| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Did the cartoons go too far? |
| Yes, like Clinton said, they were appalling! |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
| Yes, but the cartoons weren't that bad |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| No, the Muslims overreacted! |
|
63% |
[ 23 ] |
| No, the Cartoons didn't go far enough in depicting Mohammad |
|
13% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 36 |
|
| Author |
Message |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| great!the cartoons were published in an isreali paper today.as if hamas need more reasons. |
Do you have a link? Another French paper published the story. They also added another cartoon...
I can't believe this hasn't died down yet....what's next? A terrorist act in France?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mills
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Gord wrote: |
| Mills wrote: |
@ everyone,
You have to understand that any depiction of Muhammad (good or bad) is considered blasphemy in Islam. |
Only it's not. Worshipping of idols is what's not allowed, not images of the man. In recent years, clerics have increasingly been saying that "do not worship idols" means no pictures, but that's a pretty big jump which I would not agree with. |
Idolitry is forbade by the Koran... clerics do not promote pictures of Muhammad to eliminate the chance of any idol worship arising (praying to a picture of Muhammad is idol worship). In Islam, the clerics are God's representatives on earth; what they say goes. If they say pictures = idols, then pictures = idols.
Everyone should take off their cultural blinders when approaching this issue.
To date only protesters have been casualties (to the best of my knowledge). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SPINOZA
Joined: 10 Jun 2005 Location: $eoul
|
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More from the Muslim nutters!
Right Wing Muslims (is there any other kind?) are certainly doing a great job THEMSELVES of showing the world what total nutcases they so obviously are. Digging their own graves. If there are any attacks on people because of this, people in the West are going to be seriously pissed off with Muslims and subsequent wars against Muslim nations may not be greeted with as much condemnation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fiveeagles

Joined: 19 May 2005 Location: Vancouver
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
igotthisguitar

Joined: 08 Apr 2003 Location: South Korea (Permanent Vacation)
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Several postmodern satirists have highlighted the point that -- since no one really knows what Mohammed looked like -- any image could be said to depict him. To that end, they have captioned photos of their thumbs or rudimentary stick figures as "Mohammed." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coolsage
Joined: 28 Jan 2003 Location: The overcast afternoon of the soul
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| They were CARTOONS! In this post 9-11 era, satire is perhaps more important than it ever was. I keep hearing that the vast majority of Muslims are peace-loving people. If that's the case, then LIGHTEN UP. God knows that Jesus has been satirized a time or two. The leading edge of Islam extremism (Al Kaeda, Taliban) would have the faithful go forward into the golden age of the seventh century. Frankly speaking, any organized religion is potentially repressive (with the possible exception of Buddhism), but Islam, without moderates speaking out, is damned dangerous. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mj roach
Joined: 16 Mar 2003
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Seems the most violent protests are in "countries" with the most repressive regimes.
Might have more to do with people feeling oppressed and without hope of making a better life while their rulers:
... go on mega $$ junkets to Harrads, sojourn on the Riviera with retinues of 100, fatten their Swiss # accounts, and pass the future to their progeny.
Haven't seen foreign legations burning in (Muslim) countries where people have a stake in the process and a chance to improve their lot.
The causes of the riots are more similar to those in Watts or Paris rather
than any religious basis. Squeeze people long enough and hard enough....
someting will errupt.
The only possible good to come of the situation would be for the rioters to feel empowered enough to turn their anger on their oppressors. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rteacher

Joined: 23 May 2005 Location: Western MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey a billion people, many quite volatile and dirt poor, don't want to see or hear about their prophet or whatever they hold sacred being satirized so I think it would be stupid to go on provoking them with more of the same. Both sides lose. If the media can't regulate itself to avoid what it now knows is considered by many to be blasphemous in this instance there should be creation of and enforcement of blasphemy laws ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mills
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mj roach wrote: |
Seems the most violent protests are in "countries" with the most repressive regimes.
|
The violence has been against protesters, at the hands of repressive regimes.
Google "casualties"+"cartoons"
I'm not an Islamic sympathiser, I'm just saying.
*Edit - I hate when I catch an error after I've already posted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigverne

Joined: 12 May 2004
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 7:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| If the media can't regulate itself to avoid what it now knows is considered by many to be blasphemous in this instance there should be creation of and enforcement of blasphemy laws ... |
In Muslim states, where 'defaming' the prophet is a crime, they already have such laws. There is no reason why we should enact such laws in the West, simply because Muslims often resort to violence. All ideologies, and '-isms' should be open to criticism, mockery and ridicule. We should not base our laws on the propensity of certain groups to commit acts of violence. That is no way to govern a society. I would never go to a Muslim country, and speak ill of Mohammed or Islam, for it is not the done thing in their culture. They must understand that Westerners do not take such a deferential attitude towards established religion, and they should certainly not try to force their cultural norms on us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mills
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 Location: Incheon
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
This was in "Stars and Stripes" today;
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RACETRAITOR
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Location: Seoul, South Korea
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This was just published in a Saskatchewan university newspaper, causing heads to roll (figuratively only).
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
seoulsucker

Joined: 05 Mar 2006 Location: The Land of the Hesitant Cutoff
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RACETRAITOR wrote: |
This was just published in a Saskatchewan university newspaper, causing heads to roll (figuratively only).
 |
If I didn't have a job, money, friends, an education, a relatively free life, access to information and outside thoughts and opinoins, clean drinking water, health care, reliable transportation, and existence in a tolerant society where I can stare at shorts skirts and F***-me boots all day long, that might have offended me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|