| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Demonicat

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Location: Suwon
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zenpickle
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Location: Anyang -- Bisan
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm downloading my latest drivers and DirectX software. I have system requirements well beyond their recommendations, but it is still hiccuping, especially when a video pops up. And with all the typos in the tutorial and Civipedia, and a few graphical snafus like horses sticking their heads inside of pyramids, it really does look like it was rushed out the door.
Still fun, and I plan to spend many a sleepless night playing -- if it doesn't crash too regularly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Its not bad but so much shorter then civ 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
T-dot

Joined: 16 May 2004 Location: bundang
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you guys play the single or multiplayer?
just started, never played any of the CIV series. no clue what im doin. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pangit
Joined: 02 Sep 2004 Location: Puet mo.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2005 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wrench wrote: |
| Its not bad but so much shorter then civ 3 |
That means that you don't have to spend hours playing a multiplayer game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pangit wrote: |
| Wrench wrote: |
| Its not bad but so much shorter then civ 3 |
That means that you don't have to spend hours playing a multiplayer game. |
In SP I finished it under 5.5 hours. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bulsajo

Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zenpickle
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Location: Anyang -- Bisan
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, spent a good weekend playing it. I like it, but it still feels like it was rushed. There, so far, have been things that have disappointed me about it. Specifically, it didn't feel like I was progressing through separate epochs of history, like Civ 3. I liked the way that Civ 3 would show a medieval city dissolve into an industrial city. In Civ 4, you get a piece of parchment with a picture drawn on it that says you've hit the Industrial Era -- and this even this supposedly simple graphic is hammering my video card.
One thing they did in Civ 3 was make the buildings in civilizations culturally unique. Asian buildings looked like Asian buildings. South American Indian buildings had their own unique look.
I just got through playing as the Chinese, and my medieval buildings looked like Rothenberg, Germany. Yeah, the music's different, but I think that's it. All the cultures are the same except for some stats, a special unit or two, and a little soundtrack.
I like the extra worker options and the work boats, making the sea a more playable field. And I like the little things like having military units automatically skip turns until they heal. I like having specific religions at play. And I also like the cultural booster shot you can give to a frontier city by having a Great Artist make a Great Work there.
Still, there's no reason for it to hog as much resources as it does. I'm not much of a programmer, but there had to be more efficient ways to make the game. In the end, it's still a chess game. And a chess game shouldn't kick your computer's video card like a Quake-Halo Flight Sim. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wrench
Joined: 07 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I got a 6600 go and when it gets a bit intensive around 1900 the game crashes every ten years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|