Site Search:
 
Speak Korean Now!
Teach English Abroad and Get Paid to see the World!
Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index Korean Job Discussion Forums
"The Internet's Meeting Place for ESL/EFL Teachers from Around the World!"
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SD Bans Abortion

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:34 pm    Post subject: SD Bans Abortion Reply with quote

SD House Approves Abortion Ban Bill

Hmmm.. Looks like the abortion debate is going to get even uglier now.

Quote:
Republican Gov. Mike Rounds said he was inclined to sign the bill, which would make it a crime for doctors to perform an abortion unless it was necessary to save the woman's life. The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest.


Another reason not to live in South Dakota...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bulsajo



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a state by state issue in the US?
Can the feds veto and/or Supreme court overturn it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucheon bum



Joined: 16 Jan 2003

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well part of the reason the lawmakers of south dakota did it is they knew they'd get sued by Planned Parenthood and the like, saying the law is unconstitutional. This bad boy is going to be in the courts for years. The lawmakers are hoping it gets bumped up to the Supreme court eventually, where it'll be allowed to pass, and therefore eliminating Roe v. Wade. It is no coincidence whatsoever that the bill was passed soon after Alioto's confirmation. According to the article, some pro-life person has donated 1 million bucks for South Dakota to fight the lawsuit. A fund to pay for the legal fees is being arranged as well.

Fun times.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ya-ta Boy



Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Location: Established in 1994

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 4:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Each state writes its own laws regulating the details of abortion. Through its decisions, the Supreme Court sets the guidelines. The Court can void a state (or federal) law that oversteps those guidelines.

Laws regulating capital punishment are handled the same. Some states, like Texas, have it; some states, like Iowa, do not. Those states with it must comply with Court guidelines.

I'm not a lawyer and certainly no expert on abortion law, so I don't know if abortion can be legal in one state and illegal in another state, like capital punishment is now. In my opinion, that would be the best solution to the issue. But as I say, I don't know if it is constitutionally possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
canuckistan
Mod Team
Mod Team


Joined: 17 Jun 2003
Location: Training future GS competitors.....

PostPosted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest.


I suppose it is one way of shoring up a declining birth rate
(there is no emoticon for digust)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jinglejangle



Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Location: Far far far away.

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

canuckistan wrote:
Quote:
The measure would make no exception in cases of rape or incest.


I suppose it is one way of shoring up a declining birth rate
(there is no emoticon for digust)


I kind of doubt that rape and incest will make much of a difference to the birth rate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
fiveeagles



Joined: 19 May 2005
Location: Vancouver

PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 4:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bucheon bum wrote:
Well part of the reason the lawmakers of south dakota did it is they knew they'd get sued by Planned Parenthood and the like, saying the law is unconstitutional. This bad boy is going to be in the courts for years. The lawmakers are hoping it gets bumped up to the Supreme court eventually, where it'll be allowed to pass, and therefore eliminating Roe v. Wade. It is no coincidence whatsoever that the bill was passed soon after Alioto's confirmation. According to the article, some pro-life person has donated 1 million bucks for South Dakota to fight the lawsuit. A fund to pay for the legal fees is being arranged as well.

Fun times.


Hmmm, sounds familiar. Funny you didn't see my thread on this. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korean Job Discussion Forums Forum Index -> Current Events Forum All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page is maintained by the one and only Dave Sperling.
Contact Dave's ESL Cafe
Copyright © 2018 Dave Sperling. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

TEFL International Supports Dave's ESL Cafe
TEFL Courses, TESOL Course, English Teaching Jobs - TEFL International