Marxists. Political action projects supported selected parties before and after the 1964 elections and after Allende��s 1970 election.

In April 1962, the ��5412 Panel Special Group��—a sub-cabinet body charged with reviewing proposed covert actions—approved a proposal to carry out a program of covert financial assistance to the Christian Democratic Party (PDC) to support the 1964 Presidential candidacy of Eduardo Frei.


Also in 1962, the CIA began supporting a civic action group that undertook various propaganda activities, including distributing posters and leaflets.


In December 1963, the 5412 Group agreed to provide a one-time payment to the Democratic Front, a coalition of three moderate to conservative parties, in support of the Front��s Presidential campaign.


In April 1964, the 5412 Group approved a propaganda and political action program for the upcoming September 1964 Presidential election.


In May 1964, following the dissolution of the Democratic Front, the ��303 Committee,�� successor to the 5412 Group, agreed to give the Radical Party additional covert assistance.


In February 1965, the 303 Committee approved a proposal to give covert assistance to selected candidates in upcoming Congressional elections.


In 1967, the CIA set up a propaganda mechanism for making placements in radio and news media.


In July 1968, the 303 Committee approved a political action program to support individual moderate candidates running in the 1969 Congressional elections.


As a result of 1968 propaganda activities, in 1969 the ��40 Committee�� (successor to the 303 Committee) approved the establishment of a propaganda workshop.


In the runup to the 1970 Presidential elections, the 40 Committee directed CIA to carry out ��spoiling operations�� to prevent an Allende victory.


As part of a ��Track I�� strategy to block Allende from taking office after the 4 September election, CIA sought to influence a Congressional run-off vote required by the Constitution because Allende did not win an absolute majority.


As part of a ��Track II�� strategy, CIA was directed to seek to instigate a coup to prevent Allende from taking office (see discussion below).


While Allende was in office, the 40 Committee approved the redirection of ��Track I�� operations that—combined with a renewed effort to support the PDC in 1971 and a project to provide support to the National Party and Democratic Radical Party in 1972—funneled millions of dollars to strengthen opposition political parties. CIA also provided assistance to militant right-wing groups to undermine the President and create a tense environment.


Also from the CIA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A quote from Kissenger:

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people"

The US certainly is the home of freedom, indeed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Too much too quote but here's a handy site to prove Kissenger's bloodthirsty nature:


http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB123/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

For a guy that knows it all, the historical record seems to disagree with you. Is it anti-american to tell the truth about the past, or am I just a raving pinko-commie NotAmerican?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Octavius Hite



Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Location: Househunting, looking for a new bunker from which to convert the world to homosexuality.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, its almost 5pm and its time for me to go and have some beers, have a good weekend all, even those of you with MA's in Latin American Studies. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International