View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
igotthisguitar wrote: |
igotthisguitar wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
And in the case of Robert Fisk , the truth is that he doesn't want to believe what the US says |
Joo ... you're always going on about the US this & the US that.
What EXACTLY do you mean when you use this vague little label: the US? Please explain. |
Joo ol' chap. Did you catch this? Could you clear this up? What exactly do you mean when you say "the" US? |
Quote: |
I'd like to believe that what the Americans say is true, but living here I don't believe it is".
Robert Fisk |
=
Quote: |
I'd like to believe that what the US says is true, but living here I don't believe it is". |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not what Fisk means love, but what YOU mean.
"THE" US ??? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
You tell us what Fisk meant. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
You tell us what Fisk meant. |
So why are avoiding the question? Trying to change the topic? Shift the focus? I've already asked you three times. If you don't want to provide a simple & direct answer that's your decision.
Unfortunately, in forfeiting your right to provide an autonomous response, we'll be left only to decide for ourselves why it is you once again insist on ... beating around the bush.
Happy New Year !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee

Joined: 25 May 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
igotthisguitar wrote: |
Joo Rip Gwa Rhhee wrote: |
You tell us what Fisk meant. |
So why are avoiding the question? Trying to change the topic? Shift the focus? I've already asked you three times. If you don't want to provide a simple & direct answer that's your decision.
Unfortunately, in forfeiting your right to provide an autonomous response, we'll be left only to decide for ourselves why it is you once again insist on ... beating around the bush.
Happy New Year !!! |
It was a response to what he said. Whatever he meant by it , that is what I meant by it.
Now what did he mean by it? It was your quote U answer. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
patchy

Joined: 26 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The US has a nasty habit of pitting people against one another, brother against brother for a made-up ideological reason that only the US benefits from -- this is what happened in Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq.
And then they wonder why the Iraqis won't take up arms enthusiastically and do the dirty work for the Americans.
Bush certainly miscalculated from the first. He thought he could start the war on Thursday and finish it on Sunday. Hence the name, "Shock and Awe". He thought all the lies he drummed up to justify the war would be forgiven or at the least overlooked when the Americans saw how quickly the war ended. Only it hasn't, and now Bush is squirming as people are asking questions, trying to find out why the war is still going on and why the bodybags are coming back in the thousands and not in the single digits.
And so Bush dissembles, to keep face, all the while as people are still dying: Iraqi (goodness knows how many, the racist Americans don't keep track of Iraqi casualties, they obviously don't count as human to make it worth their while doing that) and American. They are dying so that Bush can keep up the pretense that the war had to happen. But some people never bought it. They never felt in their bones that the US was under threat from Iraq. Where was the draft then? Where was the urgent patriotic call for all US men and women to come to the aid of their country and defend it - if the country was under such grave threat? No, only the poor from disenfranchised minorities, (even illegal immigrants) were sent out as only the lowliest of the low need risk their lives in this sham of a war. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shakuhachi

Joined: 08 Feb 2003 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
patchy wrote: |
The US has a nasty habit of pitting people against one another, brother against brother for a made-up ideological reason that only the US benefits from -- this is what happened in Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq.
And then they wonder why the Iraqis won't take up arms enthusiastically and do the dirty work for the Americans.
Bush certainly miscalculated from the first. He thought he could start the war on Thursday and finish it on Sunday. Hence the name, "Shock and Awe". He thought all the lies he drummed up to justify the war would be forgiven or at the least overlooked when the Americans saw how quickly the war ended. Only it hasn't, and now Bush is squirming as people are asking questions, trying to find out why the war is still going on and why the bodybags are coming back in the thousands and not in the single digits.
And so Bush dissembles, to keep face, all the while as people are still dying: Iraqi (goodness knows how many, the racist Americans don't keep track of Iraqi casualties, they obviously don't count as human to make it worth their while doing that) and American. They are dying so that Bush can keep up the pretense that the war had to happen. But some people never bought it. They never felt in their bones that the US was under threat from Iraq. Where was the draft then? Where was the urgent patriotic call for all US men and women to come to the aid of their country and defend it - if the country was under such grave threat? No, only the poor from disenfranchised minorities, (even illegal immigrants) were sent out as only the lowliest of the low need risk their lives in this sham of a war. |
Amazing. I just found out that I can be against the intervention in Iraq and also be disgusted at your anti Americanism at the same time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
afraid it isn't the first time that's happened to me on this board shakuhachi. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rapier
Joined: 16 Feb 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Its too obvious Iraq would vote along ethnic lines, with minorities feeling left out.
What was needed for long term peace was to subdivide the country into separate states that could go their own separate ways.
Totally obvious..but apparently impossible. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bucheon bum
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for once i agree with you rapier. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigBlackEquus
Joined: 05 Jul 2005 Location: Lotte controls Asia with bad chocolate!
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They would just war on each other for the whole pie.
Everyone would claim control over this and that religious shrine, etc. It would not work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
On the other hand
Joined: 19 Apr 2003 Location: I walk along the avenue
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
The US has a nasty habit of pitting people against one another, brother against brother for a made-up ideological reason that only the US benefits from -- this is what happened in Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq.
|
You must think that Korean, Vietnamese, and Iraqi people are pretty stupid if they go to war for no other reason besides Uncle Sam walking in and saying "okay, now everybody go to war". |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
patchy

Joined: 26 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the other hand wrote: |
Quote: |
The US has a nasty habit of pitting people against one another, brother against brother for a made-up ideological reason that only the US benefits from -- this is what happened in Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq.
|
You must think that Korean, Vietnamese, and Iraqi people are pretty stupid if they go to war for no other reason besides Uncle Sam walking in and saying "okay, now everybody go to war". |
Well, it's not a case of 'Uncle Sam [just] walking in and saying "okay, now everybody go to war"', is it? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
patchy

Joined: 26 Apr 2005
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 5:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
shakuhachi wrote: |
patchy wrote: |
The US has a nasty habit of pitting people against one another, brother against brother for a made-up ideological reason that only the US benefits from -- this is what happened in Korea, Vietnam and now Iraq.
And then they wonder why the Iraqis won't take up arms enthusiastically and do the dirty work for the Americans.
Bush certainly miscalculated from the first. He thought he could start the war on Thursday and finish it on Sunday. Hence the name, "Shock and Awe". He thought all the lies he drummed up to justify the war would be forgiven or at the least overlooked when the Americans saw how quickly the war ended. Only it hasn't, and now Bush is squirming as people are asking questions, trying to find out why the war is still going on and why the bodybags are coming back in the thousands and not in the single digits.
And so Bush dissembles, to keep face, all the while as people are still dying: Iraqi (goodness knows how many, the racist Americans don't keep track of Iraqi casualties, they obviously don't count as human to make it worth their while doing that) and American. They are dying so that Bush can keep up the pretense that the war had to happen. But some people never bought it. They never felt in their bones that the US was under threat from Iraq. Where was the draft then? Where was the urgent patriotic call for all US men and women to come to the aid of their country and defend it - if the country was under such grave threat? No, only the poor from disenfranchised minorities, (even illegal immigrants) were sent out as only the lowliest of the low need risk their lives in this sham of a war. |
Amazing. I just found out that I can be against the intervention in Iraq and also be disgusted at your anti Americanism at the same time. |
So which part(s) of my post do you disagree with? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|